Why is a Salter-Harris type I fracture difficult to diagnose on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 8, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Research

A Salter-Harris type I fracture is difficult to diagnose on MRI primarily because it involves a clean separation through the growth plate (physis) without extending into the adjacent bone, and the growth plate's normal appearance on MRI can mask subtle disruptions within it. This type of fracture presents a diagnostic challenge on MRI because the growth plate itself is already a distinct structure with different signal characteristics from surrounding bone, making subtle disruptions within it hard to detect 1. The growth plate normally appears as a high signal intensity band on T2-weighted images, and when fractured, there may be minimal displacement or edema that can be easily overlooked. Additionally, the normal undulating appearance of the growth plate and its variable thickness throughout development can mask subtle abnormalities. MRI is generally more sensitive for detecting bone marrow edema and soft tissue injuries rather than the clean separations characteristic of Salter-Harris I fractures.

Some key points to consider when diagnosing Salter-Harris type I fractures on MRI include:

  • The growth plate's normal appearance on MRI can make it difficult to detect subtle disruptions within it 1
  • Minimal displacement or edema may be present in Salter-Harris type I fractures, making them hard to detect on MRI
  • Clinical examination findings such as point tenderness over the growth plate, combined with plain radiographs (especially stress views or comparison views with the uninjured side) are often more reliable for diagnosis
  • Follow-up imaging after 7-10 days may reveal periosteal new bone formation that confirms the diagnosis retrospectively. However, a more recent study from 2024 highlights the importance of prompt initiation of physical rehabilitation following such injuries, and the use of MRI to identify concomitant injuries such as ACL tears 2.

It's also important to note that the diagnosis of Salter-Harris type I fractures can be influenced by the presence of concomitant injuries, such as ligamentous sprains and bony contusions, which can be detected on MRI 1. In fact, a study from 2010 found that in cases of suspected Salter-Harris type I fractures, MRI often identified ligamentous sprains and/or bony contusions instead of the fracture itself 1. Therefore, a comprehensive diagnostic approach that includes clinical examination, plain radiographs, and MRI is necessary to accurately diagnose Salter-Harris type I fractures.

Related Questions

Why might a radiologist misdiagnose a Salter-Harris I (Type 1) lateral fracture on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a growth plate fracture when an orthopedic surgeon suggests a bone bruise?
Why might a radiologist misdiagnose a Salter-Harris I (Type 1) lateral fracture on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) as a growth plate fracture when a pediatric orthopedic surgeon suggests a bone bruise?
Why is a Salter-Harris type I fracture often misdiagnosed by radiologists on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)?
Why would a radiologist misdiagnose a Salter-Harris I (Type 1) lateral fracture on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)?
What is the best diagnostic approach for a suspected Salter-Harris type 1 fracture of the distal fibular physis in a 14-year-old male with a lateral ankle injury, where the growth plate is not visible on initial X-ray, and there is concern for potential fracture and displacement, particularly with regards to the anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL) and calcaneofibular ligament (CFL)?
How is mild intestinal ischemia managed on an outpatient basis?
What is the dose of Sumatriptan (Imitrex) for as-needed treatment of migraines?
What is the best course of action for a 78-year-old male with BPH, LUTS, and elevated PSA of 13.3, with Impaired Renal Function?
What is the cause of elevated monocytes, eosinophils, and basophils, such as allergies or parasitic (parasites) infections?
What is the treatment plan for this scenario?
How to manage hyperkalemia in diabetes (Diabetes Mellitus)?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.