Suture Selection Guide
For emergency laparotomy and most surgical closures, use slowly absorbable monofilament sutures (such as Monocryl or PDS) with a continuous "small bite" technique and maintain a 4:1 suture-to-wound length ratio to minimize incisional hernia and wound complications. 1
Absorbable vs Non-Absorbable Sutures
When to Use Absorbable Sutures
- Absorbable sutures are preferred for fascial closure in emergency and elective laparotomy because they reduce postoperative pain compared to non-absorbable options, though evidence shows no significant difference in incisional hernia or surgical site infection rates between the two 1
- Slowly absorbable synthetic sutures (e.g., Vicryl, Monocryl, PDS, Maxon) are strongly recommended over rapidly absorbable materials with high-quality evidence showing lower incisional hernia rates 1, 2
- Avoid catgut sutures entirely—they cause more pain and require resuturing more frequently than synthetic alternatives 2, 3
When to Use Non-Absorbable Sutures
- Non-absorbable sutures (e.g., Nylon, Prolene, silk) are appropriate for skin closure requiring removal and situations where permanent tensile strength is needed 4, 5
- Polypropylene (Prolene) maintains consistent tensile strength over time in both clean and contaminated conditions 6
- Non-absorbable sutures typically cause inflammatory reactions that lead to fibrous encapsulation; excessive reaction can cause chronic inflammation or suture extrusion 5
Monofilament vs Multifilament Sutures
Monofilament Advantages
- Monofilament sutures (Monocryl, PDS, Prolene, Nylon) cause less bacterial seeding and lower tissue resistance during passage 2, 3, 5
- Particularly beneficial for hand lacerations and high-mobility areas where infection risk is elevated 3
- Lower friction reduces tissue trauma during placement 5
Multifilament Considerations
- Multifilament sutures (Vicryl, silk) provide higher tensile strength and flexibility but increase tissue friction 5
- Braided materials pose higher risks of suture sinus formation and infection 5
- For cesarean subcuticular closure, 4-0 Vicryl and 4-0 Monocryl show comparable surgical site infection rates (6.1% vs 5.1%, p=0.58), making either acceptable based on surgeon preference 7
Specific Suture Applications by Procedure
Abdominal Wall Closure (Emergency/Elective Laparotomy)
- Use slowly absorbable monofilament sutures with continuous running technique 1, 2
- Maintain suture-to-wound length ratio ≥4:1 (Jenkins Rule) to significantly reduce incisional hernia and wound complications 1, 2
- Apply "small bite" technique: 5mm from wound edge, 5mm between stitches, including only aponeurosis to prevent tissue devitalization and wound edge separation 1, 2, 3
- Avoid "large bite" technique (>10mm spacing) as it includes fat and muscle, leading to tissue compression, damage, and increased hernia risk 1
Hand and Finger Lacerations
- Use 4-0 or 5-0 monofilament absorbable sutures to reduce bacterial seeding while eliminating painful suture removal 3
- Leave sutures in place 10-14 days (12-14 days for thumb webbing) due to high mobility and tension 3
- Avoid locking sutures—they cause excessive tension leading to tissue edema and necrosis 3
- Consider subcuticular closure for final layer to minimize scarring 3
Cesarean Skin Closure
- Either 4-0 Vicryl or 4-0 Monocryl for subcuticular closure are acceptable with equivalent wound complication rates 7
- Subcuticular suture closure is superior to staples for reducing wound complications 7
Enhanced Suture Materials
Triclosan-Coated Sutures
- Triclosan-coated sutures significantly reduce surgical site infection prevalence compared to non-coated sutures (Grade of Recommendation 1B) 2
- Consider for contaminated or high-risk cases 2
Critical Technical Points
Suture Sizing
- Use the smallest suture size that accomplishes the purpose to minimize tissue trauma and foreign material 5
- Tensile strength is limited by suture size—balance between adequate strength and minimal tissue reaction 5
Contaminated Fields
- Tensile strength reduction over time does not differ significantly between clean and contaminated conditions for silk, Prolene, Vicryl, or PDS 6
- Silk shows significantly more severe macroscopic inflammation under contaminated conditions (p=0.03), while monofilament and synthetic multifilament sutures show no significant difference 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never use rapidly absorbable sutures for fascial closure—they significantly increase incisional hernia rates 1
- Avoid catgut in all circumstances—synthetic alternatives are superior 2, 3
- Do not use suture-to-wound ratios <4:1—this dramatically increases hernia and wound complication risk 1, 2
- Avoid locking continuous sutures in hand lacerations—causes tissue necrosis 3