What is the significance of Mallampati scores in assessing airway difficulty for endotracheal intubation?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Mallampati Score: A Critical Airway Assessment Tool

What is the Mallampati Score?

The Mallampati score is a four-level classification system that assesses the visibility of oropharyngeal structures and serves as the single most important predictor of difficult intubation, receiving the highest weighting (5 points) in validated prediction scores. 1

The classification system works as follows:

  • Class I: Soft palate, fauces, uvula, and both anterior and posterior pillars are visible 1
  • Class II: Soft palate, fauces, and uvula are visible 1
  • Class III: Only soft palate and base of the uvula are visible 1
  • Class IV: Soft palate is not visible 1

Clinical Significance for Predicting Difficult Intubation

A Mallampati score of III or IV substantially increases the risk of difficult intubation and is associated with difficult intubation in both general and obstetric populations. 1, 2 This finding is consistent across multiple clinical settings, though the predictive performance has important limitations that must be understood.

Diagnostic Performance

The Mallampati score demonstrates moderate sensitivity (56%) and specificity (69%) for predicting difficult intubation when using the standard modified Mallampati classification. 3 However, research shows that:

  • Mallampati classification has the highest specificity for predicting easy intubation, making it useful for ruling out difficult airways 4
  • The test generates numerous false-positive warnings for each correct prediction of a difficult airway 5
  • Sensitivity is inadequate for reliably identifying all difficult airways, with likelihood ratios indicating only a small clinical effect on outcome prediction 5

Integration into Prediction Scores

The Mallampati score is most valuable when incorporated into the MACOCHA score, a validated prediction tool where Mallampati III or IV receives 5 points (the highest weighting of any component). 1 The complete MACOCHA score includes:

  • M: Mallampati III or IV (5 points) 1
  • A: Obstructive sleep apnea (2 points) 1
  • C: Limited cervical spine mobility (1 point) 1
  • O: Mouth opening <3 cm (1 point) 1
  • C: Coma (1 point) 1
  • H: Hypoxemia (1 point) 1
  • A: Untrained or non-anesthesiologist operator (1 point) 1

A MACOCHA score ≥3 has high negative predictive value (97-98%) and sensitivity (73-76%) for ruling out difficult intubation. 1

Important Caveats and Limitations

Reliability Issues

The Mallampati score suffers from significant interobserver variability, with independent observers commonly grading it differently. 5 This inconsistency in examination technique contributes to heterogeneity in diagnostic performance. 3

Examination Technique Matters

Using the "best visible Mallampati score" (with cervical extension, tongue in, and phonation) decreases sensitivity by 30% compared to the standard modified Mallampati classification and falsely reclassifies 53% of patients with difficult intubation as low risk. 3 Therefore, a careful standard examination of the modified Mallampati classification is required during preoperative airway assessment. 3

Feasibility Limitations

The Mallampati score cannot be evaluated in many young children and in patients who cannot cooperate due to their underlying medical condition. 5 This limits its applicability in emergency settings and certain patient populations.

Clinical Application in Different Settings

Obstetric Population

In obstetric patients, the factors associated with difficult intubation are the same as non-pregnant patients, including high Mallampati score, short neck, receding mandible, protruding maxillary incisors, and increased neck circumference. 6 The Mallampati score was the most frequently used single test for difficult laryngoscopy in the obstetric literature. 6

ICU Setting

The incidence of difficult intubation in the ICU ranges from 8-23%, which is higher than in the operating room, making airway assessment particularly important in this setting. 1 Intubation procedures should be standardized with an algorithm that includes assessment of risk factors for difficult intubation. 1

Emergency Department

In the ED setting, the Mallampati score lacks the accuracy, reliability, and feasibility required to supplement a standard airway evaluation before airway management or procedural sedation. 5 There is no specific evidence that it augments or improves baseline clinical judgment of a standard airway evaluation in emergency situations. 5

Practical Recommendations

For patients with Mallampati III or IV (or MACOCHA score ≥3), ensure a difficult airway trolley and bronchoscope are immediately available. 1 Consider awake intubation when oxygenation and manual ventilation may not be guaranteed after induction of anesthesia. 2

Use videolaryngoscopy as the primary device for patients at risk of difficult intubation, as it is superior to direct laryngoscopy. 1, 2

The Mallampati score can also predict difficulty with proper placement of a laryngeal mask airway (LMA), providing additional utility beyond intubation prediction. 1

References

Guideline

Difficult Airway Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Difficult Laryngoscopy and Intubation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The best method to predict easy intubation: a quasi-experimental pilot study.

Journal of perianesthesia nursing : official journal of the American Society of PeriAnesthesia Nurses, 2014

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.