Which is better for glucose monitoring, AccuChek (glucose meter) or One Touch (glucose meter)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 22, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Glucose Meter Selection: AccuChek vs OneTouch

Both AccuChek and OneTouch meters meet FDA accuracy standards and perform comparably in clinical settings, so the choice should be based on which specific model meets current FDA standards (95% of readings within 15% for home use) rather than brand loyalty. 1

Critical Accuracy Standards for Selection

The most important factor is whether the specific meter model meets FDA accuracy requirements, not the brand name:

  • FDA home use standard: 95% of readings must fall within 15% for all blood glucose in the usable range, and 99% within 20% 1
  • Only 14 of 18 top-selling glucose meters met minimum accuracy requirements in recent Diabetes Technology Society surveillance testing 1
  • Substantial variation exists in accuracy even among widely used systems that are FDA-cleared 1

Head-to-Head Comparison Data

Direct comparison studies show both brands perform well when meeting standards:

  • AccuChek Aviva: 95.3% met ISO criteria, 98.7% of readings in clinically acceptable zones A+B, MARD 7.0% 2
  • OneTouch Ultra systems: 98.2-99.7% of readings in zone A (clinically accurate), met ISO acceptability requirements, CV <5% for precision 3, 4
  • FreeStyle (Abbott) slightly outperformed both in one comparative study with 100% in zones A+B and 96% ISO compliance 2

Practical Selection Algorithm

Step 1: Verify the specific model meets current FDA accuracy standards through the Diabetes Technology Society Blood Glucose Monitoring System Surveillance Program 1

Step 2: Match meter characteristics to patient needs:

  • For visually impaired patients: Select meters with integrated speech that read glucose levels aloud 1
  • For patients with dexterity issues: Choose meters with less painful lancing devices and ability to reapply blood to strips with insufficient initial samples 1
  • For patients with abnormal oxygen saturation: Use glucose dehydrogenase-based meters rather than glucose oxidase-based systems 5

Step 3: Ensure proper use factors:

  • Only use unopened, unexpired test strips from licensed distributors 1, 5
  • Verify strips are properly stored 5
  • Provide extensive training in device use 1

Critical Caveats

Avoid these common pitfalls:

  • Do not assume FDA clearance equals accuracy - many cleared meters fail to meet accuracy standards in independent testing 1
  • Meters perform poorly in ICU settings - neither brand reliably meets CLSI/ISO criteria with arterial blood from critically ill patients 1
  • Interfering substances affect accuracy - glucose oxidase systems are susceptible to multiple pharmacologic interferences 1
  • Used or counterfeit strips give incorrect results - only purchase from pharmacies or licensed distributors 1, 5

Special Population Considerations

For patients with advanced chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis:

  • AccuChek showed 97.9% of readings in zones A+B during hemodialysis days 1
  • Both brands require careful interpretation as accuracy may be affected by anemia, erythropoietin use, and altered red blood cell lifespan 1

The bottom line: Select the specific meter model (regardless of brand) that meets current FDA standards and matches patient-specific needs for features like voice output, ease of use, and strip handling. 1, 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Performance analysis of the OneTouch UltraVue blood glucose monitoring system.

Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2009

Guideline

Blood Glucose Meter Accuracy Standards

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.