What does a DEXA scan indicating osteopenia with a 10-year fracture risk of 9.7% for major osteoporotic fractures and 1.3% for hip fractures mean for a 7-year-old female's bone health?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 23, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Critical Error in DEXA Interpretation for a 7-Year-Old Child

This DEXA scan report is fundamentally incorrect and should be disregarded—T-scores cannot and should not be used in children, and the FRAX calculation is completely invalid for a 7-year-old. 1

Why This Report is Inappropriate

T-Scores Are Not Valid in Children

  • T-scores compare bone density to healthy young adults (peak bone mass), which is completely inappropriate for a 7-year-old child who has not yet reached skeletal maturity. 1
  • The World Health Organization definitions of osteopenia (T-score -1.0 to -2.4) and osteoporosis (T-score ≤-2.5) apply only to postmenopausal women and men aged ≥50 years—never to children. 1
  • In pediatric patients, Z-scores (comparison to age-matched peers) should be used instead, not T-scores. 1

FRAX Is Not Validated for Children

  • The FRAX algorithm was developed and validated exclusively for adults aged 40-90 years and is intended for untreated postmenopausal women and men over age 50. 1, 2
  • FRAX calculations in a 7-year-old are meaningless and clinically dangerous as they could lead to inappropriate treatment decisions. 2
  • The 10-year fracture risk percentages reported (9.7% major osteoporotic fracture, 1.3% hip fracture) have no validity or clinical relevance in a child. 1

What Should Be Done Instead

Proper Pediatric Bone Density Assessment

  • Request a corrected DEXA report using Z-scores compared to age-, sex-, and ethnicity-matched reference data. 1
  • A Z-score ≤-2.0 in children may indicate low bone density for chronological age and warrants further evaluation for secondary causes. 1

Clinical Evaluation Required

  • Investigate for underlying conditions that affect bone health in children:
    • Nutritional deficiencies (calcium, vitamin D)
    • Endocrine disorders (growth hormone deficiency, hypogonadism, hyperthyroidism)
    • Chronic inflammatory conditions
    • Malabsorption syndromes
    • Medications (especially glucocorticoids)
    • Genetic bone disorders
    • Immobilization or lack of weight-bearing activity 1

Appropriate Management for Pediatric Low Bone Density

  • Focus on optimizing bone health through non-pharmacologic interventions:
    • Ensure adequate calcium intake (1000-1300 mg/day for ages 4-8 years)
    • Vitamin D supplementation (600-1000 IU daily)
    • Weight-bearing physical activity
    • Treatment of any identified secondary causes 1
  • Pharmacologic treatment with bisphosphonates in children is reserved for severe cases (such as osteogenesis imperfecta or glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with fractures) and should only be managed by pediatric specialists. 1, 3

Critical Action Steps

Contact the ordering physician and the DEXA facility immediately to:

  1. Report the inappropriate use of T-scores and FRAX in a pediatric patient
  2. Request a corrected report with proper Z-scores
  3. Ensure proper pediatric reference databases are being used
  4. Consider referral to pediatric endocrinology if Z-scores indicate true low bone density for age 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Diagnosis and management of osteoporosis.

The Practitioner, 2015

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.