How is a patient's management guided by their Pulmonary Embolism (PE) score?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Management of Pulmonary Embolism Based on PE Score

Low-risk PE patients (PESI Class I/II or sPESI=0) should be managed as outpatients with direct oral anticoagulants (apixaban or rivaroxaban), while intermediate-risk patients (PESI Class III or higher) require inpatient management with standard anticoagulation and close monitoring, and high-risk patients (hemodynamically unstable) need immediate inpatient management with consideration of thrombolytic therapy. 1, 2

Risk Stratification Framework

The PESI score stratifies patients into five classes (I-V) based on 11 clinical variables including age, vital signs, comorbidities, and clinical findings. 3, 2 The score demonstrates excellent discriminatory power with area under the ROC curve of 0.77-0.87 for predicting 30-day mortality. 3, 2

Key mortality rates by PESI class:

  • Class I (very low risk): ≤1.6% 30-day mortality 3, 2
  • Class II (low risk): 3.6% 30-day mortality 3, 2
  • Classes III-V (intermediate to high risk): 7.1% to 23.9% 30-day mortality 3

The simplified PESI (sPESI) uses six binary variables (age >80, cancer, chronic cardiopulmonary disease, pulse ≥110, systolic BP <100, oxygen saturation <90%), with a score of 0 identifying low-risk patients with 30-day mortality of 1.0-1.1%. 3, 1

Management Algorithm by Risk Category

Low-Risk Patients (PESI I/II or sPESI=0)

Outpatient management is appropriate when exclusion criteria are absent. 1, 2 Mandatory exclusion criteria include: physiologic instability, active bleeding or recent major bleeding risk, severe renal impairment, and social factors precluding safe discharge. 1

Anticoagulation options for outpatient management:

  • Single-drug regimens: apixaban or rivaroxaban (preferred, no LMWH lead-in required) 1, 2
  • LMWH bridge regimens: LMWH plus dabigatran or LMWH plus edoxaban 2

Critical implementation requirements:

  • Same-day anticoagulation initiation before discharge 1
  • Consultant or senior clinician review before discharge 2
  • Robust pathway for follow-up and monitoring 3, 2
  • Same-day investigation ideally completed 2

Intermediate-Risk Patients (PESI III or Higher with sPESI ≥1)

Inpatient management with standard anticoagulation and close monitoring is required. 1, 4 These patients need further stratification based on right ventricular dysfunction and cardiac biomarkers. 1

Initial anticoagulation strategy:

  • Start anticoagulation immediately without waiting for complete diagnostic confirmation 4
  • Use LMWH or fondaparinux for most intermediate-risk patients 4
  • Reserve unfractionated heparin for high bleeding risk or severe renal dysfunction 4

Transition to oral anticoagulation:

  • DOACs (apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban) strongly preferred over vitamin K antagonists 4
  • Apixaban and rivaroxaban offer single-drug regimens without LMWH lead-in 4
  • Dabigatran and edoxaban require initial parenteral anticoagulation before transitioning 4

Monitoring and escalation:

  • Close monitoring for clinical deterioration with assessment of RV function by imaging or biomarkers 4
  • Routine primary thrombolysis is NOT recommended for stable intermediate-risk PE 4
  • Rescue thrombolytic therapy is strongly recommended if hemodynamic deterioration develops despite anticoagulation 4
  • Recalculate PESI at 48 hours (PESI-48) to identify candidates for early discharge 4

Hemodynamic support if needed:

  • Supplemental oxygen for hypoxemia (SaO2 <90%), but avoid aggressive fluid challenges which may worsen RV failure 4
  • Vasopressor support with norepinephrine and/or dobutamine if hemodynamic compromise develops, signaling need for rescue thrombolysis 4

High-Risk Patients (Hemodynamically Unstable)

Immediate inpatient management with consideration of thrombolytic therapy is required. 3, 1 Overwhelming consensus supports treating hemodynamically unstable patients with confirmed PE when benefits outweigh risks. 3

Critical Exceptions and Nuances

Right heart thrombus represents a critical exception where anatomic location significantly impacts prognosis, with mortality of 21% versus 11% without right heart thrombi. 1 Thrombolytic therapy is the only treatment independently associated with decreased mortality in this subset. 1

Concomitant DVT is an adverse prognostic factor independently associated with 30-day all-cause mortality (OR 1.9,95% CI 1.5-2.4). 1

Additional biomarkers for risk refinement:

  • High-sensitivity troponin and sPESI combination may identify extremely low-risk patients (0% complicated outcomes when both sPESI=0 and hsTnT <14 pg/mL) 3
  • However, sPESI alone had 100% negative predictive value in some cohorts, so adding hsTnT may not improve identification of very low-risk patients 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

Do not rely solely on RV dilation on imaging to exclude patients from outpatient management. 1 If RV dilation is present, measure cardiac biomarkers (BNP/troponin) for additional risk stratification. 1

Do not use routine bleeding risk scores beyond the exclusion criteria already outlined for patients deemed low-risk by PESI/sPESI. 1

Do not discharge patients without same-day anticoagulation. 1

Do not delay anticoagulation while awaiting complete diagnostic confirmation in intermediate-risk patients. 4

Do not prescribe DOACs to patients with severe renal impairment, pregnancy, or antiphospholipid syndrome. 4

Do not use routine thrombolysis in stable intermediate-risk patients, as bleeding risk outweighs benefit. 4

References

Guideline

Pulmonary Embolism Management Based on PESI Score

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Management of Pulmonary Embolism Based on PESI Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Treatment Guidelines for Medium Risk PESI Score Pulmonary Embolism

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Related Questions

What scoring system is used to check for pulmonary embolism?
What is the next step in managing a patient with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) and a moderate-to-high probability Wells score?
What is the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pulmonary embolism (PE)?
What is the approach to managing a patient with suspected pulmonary embolism (PE)?
What is the appropriate management plan for a patient with a subsegmental pulmonary embolus who has stabilized after initial treatment?
What is the survival advantage of Dose-Adjusted (DA) R-EPOCH (Rituximab, Etoposide, Prednisone, Oncovin, Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin) versus R-CHOP (Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Hydroxydaunorubicin, Oncovin, Prednisone) in high-grade lymphomas?
What are the optimal non-invasive ventilator settings for patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) exacerbation, Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) with pulmonary edema, pneumonia, Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome (OHS), asthma exacerbation, and post-operative respiratory failure?
Is a topical steroid necessary for pruritic skin rashes when treating with cetirizine (antihistamine) 20 mg once daily (OD) and prednisone (corticosteroid) 40 mg with a tapering dose?
What is the management of pembrolizumab (pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 antibody)-induced pneumonitis, including the use of prednisone (a corticosteroid)?
What topical corticosteroid (steroid) is recommended for pruritic skin rashes?
What is the meaning and story behind the doctor symbol, Rod of Asclepius?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.