Does Suprax (Cefixime) cover Haemophilus influenzae (H. flu) and drug-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Suprax Coverage for H. influenzae and Drug-Resistant Pneumococcus

Suprax (cefixime) provides excellent coverage for H. influenzae, including beta-lactamase-producing strains, but has poor activity against S. pneumoniae and should NOT be used when drug-resistant pneumococcus is a concern. 1

Coverage Against H. influenzae

Cefixime demonstrates potent activity against H. influenzae:

  • Inhibits 90% of H. influenzae strains (both beta-lactamase producers and non-producers) at concentrations less than 0.25 mg/L 2
  • Maintains excellent activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains, which account for approximately 50% of H. influenzae in most geographic areas 1
  • Not destroyed by plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases (TEM and ROB types) produced by Haemophilus species 2
  • FDA-approved for otitis media caused by H. influenzae 3

Coverage Against Drug-Resistant S. pneumoniae

Cefixime has inadequate activity against S. pneumoniae and is especially ineffective against penicillin-resistant strains:

  • Both cefixime and ceftibuten have poor activity against S. pneumoniae and are especially ineffective against penicillin-resistant strains 1
  • Neither of these drugs should be used for acute bacterial sinusitis where pneumococcus is a concern 1
  • Has no clinically significant activity against drug-resistant S. pneumoniae (DRSP) 1
  • May occasionally fail against even penicillin-susceptible pneumococci 1
  • Clinical trials showed approximately 10% lower overall response rates for S. pneumoniae compared to control drugs in otitis media 3

Clinical Implications

When pneumococcal coverage is needed, alternative agents should be selected:

  • Preferred alternatives for DRSP coverage: High-dose amoxicillin (90 mg/kg/day), amoxicillin-clavulanate (90 mg/6.4 mg/kg/day), cefpodoxime, cefdinir, or respiratory fluoroquinolones 1
  • Cefixime maintains bactericidal activity against H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis but does not maintain bactericidal activity against S. pneumoniae 4
  • For infections where both pathogens are possible (e.g., community-acquired pneumonia, sinusitis), cefixime is inappropriate as monotherapy 1

Common Pitfall to Avoid

The major clinical error is using cefixime for respiratory tract infections where S. pneumoniae is a likely pathogen, particularly in areas with high rates of penicillin resistance (25-50% of strains) 1. While cefixime's excellent H. influenzae coverage may seem attractive, the poor pneumococcal activity makes it unsuitable for empiric therapy in most respiratory infections where both organisms are common pathogens.

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.