What is the significance of a Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) of 104?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: April 9, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

From the Guidelines

The recommended target Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) is 65 mmHg, as it has been shown to have a lower risk of atrial fibrillation, lower doses of vasopressors, and similar mortality compared to higher MAP targets 1.

Key Points to Consider

  • The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines recommend an initial MAP target of 65 mmHg over higher MAP targets, based on moderate-quality evidence 1.
  • Targeting a MAP of 85 mmHg resulted in a significantly higher risk of arrhythmias, but the subgroup of patients with previously diagnosed chronic hypertension had a reduced need for renal replacement therapy (RRT) at this higher MAP 1.
  • A recent pilot trial suggested that, in the subgroup of patients older than 75 years, mortality was reduced when targeting a MAP of 60–65 versus 75–80 mmHg, although the quality of evidence was moderate due to imprecise estimates (wide confidence intervals) 1.

Clinical Implications

  • The choice of MAP target should be individualized to the patient's condition, taking into account factors such as chronic hypertension, age, and comorbidities.
  • Regular monitoring of MAP and adjustment of vasopressor doses as needed is crucial to minimize the risk of complications and optimize patient outcomes.
  • The evidence from the provided studies 1 suggests that a MAP target of 65 mmHg is a reasonable starting point, but may need to be adjusted based on individual patient characteristics and response to treatment.

From the Research

Overview of Antibiotic Prescriptions

  • The study 2 found that the most common antibiotics prescribed were azithromycin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, doxycycline, amoxicillin, fluoroquinolones, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
  • The most common indications for antibiotic prescriptions were acute respiratory tract infection, urinary tract infection, skin and soft tissue infection, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation.

Inappropriate Antibiotic Prescriptions

  • The study 2 found that 76% of reviewed prescriptions were inappropriate, with 49.7% of cases having no indication for an antibiotic, 12.3% having an antibiotic indicated but the prescribed agent being guideline discordant, and 14% having a guideline-concordant antibiotic given for a guideline-discordant duration.
  • Ciprofloxacin and azithromycin were most likely to be prescribed inappropriately.

Comparison of Antibiotics

  • The study 3 compared azithromycin extended release and amoxicillin/clavulanate for the treatment of acute sinusitis, finding that more patients randomized to azithromycin extended release experienced symptom resolution at day 5.
  • The study 4 found that amoxicillin-clavulanate, azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin, and cephalexin were associated with cases of drug-induced liver injury, with amoxicillin-clavulanate having the highest number of cases.

Treatment of Specific Infections

  • The study 5 discussed the management of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections, highlighting the limited choices of antibiotics and the emergent resistance of the pathogen.
  • The study 6 reviewed the penetration of different antibiotics into bone and joint tissues, finding that most antibiotics showed good penetration, but few exceptions included penicillin and metronidazole.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Antibiotic penetration into bone and joints: An updated review.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.