What is the current evidence for the health benefits of NAD+ (Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) IV therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 21, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

NAD+ IV Therapy: Current Evidence for Health Benefits

There is no credible clinical evidence supporting the use of intravenous NAD+ therapy for any medical condition, and this route of administration is not recommended by any major medical society or guideline. 1, 2, 3

Guideline-Based Recommendations

What Medical Societies Actually Recommend

  • The American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition recommends oral niacin (40 mg/day parenterally only when GI tract is non-functional), NOT intravenous NAD+, for therapeutic purposes in humans 1

  • The American College of Nutrition establishes standard oral niacin intake at 16 mg/day for adult males and 14 mg/day for adult females—these are NAD+ precursors, not direct NAD+ administration 2, 3

  • For patients requiring parenteral nutrition, the established dosing is niacin 40 mg/day (not NAD+) 2, 3

Regulatory Status

  • FDA labeling for intravenous NAD+ lists exclusively cosmetic applications, with no therapeutic medical indications 1

  • There are no FDA-approved injectable NAD+ products for clinical use in the United States 2

  • No published randomized controlled trials exist for NAD+ infusions in humans in medical databases 1

Safety Concerns with IV NAD+

Direct Risks of Injectable Administration

  • Injectable NAD+ bypasses normal protective barriers and introduces significant risks including infection from improper sterile technique, hypersensitivity reactions, and unknown pharmacokinetics when administered parenterally 2, 3

  • No standardized dosing protocols exist for injectable NAD+ administration 2

  • Injectable administration of unapproved substances falls outside standard medical practice 2

Pharmacokinetic Evidence Against IV Use

  • A 2019 pilot study demonstrated that at an infusion rate of 3 μmol/min, NAD+ is rapidly and completely removed from plasma for at least the first 2 hours, with no change in plasma NAD+ or metabolites observed until after 2 hours 4

  • The metabolite profile is consistent with NAD+ glycohydrolase and NAD+ pyrophosphatase activity, meaning the infused NAD+ is immediately broken down rather than utilized intact 4

  • Urinary excretion products include NAD+ itself and methylnicotinamide but not nicotinamide, suggesting inefficient conversion to usable forms 4

Potential Long-Term Risks

  • NAD(P)H oxidase activity has been implicated in anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity, raising theoretical concerns about NAD supplementation in certain clinical contexts 2, 3

  • High doses of nicotinic acid can cause flushing, nausea, vomiting, hepatotoxicity, blurred vision, and impaired glucose tolerance 1

Evidence for Oral NAD+ Precursors (Not IV NAD+)

What Actually Has Some Evidence

  • A 2024 systematic review of oral NADH and precursors (not IV NAD+) in 489 participants showed these were well-tolerated with improvements in quality of life, decreased anxiety, and reduced maximum heart rate after stress testing 5

  • Oral nicotinamide riboside (NR) and nicotinamide mononucleotide (NMN) have been shown safe and significantly increase NAD+ levels in humans, though efficacy is lower than expected from preclinical studies 6

  • Most common side effects with oral NAD+ precursors include muscle pain, nervous disorders, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and headaches—none presenting serious health risks 5

Critical Limitation

  • The efficacy of oral NAD+ precursors in humans is substantially lower than predicted from animal studies, and clinical trial outcomes have been disappointing compared to preclinical data 6

Clinical Algorithm for Patient Requests

Step 1: Recommend Dietary Sources First

  • Prioritize fortified packaged foods, meat and poultry, red fish (tuna and salmon), nuts, legumes, and seeds 1, 3

Step 2: Assess for True Deficiency

  • Measure blood or tissue NAD+ levels only if pellagra symptoms present (diarrhea, dermatitis, dementia) 1
  • Monitor niacin status through urinary metabolites (N-methyl-nicotinamide and N-methyl-2-pyridone-carboxamide) if clinical suspicion exists 3

Step 3: Treat Confirmed Deficiency with Oral Niacin

  • Use oral nicotinic acid (15-20 mg/day) or nicotinamide (300 mg/day) for pellagra treatment 1
  • Do not exceed upper limits: 10 mg/day for free nicotinic acid (based on flushing effects) and 900 mg/day for nicotinamide in adults 1, 2, 3

Step 4: Avoid IV NAD+ Entirely

  • Avoid NAD+ infusions for therapeutic purposes outside of research protocols due to lack of guideline support, poor pharmacokinetics, and absence of proven clinical benefit 1, 2, 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not confuse oral NAD+ precursor supplementation (which has limited evidence) with IV NAD+ administration (which has no credible evidence) 5, 6

  • Do not assume that because NAD+ levels decline with age (correlation coefficient of -0.706 in men and -0.537 in women) that IV supplementation is therefore beneficial or safe 3

  • Recognize that preclinical animal studies showing benefit from "supraphysiological" doses do not translate to human IV injection efficacy 3

  • The American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation does not recommend NAD+ patches due to lack of clinical evidence, reflecting general skepticism toward direct NAD+ delivery methods 1

References

Guideline

NAD-Infusionen: Aktuelle Evidenzlage

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

NAD+ Injectable Administration: Safety and Regulatory Status

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

NAD+ Administration and Safety

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Evaluation of safety and effectiveness of NAD in different clinical conditions: a systematic review.

American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism, 2024

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.