What are the recommended X-ray views for evaluating the nose and maxillary area?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 27, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended X-ray Views for Nose and Maxillary Area

For evaluating the nose and maxillary area, the Waters view (30-degree occipitomental) is the single most important radiographic view, demonstrating the maxillary sinuses optimally, while the Caldwell view (posteroanterior) provides complementary information for the frontal sinuses and ethmoid air cells. 1

Standard Radiographic Views

Waters View (Occipitomental)

  • The Waters view is the primary and most reliable radiograph for maxillary sinus evaluation, with sensitivity of 67.7% and specificity of 87.6% for detecting maxillary sinus pathology 2
  • This single view can serve as a viable diagnostic substitute for a complete 4-view sinus series in many patients, as acute sinusitis commonly involves the maxillary sinuses 1
  • For maxillofacial trauma screening, a single 30-degree occipitomental view is sufficient to detect all clinically significant injuries, eliminating the need for additional views 3
  • The Waters view demonstrates the maxillary sinuses, zygomatic arches, and orbital floors with optimal clarity 1, 4

Caldwell View (Posteroanterior)

  • The Caldwell view demonstrates the frontal and ethmoid sinuses 1
  • This view performs well for detecting frontal and ethmoidal opacification with sensitivity of 89.47% and 100% respectively 4
  • However, the Caldwell view has limited sensitivity (51.43-60.84%) for detecting mucosal thickening in frontal and ethmoidal sinuses 4

Lateral View

  • Lateral views visualize the sphenoid sinus and adenoids in children 1
  • For facial trauma, lateral views add minimal clinical value, as they fail to demonstrate facial abnormalities even when significant bony injury is present on Waters views 3

Important Clinical Context

Limitations of Standard Radiography

  • Standard radiographs have poor sensitivity for ethmoid disease, missing approximately 20% of cases where ethmoid involvement occurs without maxillary sinus infection 1
  • The fine bony anatomy of the ethmoid sinuses is not well visualized on any standard radiographs due to structural superimposition 1
  • Radiographs miss 12% of maxillofacial fractures compared to CT 1
  • For nasal bone fractures specifically, radiographs have limited diagnostic accuracy (53-82%) and do not significantly alter diagnosis or management 1

When CT is Preferred

  • CT has largely replaced radiographs for midface injuries and is the imaging technique of choice for preoperative evaluation 1
  • High-resolution CT is superior for demonstrating ostiomeatal complex anatomy, extent of disease, and surgical planning 1
  • Standard radiographs are of limited value for chronic sinusitis evaluation and are inadequate for clarifying the need for endoscopic surgery 1

Clinical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely on radiographs alone when symptoms are vague or physical findings are equivocal—imaging should only provide confirmatory evidence when clinical disease persists despite optimal medical therapy 1
  • Mild-to-moderate mucosal thickening on radiographs is a nonspecific finding; only sinus opacification, air-fluid levels, or severe mucosal thickening likely reflect meaningful pathology 1
  • The decision to treat with antibiotics should be made on clinical grounds alone, as radiographic extent of disease correlates poorly with likelihood of resolution without medical therapy 1
  • Both patient positioning and technical expertise are essential for obtaining diagnostic quality radiographs 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.