What is the spectrum of use for cefoperazone (Cefoperazone) and sulbactam (Sulbactam)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 24, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Spectrum of Use for Cefoperazone-Sulbactam

Cefoperazone-sulbactam is a broad-spectrum antibiotic combination effective against Gram-positive, Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic organisms, including beta-lactamase-producing strains, with particular utility for intra-abdominal infections, hospital-acquired pneumonia, and multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. 1, 2

Antimicrobial Coverage

Gram-Negative Organisms

  • Enterobacteriaceae: Effective against E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Proteus mirabilis, Enterobacter cloacae, and Salmonella species, particularly beta-lactamase-producing strains 3, 4, 5
  • Non-fermenting Gram-negatives: Has documented activity against Acinetobacter baumannii, including carbapenem-resistant strains (CRAB), making it a preferred sulbactam-containing regimen for these infections 1, 6
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Cefoperazone has modest anti-pseudomonal activity, but this combination is not considered first-line for Pseudomonas infections—piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, or carbapenems are preferred 6

Gram-Positive Organisms

  • Active against Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-susceptible strains) and streptococcal species 4, 5
  • Not effective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) or vancomycin-resistant enterococci 7

Anaerobic Coverage

  • Provides broad anaerobic coverage, making it suitable for polymicrobial infections involving Bacteroides species and other anaerobes 4, 7

Clinical Indications

Intra-Abdominal Infections

  • Highly effective for community-acquired and healthcare-associated intra-abdominal infections, with clinical efficacy rates of 87.7% in meta-analysis 2
  • Appropriate for moderate-to-severe infections, including peritonitis, intra-abdominal abscesses, and post-surgical infections 2, 3
  • Provides single-agent coverage for mixed aerobic-anaerobic infections without requiring metronidazole 7, 4

Respiratory Tract Infections

  • Recommended for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) where broader coverage is needed, particularly with risk of multidrug-resistant organisms 8, 5
  • Not appropriate as first-line for community-acquired pneumonia in stable patients—ceftriaxone is preferred 8

Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB)

  • Preferred sulbactam-containing regimen for CRAB infections, with the sulbactam component providing intrinsic activity against this organism 1, 6
  • Requires high-dose sulbactam (6-9 g/day) for severe CRAB infections 1
  • Shows lower nephrotoxicity rates compared to polymyxin-based therapies 1

Other Infections

  • Urinary tract infections caused by beta-lactamase-producing organisms 5
  • Skin and soft tissue infections involving mixed flora 4
  • Gynecological infections 4
  • Sepsis/bacteremia (when organism susceptibility is confirmed) 5

Dosing Recommendations

Standard Dosing

  • Moderate infections: 4 g IV every 12 hours (2 g cefoperazone + 2 g sulbactam) 1, 3
  • Severe infections or MDR organisms: 3 g/3 g IV every 8 hours, providing 6-9 g sulbactam daily 1
  • Pediatric dosing: 200-300 mg/kg/day of cefoperazone component divided every 6-8 hours 1

High-Dose Regimens

  • For CRAB infections, administer 9-12 g/day of sulbactam divided into 3-4 doses with 4-hour infusions to optimize pharmacokinetics 1
  • This dosing is particularly effective for isolates with MIC ≤4 mg/L 1

Important Clinical Considerations

When to Choose Cefoperazone-Sulbactam Over Alternatives

  • Healthcare-associated infections with risk factors for ESBL-producing organisms—the sulbactam component provides beta-lactamase protection 8
  • Intra-abdominal infections requiring anaerobic coverage—provides single-agent therapy versus ceftriaxone + metronidazole 8, 2
  • CRAB infections where sulbactam susceptibility is documented (MIC ≤4 mg/L)—preferred over colistin due to lower nephrotoxicity 1

When NOT to Use Cefoperazone-Sulbactam

  • Confirmed ESBL-producing E. coli, Klebsiella, or Proteus species: Despite in vitro susceptibility, carbapenems are preferred based on CLSI guidelines 1
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections: Use piperacillin-tazobactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, or carbapenems as first-line agents 6
  • Community-acquired infections in stable patients: Ceftriaxone is more appropriate and promotes antibiotic stewardship 8
  • Penicillin hypersensitivity: Contraindicated due to cross-reactivity risk 1

Combination Therapy

  • For CRAB bloodstream infections, combining cefoperazone-sulbactam with imipenem-cilastatin shows significantly lower mortality than monotherapy 1
  • Common combinations include tigecycline, polymyxin, doxycycline, or minocycline based on susceptibility testing 1

Safety Profile

  • Generally well-tolerated with similar adverse event rates to comparator antibiotics 2, 3
  • Lower nephrotoxicity compared to polymyxin-based regimens for resistant infections 1
  • Monitor renal function during high-dose therapy, though renal toxicity is less common than with colistin 1
  • Potential for diarrhea, transaminase elevations, and eosinophilia 5

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Underdosing for resistant organisms: Doses <6 g/day sulbactam may be insufficient for severe CRAB infections 1
  • Ignoring local resistance patterns: Always verify susceptibility, particularly for Pseudomonas and ESBL-producers 6, 8
  • Using for third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (3GCephRE): Insufficient evidence exists for this indication—carbapenems remain preferred 7
  • Assuming anti-pseudomonal coverage: This is not a reliable anti-pseudomonal agent despite cefoperazone's modest activity 6

References

Guideline

High-Dose Sulbactam Therapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Sulbactam/cefoperazone versus cefotaxime for the treatment of moderate-to-severe bacterial infections: results of a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 1997

Research

Broad-spectrum beta-lactam antibiotics with beta-lactamase inhibitors.

International journal of antimicrobial agents, 1996

Research

[Clinical studies on sulbactam/cefoperazone in the pediatric field].

The Japanese journal of antibiotics, 1984

Guideline

Cefoperazone-Sulbactam for Pseudomonas Infections

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Antimicrobial Spectrum Comparison of Ceftriaxone and Cefoperazone/Sulbactam

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.