What are the generic alternatives to Eliquis (apixaban)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 29, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Generic Alternatives to Eliquis (Apixaban)

There is currently no FDA-approved generic version of Eliquis (apixaban) available in the United States, and you should not substitute it with other direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as they are distinct medications with different dosing, pharmacokinetics, and clinical profiles.

Understanding the Medication Class

Apixaban belongs to the class of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), specifically as a direct factor Xa inhibitor 1. While there are other medications in this same therapeutic class, they are not generic equivalents but rather alternative branded medications with their own distinct properties 1.

Available Alternative DOACs (Not Generics)

If cost or availability is a concern, the following are alternative branded DOACs that may be considered, though they require separate prescribing decisions:

Direct Factor Xa Inhibitors (Same Mechanism as Apixaban)

  • Rivaroxaban (Xarelto®): Has 66% renal excretion and requires once-daily dosing for most indications, with 15-20 mg doses requiring administration with food 1
  • Edoxaban (Lixiana®): Has 50% renal clearance and once-daily dosing, with dose reduction required for patients with CrCl 15-50 mL/min, weight ≤60 kg, or on P-glycoprotein inhibitors 1

Direct Thrombin Inhibitor (Different Mechanism)

  • Dabigatran (Pradaxa®): Has 80% renal elimination and requires twice-daily dosing, with significantly higher renal dependence than apixaban 1

Critical Differences Between Apixaban and Alternatives

Apixaban has the lowest renal clearance (27%) among DOACs, making it potentially preferable in patients with renal impairment compared to dabigatran (80% renal) or rivaroxaban (33% renal) 1.

Key Pharmacokinetic Distinctions:

  • Bioavailability: Apixaban 50% vs. rivaroxaban 66-100% (with food) vs. edoxaban 62% 1
  • Half-life: Apixaban ~12 hours vs. rivaroxaban 5-13 hours vs. dabigatran 12-17 hours 1
  • Metabolism: Apixaban primarily hepatic (73% non-renal) vs. rivaroxaban and dabigatran with higher renal dependence 1

Important Clinical Caveats

These medications are NOT interchangeable without careful consideration of the following factors 1:

  • Indication-specific dosing: Each DOAC has different approved doses for atrial fibrillation, VTE treatment, and VTE prophylaxis 1
  • Renal function: Dose adjustments differ significantly between agents, particularly in CrCl 15-50 mL/min 1
  • Drug interactions: All DOACs interact with P-glycoprotein inhibitors, but only Xa inhibitors are affected by CYP3A4 inhibitors 1
  • Food requirements: Rivaroxaban 15-20 mg doses must be taken with food, while apixaban does not require this 1

When Switching May Be Considered

If a switch from apixaban to another DOAC is being contemplated due to cost or availability, the American Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association guidelines suggest that all four DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) have demonstrated efficacy in stroke prevention for atrial fibrillation 1. However, apixaban demonstrated superior safety with lower major bleeding rates compared to warfarin in the ARISTOTLE trial 1.

For patients with severe renal impairment (CrCl 15-29 mL/min), apixaban or edoxaban may be preferable over rivaroxaban or dabigatran due to their lower renal clearance and established dose-reduction algorithms 1.

Bottom Line for Clinical Practice

  • No true generic apixaban exists currently
  • Alternative DOACs are separate medications requiring new prescriptions with different dosing
  • Apixaban's favorable renal profile (27% renal clearance) and twice-daily dosing with no food requirement distinguishes it from alternatives 1
  • Any switch between DOACs should account for indication, renal function, drug interactions, and patient-specific bleeding/thrombotic risk 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.