What is the best interpretation of a cohort study finding that 30 out of 1000 people develop breast cancer per year in the general population?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 18, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Interpretation of Cohort Study Results: Incidence Rate

The correct interpretation is that 30 people develop breast cancer per 1000 person-years, which represents an incidence rate, not a prevalence or percentage of the population.

Understanding Incidence Rate vs. Prevalence

The finding of "30 per 1000 person-years" is an incidence rate, which measures the rate at which new cases occur over time in a population at risk. This is fundamentally different from prevalence (the proportion of people who have the disease at a given time).

Key Distinctions:

  • Incidence rate (what the study measured): 30 new cases per 1000 person-years means that if you follow 1000 people for one year, you would expect approximately 30 new breast cancer diagnoses 1, 2

  • NOT a percentage: This is not stating that 30% of people have breast cancer—that would be epidemiologically impossible and would represent a prevalence far exceeding any known population burden 1

  • NOT a cumulative risk: This is different from lifetime risk, which for breast cancer is approximately 12% (or 1 in 8 women) over an entire lifetime 1

Context from Established Incidence Data

To understand why option C is correct, consider established breast cancer incidence rates:

  • European Union: The crude incidence is approximately 94-110 per 100,000 women per year 1

  • United States: The incidence rate was approximately 124 per 100,000 women in 2003 1

  • Converting to comparable units: 30 per 1000 person-years = 3,000 per 100,000 person-years, which would be extraordinarily high but represents an incidence rate, not prevalence 1, 2

Common Pitfalls to Avoid:

  • Confusing incidence with prevalence: Incidence measures new cases over time; prevalence measures existing cases at a point in time 3

  • Misinterpreting person-years: Person-years accounts for varying follow-up times and represents the total time all participants were observed 2

  • Converting to percentages incorrectly: An incidence rate cannot be directly converted to a percentage of the population without considering the time dimension 1

The study result should be reported as an incidence rate of 30 per 1000 person-years, which quantifies the risk of developing breast cancer over time in the observed population 1, 3, 2.

References

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.