What are the recent classifications for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in critically ill patients, including definitions of Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN), Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss, End-stage (RIFLE), and Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria, and how do they differ?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recent Classification Systems for Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients

Current Standard: KDIGO Criteria

The KDIGO criteria are the current gold standard for AKI diagnosis and staging in critically ill patients, having harmonized and superseded both RIFLE and AKIN classifications. 1 The 2020 KDIGO nomenclature guidelines explicitly state that previous classifications including RIFLE and AKIN should be avoided. 1

KDIGO Definition of AKI

AKI is diagnosed when any one of the following criteria is met: 1, 2

  • Serum creatinine increase ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours, OR
  • Serum creatinine increase to ≥1.5 times baseline within 7 days, OR
  • Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 consecutive hours

KDIGO Staging System

Stage 1: 1, 3, 2

  • SCr 1.5-1.9 times baseline OR increase ≥0.3 mg/dL
  • Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6-12 hours

Stage 2: 1, 3, 2

  • SCr 2.0-2.9 times baseline
  • Urine output <0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥12 hours

Stage 3: 1, 3, 2

  • SCr ≥3.0 times baseline OR increase to ≥4.0 mg/dL (with acute rise of ≥0.3 mg/dL) OR initiation of renal replacement therapy
  • Urine output <0.3 mL/kg/h for ≥24 hours OR anuria for ≥12 hours
  • In patients <18 years: eGFR decrease to <35 mL/min/1.73 m²

The staging is determined retrospectively by the most severe criterion met, and progression through stages correlates strongly with increased mortality. 3, 2


Historical Classification Systems

RIFLE Criteria (Superseded)

The RIFLE system was the first consensus definition proposed by the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative: 1, 3

  • Risk: SCr increase to 1.5× baseline; UO <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6h
  • Injury: SCr increase to 2× baseline; UO <0.5 mL/kg/h for 12h
  • Failure: SCr increase to 3× baseline OR SCr ≥4 mg/dL with acute increase of 0.5 mg/dL; UO <0.3 mL/kg/h for 24h or anuria for 12h
  • Loss: Need for RRT for >4 weeks
  • End-stage: Need for RRT for >3 months

The RIFLE criteria required changes to be abrupt (within 1-7 days) and sustained (≥24 hours). 1

AKIN Criteria (Superseded)

The AKIN classification (2007) modified RIFLE by: 1, 3

  • Adding the 0.3 mg/dL increase within 48 hours to define Stage 1 AKI
  • Shortening the timeframe from 7 days to 48 hours for creatinine changes
  • Removing GFR criteria as markers of AKI
  • Eliminating the outcome categories (Loss and End-stage)
  • Stipulating that adequate fluid resuscitation and exclusion of urinary obstruction should precede diagnosis 1

AKIN used three stages (1,2,3) corresponding roughly to RIFLE's Risk, Injury, and Failure categories. 1


Key Differences Between AKIN and KDIGO

KDIGO merged and refined both RIFLE and AKIN systems: 1, 3

  1. Timeframe for creatinine changes:

    • KDIGO maintained AKIN's 0.3 mg/dL increase within 48 hours for Stage 1
    • KDIGO also retained RIFLE's ≥50% increase within 7 days criterion 1, 3
  2. Stage 3 criteria modification:

    • KDIGO changed the threshold to SCr ≥4.0 mg/dL (from AKIN's requirement of acute increase of 0.5 mg/dL)
    • KDIGO requires only 0.3 mg/dL acute increase when SCr reaches ≥4.0 mg/dL 1
    • This represents a more sensitive criterion but may capture normal daily variation in CKD patients 1
  3. Pediatric considerations:

    • KDIGO added specific criteria for patients <18 years: eGFR decrease to <35 mL/min/1.73 m² defines Stage 3 1
  4. Classification approach:

    • KDIGO recommends classifying by both cause and stage (e.g., "AKI stage 3 due to ATN") rather than stage alone 1
  5. Validation and adoption:

    • KDIGO has been independently validated in multiple large studies showing superior predictive ability for mortality compared to RIFLE 4
    • The concordance between KDIGO and newer biomarker-based criteria is higher (95.9%) than with RIFLE or AKIN 5

Clinical Significance and Validation

Even the 0.3 mg/dL creatinine increase is independently associated with approximately 4-fold increase in hospital mortality, validating the inclusion of this sensitive criterion. 3, 2 Large epidemiologic studies confirm that AKI occurs in approximately 50% of critically ill ICU patients using KDIGO criteria, with stepwise mortality increases across stages. 6, 4

Important caveat: The KDOQI US Commentary raised concerns about potential overdiagnosis and unnecessary consultations when applying KDIGO criteria rigidly to guide clinical management, particularly the Stage 3 criterion in CKD patients. 1, 3


Early and Novel Biomarkers of AKI

Established Early Biomarkers

Neutrophil Gelatinase-Associated Lipocalin (NGAL): 1

  • Detects tubular injury before creatinine rises
  • Can identify kidney damage in the absence of functional decline

Kidney Injury Molecule-1 (KIM-1): 1

  • Marker of proximal tubular injury
  • Useful for early AKI detection

Newest Biomarkers

Cell Cycle Arrest Biomarkers: 7

  • Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2)
  • Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 7 (IGFBP7)
  • These markers indicate cellular stress and early tubular damage 7

Cystatin C: 5

  • Less affected by muscle mass, age, and sex compared to creatinine
  • Cystatin C-based criteria show higher predictive ability (AUC 0.70) for 28-day mortality compared to KDIGO, AKIN, or RIFLE 5
  • Concordance with KDIGO is 95.9%, higher than with RIFLE or AKIN 5

Proposed Integrated Approach

KDIGO Stage 1 substaging based on biomarkers: 7

  • Stage 1S: Early kidney injury detected by biomarkers but not yet meeting creatinine/UO criteria
  • Stage 1A: Meets creatinine/UO criteria without biomarker elevation
  • Stage 1B: Meets both functional criteria and has elevated damage biomarkers

This approach combines damage biomarkers with functional criteria to improve diagnostic accuracy and risk stratification. 7


Special Considerations for Critically Ill Patients

Limitations of Urine Output Criteria

In cirrhotic patients with ascites: 7, 2

  • Focus exclusively on serum creatinine changes
  • Urine output criteria are unreliable due to avid sodium retention despite relatively normal GFR
  • Diuretic therapy further confounds interpretation
  • A creatinine threshold of ≥1.5 mg/dL predicts AKI progression and worse prognosis in this population 7

Limitations of Creatinine Criteria

Serum creatinine significantly overestimates kidney function in: 7

  • Patients with muscle wasting
  • Volume expansion states
  • Hyperbilirubinemia (interferes with colorimetric assays)
  • Increased tubular secretion of creatinine

Acute Kidney Disease (AKD) Concept

AKD bridges the gap between AKI and CKD: 1, 2

  • Defined as kidney dysfunction lasting 7-90 days after AKI onset
  • Includes patients with GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² for ≤3 months, or GFR decrease ≥35%, or SCr increase >50% for ≤3 months 1
  • AKD persisting >90 days transitions to CKD 2
  • Patients should be evaluated 3 months after AKI for resolution or progression to CKD 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Acute Kidney Injury Definition and Staging

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Acute Kidney Injury Diagnosis and Staging

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnóstico y Estadificación de Lesión Renal Aguda

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.