Can a 1cm discrepancy in fetal length between two ultrasounds (ultrasound scans) performed 4 weeks apart be due to a different sonographer (ultrasound technician) performing the scan?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 28, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Ultrasound Measurement Variability Between Sonographers

Yes, a 1cm discrepancy in fetal length measurements between two ultrasounds performed 4 weeks apart can absolutely be due to different sonographers performing the scans, as inter-operator variability is a well-documented phenomenon in prenatal ultrasound. 1

Evidence for Sonographer-Specific Measurement Variation

Research trials have demonstrated that important differences in ultrasound measurements exist between sonographers, with studies showing that the use of a single master set of medians was associated with lower screening performance than sonographer-specific medians. 1 This directly confirms that different operators can produce systematically different measurements even when properly trained.

  • Guidelines from Genetics in Medicine explicitly acknowledge that "it may not be necessary (or possible) to achieve the uniform performance level required to allow use of only one universal set of medians" across all sonographers. 1

  • Quality assurance programs monitor individual sonographer performance using three epidemiological parameters, with acceptable median measurements ranging from 0.90 to 1.10 MoM (multiples of the median), indicating that a 10% variation between operators is considered within acceptable limits. 1

Additional Sources of Measurement Discrepancy

Beyond operator variability, several technical factors can contribute to measurement differences:

  • Fetal positioning and flexion: The actual measurement technique matters significantly—in cases of curved structures, measuring the actual length versus the linear distance between endpoints can yield different results. 2

  • Equipment differences: Inferior ultrasound equipment or different machines between facilities can produce measurement variations. 1

  • Measurement timing within growth intervals: Due to inherent variability and standard deviations in measurements, growth assessments should typically be performed no more frequently than every 2 weeks to allow meaningful interval change. 1

Clinical Context and Reassurance

For routine fetal biometry, measurement accuracy in the second and third trimesters is approximately ±10 days when using composite measurements. 3, 4 A 1cm discrepancy in a single measurement parameter over 4 weeks falls within expected measurement variability and does not necessarily indicate abnormal growth.

  • The International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology emphasizes that fetal growth is a dynamic process requiring at least two scans separated in time, and that interval growth assessment is more clinically meaningful than isolated measurements. 4

  • Serial scans should be used to determine if interval growth has been normal rather than recalculating gestational age with each scan. 4

Recommended Action

If there is concern about the measurement discrepancy, request that the same sonographer perform the next ultrasound examination, or ensure that measurements are interpreted using sonographer-specific or center-specific reference medians rather than universal standards. 1 This approach accounts for systematic differences between operators while maintaining appropriate clinical surveillance.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Management of Fetus with Short Femur Length

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Determining the Due Date in Pregnancy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

ISUOG Practice Guidelines: ultrasound assessment of fetal biometry and growth.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2019

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.