What is the likely diagnosis for a patient with a nonenhancing, T2-hyperintense lesion in the motor cortex, presenting with progressive fine-motor impairment, tremors, and weakness?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Diagnosis: Low-Grade Glioma (WHO Grade II)

The most likely diagnosis is a low-grade diffuse glioma (WHO Grade II), specifically an astrocytoma or oligodendroglioma, given the nonenhancing T2-hyperintense lesion in the motor cortex with progressive fine-motor impairment, tremors, and weakness. 1, 2

Key Diagnostic Features Supporting Low-Grade Glioma

The clinical and radiological presentation is characteristic of low-grade glioma:

  • Nonenhancing T2-hyperintense lesion in motor cortex is the classic MRI appearance of WHO Grade II diffuse glioma, which typically presents as T1-hypointense, T2-hyperintense lesions without contrast enhancement 1, 2
  • Progressive neurological symptoms (fine-motor impairment, tremors, weakness) correlating with motor cortex involvement indicate a slowly growing infiltrative process rather than acute pathology 1, 3
  • Superficial cortical location is typical for low-grade gliomas, particularly angiocentric gliomas and diffuse astrocytomas 1

Critical Differential Diagnoses to Exclude

While low-grade glioma is most likely, several entities must be systematically excluded:

Multiple Sclerosis (Less Likely)

  • MS lesions are typically periventricular, juxtacortical, or infratentorial, not isolated to motor cortex 4, 5
  • MS requires dissemination in space: at least 3 of 4 criteria including ≥1 infratentorial lesion, ≥1 juxtacortical lesion, ≥3 periventricular lesions 4
  • A single cortical lesion does not meet MS diagnostic criteria 4, 5
  • Progressive motor symptoms without relapsing-remitting pattern argues against MS 4

NTRK-Fused Fibroblastic Tumor (Rare but Important)

  • Can present as T2-hyperintense lesion in temporal/cortical regions mimicking low-grade glioma 6
  • Requires molecular testing (NTRK fusion panel) for definitive diagnosis 6
  • Critical to identify due to availability of selective kinase inhibitor therapies 6

Acute Stroke Mimics

  • Distribution inconsistent with vascular territory and progressive (not acute) onset excludes stroke 7
  • DWI restriction would be expected in acute infarction, not typical for low-grade glioma 7

Diagnostic Algorithm

Immediate Imaging Requirements

  • Complete brain MRI with gadolinium contrast to assess enhancement patterns and exclude higher-grade features 4, 1
  • T2-weighted and FLAIR sequences with 3mm slice thickness to characterize lesion extent 4, 1
  • Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to exclude acute ischemic process 7
  • Gradient-echo sequences to exclude vascular malformations (look for flow voids or blooming artifact) 8

Tissue Diagnosis is Mandatory

  • Histopathological analysis of surgical specimen is required for definitive diagnosis of low-grade diffuse glioma 2
  • Resection specimen preferred over biopsy to minimize sampling error, as these tumors can have heterogeneous histology 2
  • Frozen section and cytopathologic/smear evaluation should be used intraoperatively 2

Essential Molecular Testing

  • IDH1 R132H immunohistochemistry and/or IDH1/2 mutation sequencing is highly specific for low-grade diffuse glioma and mandatory for classification and prognosis 2
  • 1p/19q loss-of-heterozygosity testing (by FISH, array-CGH, or PCR) is required for oligodendroglial tumors for prognosis and treatment planning 2
  • Ki-67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry is recommended for prognostic assessment 2
  • NTRK fusion panel should be considered, especially in younger patients, given therapeutic implications 6

Critical Management Considerations

Avoid "Wait and See" Approach

  • Acute malignant transformation to glioblastoma can occur even in asymptomatic patients with untreated low-grade glioma 3
  • One case demonstrated sudden acceleration of growth rate with development of contrast enhancement and transformation to glioblastoma within 5 months, despite patient remaining asymptomatic 3
  • Earlier surgical resection should be considered systematically rather than observation, as lack of symptoms does not protect from malignant transformation 3

Surgical Planning

  • Awake craniotomy with intraoperative electrical mapping is recommended for motor cortex lesions to maximize resection while preserving function 3
  • Goal is maximal safe resection (>90% of FLAIR abnormality) as extent of resection impacts prognosis 3

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume acute stroke based on sudden symptom onset—DLGGs can present with acute neurological deficits and may be misdiagnosed as stroke 7
  • Do not delay tissue diagnosis—imaging alone cannot reliably distinguish low-grade glioma from other entities 2
  • Do not overlook molecular testing—IDH mutation status and 1p/19q codeletion are essential for accurate classification, prognosis, and treatment decisions 2

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.