Variable Extrathoracic Upper Airway Obstruction
The most likely diagnosis is variable extrathoracic upper airway obstruction, with vocal cord dysfunction being the most common etiology in this clinical scenario. 1
Key Diagnostic Features
The combination of normal FEV1 and FVC with a flattened inspiratory loop is pathognomonic for variable extrathoracic upper airway obstruction. 1 This pattern occurs because:
- The obstruction worsens during inspiration due to negative intraluminal pressure collapsing the extrathoracic airway 1
- Expiratory parameters remain normal because positive intraluminal pressure during expiration keeps the airway open 1
- The European Respiratory Society confirms that a repeatable plateau of forced inspiratory flow with preserved expiratory flow indicates variable extrathoracic central or upper airway obstruction 1
Confirmatory Diagnostic Approach
Direct laryngoscopy is the definitive diagnostic test for evaluating this condition and should be performed to identify the specific etiology. 1 This allows direct visualization of:
- Vocal cord dysfunction (most common cause) 2
- Paradoxical vocal cord motion during inspiration 1, 3
- Laryngeal pathology 1
- Dynamic airway collapse 1
- Structural abnormalities 1
Supporting Spirometric Ratios
Additional spirometric indices that support this diagnosis include:
- FEV1/PEF ratio >8-10 ml/L/min suggests central or upper airway obstruction 1, 3, 4
- MEF50/MIF50 ratio >4 is highly suggestive of variable extrathoracic obstruction, particularly from vocal cord pathology 3, 4
- In bilateral vocal cord paralysis specifically, an FEV1/PEF ratio >10 ml/L/min combined with MEF50/MIF50 >4 is characteristic 3
Common Etiologies to Consider
In the appropriate clinical context, consider:
- Vocal cord dysfunction - the most frequently identified diagnosis when abnormal inspiratory curves are properly evaluated 2
- Bilateral vocal cord paralysis - characterized by paradoxical vocal cord behavior during forced respiration 3
- Functional laryngeal obstruction 1
- Subglottic stenosis 1
- Laryngeal pathology 1
Critical Pitfalls to Avoid
- Do not diagnose asthma based on dyspnea alone, as the normal expiratory findings and FEV1/FVC ratio effectively rule out lower airway obstruction 1
- Ensure maximal patient effort during spirometry, as submaximal inspiratory effort can create a pseudo-plateau that mimics true obstruction 1
- Review multiple flow-volume loops - if one inspiratory curve shows abnormality, examine all curves from that testing session, as consistently abnormal curves warrant both anatomical and functional evaluation 2
- Bronchodilator testing is not indicated in this scenario, as the problem is anatomic or functional upper airway obstruction, not bronchospasm 1
Clinical Context
Studies show that abnormal inspiratory curves occur in approximately 4.6% of pulmonary function tests, yet evaluation of the underlying etiology is undertaken in only 17% of all patients and 30% of those with consistently abnormal curves. 2 This represents a significant missed diagnostic opportunity, as a specific etiology can be identified in 52% of properly evaluated patients. 2