What treatment is recommended for an elderly woman with multiple fractures and previous anti-resorption therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment Recommendation for Elderly Woman with Multiple Fractures on Prior Anti-Resorptive Therapy

This patient requires immediate initiation of anabolic therapy with teriparatide or romosozumab, followed by mandatory sequential anti-resorptive treatment, as she represents a very high fracture risk case with treatment failure on prior anti-resorptive medications.

Risk Stratification

This patient meets criteria for very high fracture risk based on:

  • Multiple fragility fractures (two pelvic fractures plus proximal humerus fracture) 1
  • Treatment failure on prior anti-resorptive therapy 2, 3
  • Elderly age with established osteoporosis 1

First-Line Treatment: Anabolic Therapy

Primary Recommendation: Teriparatide

Teriparatide (recombinant PTH 1-34) at 20 mcg subcutaneously once daily is the preferred initial treatment for this very high-risk patient who has failed anti-resorptive therapy 1, 4.

Rationale for anabolic therapy over continuing anti-resorptives:

  • The American College of Rheumatology conditionally recommends PTH/PTHrP over anti-resorptives (bisphosphonates or denosumab) for patients at very high fracture risk 1
  • Prior anti-resorptive therapy blunts the anabolic effect of bone-forming agents, but teriparatide remains effective even in this context 1
  • Teriparatide reduces vertebral fractures by 65% and nonvertebral fractures by 53% in high-risk postmenopausal women 4, 5, 6
  • The patient's multiple fractures while on anti-resorptive therapy indicate inadequate response, making continuation of the same therapeutic class inappropriate 2, 3

Treatment Duration and Monitoring

  • Maximum treatment duration: 2 years (24 months) - teriparatide should not be used for more than 2 years during a patient's lifetime due to osteosarcoma risk observed in rat studies 4
  • Administer with supplemental calcium (1000-1200 mg daily) and vitamin D (800 IU daily or sufficient to maintain 25(OH)D levels ≥30-50 ng/mL) 1, 4
  • Check serum calcium at 1 month after initiation (>16 hours post-dose); mild hypercalcemia may occur but is typically transient 4, 3
  • Initial administration should occur under circumstances where the patient can sit or lie down due to potential orthostatic hypotension 4

Alternative Anabolic Option: Romosozumab

Romosozumab (anti-sclerostin antibody) is an alternative anabolic agent with the following considerations:

  • Limited to exactly 12 monthly subcutaneous doses as the anabolic effect wanes after this period 7
  • May have superior anti-fracture efficacy compared to anti-resorptives in head-to-head studies 8
  • Contraindicated if myocardial infarction or stroke within 12 months 1
  • Requires careful cardiovascular risk assessment including evaluation for untreated hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and smoking 1

Mandatory Sequential Anti-Resorptive Therapy

Critical: Anabolic therapy MUST be followed by anti-resorptive treatment to prevent bone loss 7, 8, 3.

Sequential Therapy Options After Teriparatide/Romosozumab:

Option 1: Oral Bisphosphonates (Preferred for cost and experience)

  • Alendronate or risedronate are first-choice agents due to low cost (generic availability), established efficacy, and extensive clinical experience 1
  • Strongly recommended by the American College of Rheumatology for high/very high fracture risk patients 1
  • Reduce vertebral fractures by 50-70%, nonvertebral by 20-30%, and hip fractures by ~40% 8

Option 2: Intravenous Zoledronic Acid

  • Appropriate for patients with oral intolerance, malabsorption, dementia, or compliance concerns 1
  • Administered annually, improving adherence 1

Option 3: Denosumab (Subcutaneous)

  • Alternative for patients intolerant to bisphosphonates 1
  • Administered every 6 months 8
  • Critical warning: Pronounced rebound effect with clusters of vertebral fractures can occur from 7 months after the last injection if discontinued without transition to another anti-resorptive 8

Duration of Sequential Anti-Resorptive Therapy

  • Bisphosphonates: typically 3-5 years initially, with consideration for drug holidays of 1-2 years after this period to minimize atypical femoral fracture risk 1, 8
  • Continue longer if patient remains at high fracture risk 1
  • Monitor bone mineral density with vertebral fracture assessment every 1-2 years 1

Non-Pharmacological Interventions (Concurrent with All Therapy)

All patients require optimization of:

  • Calcium intake: 1000-1200 mg daily (dietary plus supplementation) 1
  • Vitamin D: 800 IU daily minimum, titrated to maintain serum 25(OH)D ≥30-50 ng/mL 1
  • Smoking cessation if applicable 1
  • Alcohol limitation: ≤2 servings daily 1
  • Weight-bearing or resistance training exercises 1
  • Fall prevention strategies: given her multiple fractures, formal fall risk assessment and intervention are essential 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not combine teriparatide with bisphosphonates concurrently - combination therapy blunts the anabolic effect and provides no additional benefit 3
  • Do not discontinue anabolic therapy without transitioning to anti-resorptive - this leads to rapid bone loss and increased fracture risk 7, 8
  • Do not exceed 2-year lifetime exposure to teriparatide due to theoretical osteosarcoma risk 4
  • Do not use romosozumab beyond 12 months as efficacy diminishes 7
  • Do not start romosozumab without cardiovascular risk assessment 1
  • If using denosumab as sequential therapy, never allow treatment gaps due to severe rebound vertebral fracture risk 8

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.