Diagnostic Approach for Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome (PRES)
MRI brain without IV contrast is the gold standard for diagnosing PRES, demonstrating characteristic bilateral vasogenic edema predominantly in the parieto-occipital regions on T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences, with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps confirming vasogenic rather than cytotoxic edema. 1, 2
Clinical Recognition
PRES should be suspected in patients presenting with acute neurological symptoms including:
- Altered mental status or encephalopathy 3, 4
- Seizures or status epilepticus 3, 4
- Visual disturbances (including cortical blindness) 3, 5
- Severe headache 3, 4
Key clinical contexts that should trigger diagnostic consideration:
- Acute hypertensive crisis with blood pressure exceeding autoregulatory limits 6, 7
- Recent initiation or dose escalation of immunosuppressive agents (particularly cyclosporine) 3, 7
- Eclampsia or preeclampsia 4, 8
- Renal failure or acute kidney injury 8, 5
- Active chemotherapy or cytotoxic drug administration 3, 7
- Autoimmune disease flares 8
Essential Imaging Protocol
MRI brain without IV contrast is mandatory and should include: 1, 2
- T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences to identify hyperintense vasogenic edema in cortical and subcortical regions 1, 2
- Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with calculated ADC maps to confirm vasogenic edema (increased ADC values) and exclude cytotoxic edema from ischemic stroke 1, 2
- T2 GRE or susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI)* to detect microhemorrhages, which are compatible with PRES diagnosis 1, 8
Characteristic MRI Findings
- Bilateral parieto-occipital regions (most common, predominantly white matter) 2, 4
- Frontal and temporal lobes (frequently involved) 2, 4
- Cerebellum, brainstem, deep white matter, and thalamus (less common but possible) 2
Signal characteristics: 2
- Hyperintensity on T2-weighted and FLAIR images 2
- Isointensity or mild hyperintensity on DWI with increased ADC values (vasogenic edema) 2
- Hemorrhagic transformation may be present and does not exclude diagnosis 8
CT Limitations and Role
CT head without contrast has significant diagnostic limitations: 1
- Low tissue contrast resolution prevents detection of subtle white matter edema 1
- May appear completely normal in early PRES 1
CT should only be used when: 1, 3
- MRI is not immediately available and intracranial hemorrhage must be excluded urgently 1, 3
- Patient has contraindications to MRI 3
Critical Laboratory Workup
Essential blood tests to identify underlying causes and exclude mimics: 1
- Electrolytes (sodium, calcium, magnesium) 1
- Glucose 1
- Complete blood count 1
- Inflammatory markers (CRP, ESR) 1
- Renal function (BUN, creatinine) 1
- Blood pressure monitoring (continuous if possible) 1
Medication history review: 1
- Immunosuppressants (cyclosporine, tacrolimus) 1
- Chemotherapy agents 1
- Recent drug changes or dose escalations 1
Differential Diagnosis to Exclude
The following conditions must be systematically ruled out as they require different management: 1
Vascular Mimics
- Acute ischemic stroke in posterior circulation - distinguished by restricted diffusion (low ADC values) on DWI, unlike PRES which shows increased ADC 1, 2
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage - excluded by CT or FLAIR imaging showing sulcal hyperintensity 1
- Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis - requires MR venography 1
Inflammatory/Infectious Mimics
- Viral encephalitis - requires CSF analysis when infectious etiology suspected 1
- Autoimmune encephalitis - shows different enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced sequences 1
- CNS vasculitis - demonstrates vessel wall abnormalities on contrast imaging 1
Metabolic Mimics
- Wernicke encephalopathy - different distribution pattern (mammillary bodies, thalamus) 1
- Osmotic demyelination syndrome - central pontine involvement 1
Diagnostic Confirmation Strategy
Follow-up imaging is essential to confirm diagnosis: 2, 7
- Repeat MRI in 7-14 days after treatment initiation to document resolution of vasogenic edema 2, 7
- Clinical and radiological reversibility confirms PRES diagnosis retrospectively 7, 8
- Persistent abnormalities or progression suggest alternative diagnosis (particularly if ADC values decrease, indicating cytotoxic edema and irreversible infarction) 2
Common Diagnostic Pitfalls
Avoid these errors that delay diagnosis:
- Relying on CT alone when MRI is available - CT misses early or subtle PRES in most cases 1
- Failing to obtain DWI/ADC sequences - these are critical to distinguish vasogenic from cytotoxic edema 2
- Dismissing diagnosis when hemorrhage is present - microhemorrhages are compatible with PRES 8
- Assuming normal imaging excludes PRES - rare mild cases may show minimal or no radiographic changes 8
- Delaying imaging in perioperative patients with delayed emergence from anesthesia - PRES should be in the differential 5
Neurology consultation is recommended for comprehensive assessment, particularly when diagnosis is uncertain or atypical features are present 3