What is the target International Normalized Ratio (INR) for patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) treated with acitrom (acetylsalicylic acid)

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 26, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Target INR for Acitrom in Cerebral Venous Thrombosis

For patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) treated with acitrom (acenocoumarol), target an INR of 2.0-3.0 with an optimal target of 2.5, using the same therapeutic range established for other venous thromboembolic conditions. 1, 2, 3

Therapeutic Range and Rationale

  • The standard INR target of 2.0-3.0 applies to CVT management with vitamin K antagonists including acenocoumarol, based on extrapolation from venous thromboembolism guidelines 4, 5, 6

  • This range balances efficacy in preventing thrombus propagation against bleeding risk, which increases exponentially when INR exceeds 5.0 7

  • Using subtherapeutic INR ranges below 2.0 (such as 1.5-1.9) significantly increases recurrent thrombosis risk with a relative risk of 3.25 and results in 24 additional thrombotic events per 1000 patients 1, 3

Initiation and Bridging Protocol

  • Start therapeutic anticoagulation with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin immediately upon CVT diagnosis 4, 5

  • Begin acenocoumarol simultaneously with parenteral anticoagulation on day 1 of treatment 1, 2

  • Continue heparin bridging for a minimum of 5 days AND until INR reaches ≥2.0 for at least 24 consecutive hours before discontinuing parenteral therapy 1, 2, 5

  • The bridging period is critical because warfarin-type anticoagulants initially create a prothrombotic state through rapid depletion of protein C before achieving therapeutic anticoagulation 1, 3

Monitoring Schedule

  • Check INR daily or every other day during the initial titration phase until therapeutic range is achieved 1

  • After stabilization in therapeutic range, monitor INR weekly for 2-3 weeks 1

  • Transition to less frequent monitoring (every 2-4 weeks) once stable therapeutic anticoagulation is maintained 7

Duration of Anticoagulation

  • For CVT related to a transient reversible risk factor (pregnancy, infection, oral contraceptives), continue anticoagulation for 3 months 4, 5

  • For idiopathic CVT without identified risk factors, extend anticoagulation to 6-12 months minimum 4, 5

  • For patients with severe thrombophilia (two or more prothrombotic abnormalities or antiphospholipid syndrome), consider lifelong anticoagulation 4

Safety in CVT with Hemorrhagic Transformation

  • Anticoagulation with therapeutic INR targets is safe and should be used even in CVT patients with intracranial hemorrhagic lesions on imaging 4

  • The presence of hemorrhagic venous infarction is not a contraindication to full-dose anticoagulation in CVT, unlike other stroke subtypes 4

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use lower INR targets (such as 1.5-1.9 or 1.7-1.8) as these historical ranges are not validated for safety or efficacy and substantially increase recurrent thrombosis risk 1, 3

  • Do not use higher INR ranges (3.0-4.5) for CVT as this increases bleeding risk without additional benefit compared to the standard 2.0-3.0 range 3, 6

  • Do not discontinue heparin prematurely before both the 5-day minimum AND achievement of therapeutic INR for 24 hours, as this creates a dangerous gap in anticoagulation 1, 2

  • Failing to bridge with LMWH when INR becomes subtherapeutic in a patient with recent CVT significantly increases thrombosis risk 1

Evidence Regarding Recanalization

  • Interestingly, one study found that recanalization rates at 3 months in CVT patients on acenocoumarol were similar regardless of whether INR was maintained in therapeutic range (91.7% recanalization overall), though this does not justify subtherapeutic anticoagulation given the increased thrombotic risk 8

  • Clinical outcomes and survival were also similar between adequately and inadequately anticoagulated groups in this single retrospective study, but this should not alter the standard therapeutic target given the established risks of subtherapeutic anticoagulation 8

Acenocoumarol-Specific Dosing

  • For maintenance dosing of acenocoumarol targeting INR 2.0-3.0, typical weight-based doses are: 0.20 mg/kg/day for ages 2 months to 1 year, 0.09 mg/kg/day for ages 1-5 years, 0.07 mg/kg/day for ages 6-10 years, and 0.06 mg/kg/day for ages 11-18 years 9

  • Adjust acenocoumarol dose based on INR results: increase by 20% for INR 1.1-1.4, increase by 10% for INR 1.5-1.9, no change for INR 2.0-3.0, decrease by 10% for INR 3.1-3.5, and hold until INR <3.5 then restart at 20% reduced dose for INR >3.5 9

References

Guideline

Management of Past DVT with Low INR

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Anticoagulation Management in Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Target INR for DVT on Warfarin Therapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Acute treatment of cerebral venous and dural sinus thrombosis.

Current treatment options in neurology, 2008

Research

Impact of anticoagulation status on recanalization and outcome of cerebral venous thrombosis.

Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia, 2021

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.