Does immunity from one dose of the Measles, Mumps, and Rubella (MMR) vaccine wane after a few years?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 16, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

MMR Immunity After One Dose Does Not Wane Significantly

No, immunity from one dose of MMR vaccine does not disappear after a few years—waning immunity is not a major cause of vaccine failure. 1 The primary reason for recommending two doses is to capture the approximately 5% of people who fail to respond to the first dose (primary vaccine failure), not because immunity fades over time. 1

Why Two Doses Are Recommended

The evidence is clear on this critical distinction:

  • Waning immunity has little influence on measles transmission, and the major benefit of the second dose is reducing the proportion of persons who remain susceptible due to primary vaccine failure. 1
  • Approximately 5% of children who receive only one dose fail to develop immunity initially—they never mounted an adequate response in the first place. 1
  • Almost all persons who don't respond to the first dose will respond to the second dose, which is why the two-dose schedule is so effective. 1, 2

Long-Term Immunity Data by Component

Measles

  • Greater than 95% of susceptible persons develop serologic evidence of immunity after one dose. 1
  • Antibodies against measles decline moderately after vaccination but remain well above the seropositivity threshold after 10 years. 3
  • At 10 years post-vaccination, 93.7% of two-dose recipients maintained protective antibody levels. 4

Rubella

  • Greater than 90% of vaccinated persons have protection against both clinical rubella and viremia for at least 15 years. 1
  • Follow-up studies indicate that one dose confers long-term—probably lifelong—protection. 1
  • At 10 years post-vaccination, 83.9%-100% maintained protective rubella antibody levels. 4

Mumps

  • More than 97% develop measurable antibody following vaccination, with approximately 95% efficacy in controlled trials. 1
  • Serologic and epidemiologic data collected during 30 years of vaccine use indicate both persistence of antibody and continuing protection. 1
  • Mumps shows the most waning: only 69-73% had protective levels at 9-11 years, but a second dose has a genuine boosting effect on mumps antibodies. 3, 4

Critical Clinical Pitfall

Do not confuse low or negative antibody titers with lack of immunity. 2 If someone has two documented doses of MMR vaccine, they are considered immune regardless of serologic testing results, and do not need a third dose. 2 Antibody titers can wane over time without loss of immune memory—the immune system retains the ability to mount a rapid response upon exposure even when circulating antibodies are low. 2

The Bottom Line

  • The second dose is not a booster because waning immunity is not the problem—it's a "catch-up" dose for primary vaccine failures. 1
  • Revaccination of children who have low levels of measles antibody produces only a transient rise in antibody levels, further confirming that waning is not the issue. 1
  • A second dose of MMR vaccine given later in life had only a minor and transient effect on anti-measles and anti-rubella waning titers. 3

The exception is mumps, where a second dose does provide some genuine boosting effect, but even here, the primary rationale for two doses remains capturing initial non-responders rather than addressing waning immunity. 3, 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.