What are the ethical errors in an online research study on gastritis patients using 2 different Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 15, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ethical Errors in Online Research Studies

The primary ethical error in this online research study is that informed consent cannot be adequately monitored or verified in the online interview format (Option C). 1

Key Ethical Concerns in Online Health Research

Informed Consent Monitoring is the Critical Issue

The most significant ethical problem with conducting research through online interviews is the inability to properly monitor and verify the informed consent process. 1 This represents a fundamental breach of research ethics principles because:

  • Only 1 out of 119 online health studies actually sought informed consent from participants, demonstrating widespread failure in this area 1
  • The online format makes it impossible to verify participant identity, comprehension of risks, or voluntary participation 1
  • Researchers cannot ensure participants truly understand the study implications, particularly regarding NSAID use in gastritis patients where there are significant health risks 2, 3, 4

Why Other Options Are Less Critical

Privacy concerns (Option A) exist but are secondary to consent issues. While 27.7% of online health studies contained identifying information, privacy can be technically protected through anonymization 1

Information accuracy (Option B) is a methodological concern rather than an ethical violation. While online data collection may have accuracy limitations, this doesn't constitute an ethical breach per se 1

Participant withdrawal (Option D) is typically manageable in online formats through opt-out mechanisms, as demonstrated in studies where participants could exit via email or comments 1

The Broader Context

The Journal of Medical Internet Research systematic review found that 73.9% of online health studies made no mention of ethical considerations, and only 12.6% sought IRB review 1 This widespread neglect of ethical oversight in online research underscores why informed consent monitoring is the most serious concern.

Common pitfall: Researchers often assume online platforms constitute "public space" and therefore don't require traditional consent processes, but this is ethically problematic when dealing with vulnerable populations like gastritis patients being exposed to NSAIDs 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.