Calculus Cholecystitis in Males: Increased Surgical Risks and Treatment Approach
Male gender in acute calculus cholecystitis causes significantly higher rates of surgical complications (increasing from 10% to 15%) and a threefold increased risk of conversion to open cholecystectomy (from 16% to 48.5%), likely due to increased visceral abdominal fat, greater trunk skeletal muscle mass making laparoscopic surgery technically more difficult, and delayed presentation from reluctance to seek medical care. 1
Why Males Have Worse Outcomes
The mechanisms behind poorer outcomes in males with calculus cholecystitis are multifactorial 1:
- Anatomical factors: Males have increased visceral abdominal fat and greater skeletal muscle mass, particularly in the trunk, which creates technical challenges during laparoscopic surgery 1
- Behavioral factors: Males commonly delay seeking medical help due to misguided perceptions of masculinity, resulting in more advanced disease at presentation 1
- Combined effect: These factors work synergistically to increase both complication rates and the likelihood of requiring conversion to open surgery 1
Treatment Algorithm for Male Patients
Primary Treatment Approach
Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 24-72 hours after initial conservative management remains the treatment of choice, even in male patients with higher baseline risk. 2 This approach results in:
- Significantly fewer complications compared to delayed surgery or drainage procedures 2
- Better healthcare resource utilization 2
- Lower readmission rates for gallstone-related diseases 2
Risk Stratification Considerations
Male patients require careful preoperative assessment using Tokyo Guidelines (TG13/TG18) severity grading 1:
- TG13 Grade 3 (severe): Mortality risk increases from 1.3% to 6.5% compared to Grade 1 1
- Consider referral: High-volume and specialized centers may decrease complications and mortality in severe cases 1
- Surgical expertise matters: Experienced surgeons should perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy in male patients given the higher conversion risk 1
Intraoperative Safety Measures
Given the increased technical difficulty in males, specific safety steps are critical 3:
- Use of seven intraoperative safety steps to achieve critical view of safety (CVS) 3
- CVS can be achieved in 97.2% of complex cases when systematic safety protocols are followed 3
- Subtotal cholecystectomy should be performed when anatomical identification is difficult to prevent iatrogenic bile duct injuries 2
Alternative Management for High-Risk Males
When Surgery Is Not Immediately Feasible
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) should be reserved only for males who are truly non-surgical candidates or have sepsis from gallbladder empyema. 2 However, this approach has significant limitations:
- PTGBD has a 53% complication rate compared to 5% for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, even in high-risk patients 4, 2
- 49% one-year readmission rate in patients who undergo PTGBD without subsequent cholecystectomy 2
- Only 40% of PTGBD patients ultimately undergo delayed cholecystectomy 2
Predictors of Non-Operative Management Failure
Male patients with the following factors at 24 hours are at high risk for treatment failure 2:
At 48-hour follow-up, additional predictors include 2:
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
Do not delay surgery in male patients based solely on their higher baseline risk—this paradoxically worsens outcomes. 2 Common errors include:
- Overuse of drainage procedures: Males who could safely undergo surgery should not receive PTGBD, as this leads to higher mortality, longer hospital stays, and increased readmissions 2
- Age-based discrimination: Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and effective even in elderly male patients when performed by experienced surgeons 2
- Delayed intervention: Approximately 30% of males with mild acute cholecystitis who avoid cholecystectomy develop recurrent gallstone-related complications during long-term follow-up 1
Antibiotic Coverage
For males undergoing cholecystectomy, ceftriaxone provides appropriate prophylaxis 5:
- Single 1-gram dose preoperatively reduces postoperative infections 5
- Particularly indicated in high-risk males (>70 years, acute cholecystitis, obstructive jaundice, or common duct stones) 5
- Effective throughout the surgical procedure 5
Timing Considerations
Surgery should proceed within 24-72 hours regardless of male gender, as outcomes are similar across different timing intervals when proper protocols are followed. 3 The evidence shows: