What imaging techniques are used to diagnose hyperparathyroidism?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 20, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Imaging for Hyperparathyroidism Diagnosis

Primary Recommendation

For primary hyperparathyroidism requiring surgery, begin with either ultrasound combined with 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy (preferably with SPECT/CT), or proceed directly to 18F-choline PET/CT for preoperative localization. 1

Critical Distinction: Imaging Does Not Diagnose Hyperparathyroidism

  • Imaging has no role in confirming or excluding the diagnosis of hyperparathyroidism—diagnosis is established biochemically through elevated serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels 1, 2
  • The sole purpose of imaging is to localize abnormal parathyroid glands preoperatively to facilitate minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) 1

First-Line Imaging Modalities

Ultrasound Combined with Sestamibi Scintigraphy

  • Combined ultrasound and scintigraphy demonstrates the highest sensitivity for localizing parathyroid adenomas, particularly in patients with concurrent thyroid disease 3
  • Ultrasound provides a safe, radiation-free modality but is operator-dependent 4
  • Sestamibi scan sensitivity is improved when performed with SPECT or SPECT/CT imaging 3, 4
  • For primary hyperparathyroidism, sestamibi dual-phase scans with SPECT/CT show sensitivities of 85% on a per-patient basis 5

18F-Choline PET/CT

  • Superior performance for identifying multigland disease, parathyroid hyperplasia, and multiple adenomas compared to traditional scintigraphy 1
  • Particularly valuable when multigland disease is suspected (15-20% of primary hyperparathyroidism cases) 1

Second-Line and Problem-Solving Imaging

4D-CT (CT Neck Without and With IV Contrast)

  • Reserved as a problem-solving technique in challenging cases and after failed neck exploration 4
  • Utilizes multiphase technique (noncontrast, arterial, and venous phases) leveraging unique perfusion characteristics of parathyroid adenomas 5
  • For single-gland disease, sensitivities range from 92% to 94% with positive predictive values of 88% to 92% 5
  • For multigland disease, sensitivities drop to 43% to 67% 5
  • Overall sensitivity ranges from 62% to 88% in retrospective studies 5

MRI Neck

  • Limited data available for primary hyperparathyroidism 5
  • No relevant literature exists for secondary or tertiary hyperparathyroidism 5
  • Sensitivity of 81% reported in older comparative studies 6

Algorithmic Approach by Clinical Context

Single Adenoma (80% of Cases)

  • Start with ultrasound plus sestamibi with SPECT/CT or 18F-choline PET/CT 1
  • Confident preoperative localization enables MIP, which offers shorter operating times, faster recovery, and decreased costs compared to bilateral neck exploration 1

Suspected Multigland Disease (15-20% of Cases)

  • 18F-choline PET/CT is preferred due to superior diagnostic performance for identifying multiple adenomas and hyperplasia 1
  • Consider combining multiple imaging modalities—concordant results from two or more studies improve sensitivity and positive predictive value 5

Persistent or Recurrent Hyperparathyroidism

  • Preoperative imaging is essential as reoperations have lower cure rates and higher complication rates 1
  • If standard imaging (ultrasound, sestamibi, CT) yields nonlocalizing, equivocal, or discordant results, consider selective parathyroid venous sampling for PTH levels 5, 2
  • Venous sampling sensitivities range from 40% to 93% but is invasive and typically reserved for reoperative cases 2

Secondary/Tertiary Hyperparathyroidism

  • Imaging aims to identify all eutopic, ectopic, and supernumerary glands 5
  • CT neck shows sensitivities of 60% to 85% for secondary hyperparathyroidism 5
  • Sestamibi with SPECT/CT demonstrates 85% sensitivity on a per-patient basis 5
  • For tertiary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroidectomy should be considered despite negative imaging 2

Negative Initial Imaging

  • Bilateral neck exploration under general anesthesia is the standard approach when preoperative localization studies are negative 2
  • Consider 4D-CT parathyroid scan (sensitivities 62% to 88%) 2
  • Selective venous sampling may be considered for surgical candidates with non-localizing results 2

Combination Imaging Strategy

  • Multiple imaging modalities used together maximize accuracy through concordant results 5, 1
  • When two or more tests are positive at the same location, sensitivity reaches 79% with positive predictive value of 86% 6
  • Three concordant techniques show 63% sensitivity but 92% positive predictive value 6

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Never use imaging to diagnose hyperparathyroidism—diagnosis is biochemical only 1, 2
  • Failing to consider multigland disease can lead to inadequate treatment, as it is more difficult to localize with standard imaging 1, 2
  • In patients with concurrent thyroid disease, which occurs more frequently in hyperparathyroidism patients, combined ultrasound and scintigraphy is most sensitive 3
  • For ectopic glands in multigland disease, sestamibi dual-phase scans with SPECT show only 29% sensitivity on a per-lesion basis 5

References

Guideline

Parathyroid Imaging for Hyperparathyroidism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Primary Hyperparathyroidism with Negative Imaging

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Parathyroid Imaging.

Radiologic clinics of North America, 2020

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.