Can C Peptide (Connecting Peptide) levels increase with treatment?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 30, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can C-Peptide Increase with Treatment?

Yes, C-peptide levels can increase with certain treatments, particularly in recent-onset type 1 diabetes when immunosuppressive therapy preserves beta cell function, though this is not standard practice and most diabetes treatments do not directly increase C-peptide production.

Evidence for C-Peptide Increase with Treatment

Immunosuppressive Therapy in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes

  • Cyclosporin A treatment in recent-onset type 1 diabetes significantly increased C-peptide levels at 3 and 6 months, with sustained elevation maintained over 18-24 months of treatment 1
  • This resulted in 44% remission rate (vs. 21.6% without cyclosporin) with mean remission duration of 10.0 months (vs. 4.4 months without treatment) 1
  • The initial recovery in insulin secretory capacity was maintained throughout the study period in cyclosporin-treated patients, while non-treated patients showed declining C-peptide levels over time 1

Important Context: Current Standard Practice

  • There are currently no FDA-approved therapies for preservation of C-peptide or delaying progression of clinical type 1 diabetes 2
  • Several therapies including verapamil and monoclonal antibodies are under active investigation for C-peptide preservation 2
  • Higher C-peptide levels are associated with better A1C, lower risk of retinopathy, lower risk of nephropathy, and lower risk of severe hypoglycemia 2

C-Peptide Response to Standard Insulin Therapy

Key Clinical Principle

  • The presence or absence of measurable C-peptide levels does not correlate with response to intensive insulin therapy in people with clinically insulin-deficient diabetes 2
  • Standard insulin therapy does not increase endogenous C-peptide production—it replaces deficient insulin but does not restore beta cell function 3

Natural Course Without Intervention

  • In type 1 diabetes, C-peptide levels may initially increase during the "honeymoon period" (first 3-6 months after diagnosis) as inflammation subsides, but this occurs independent of treatment 1
  • Without immunomodulatory intervention, C-peptide levels inexorably decline as autoimmune destruction continues 1

Clinical Implications for Practice

When to Measure C-Peptide

  • Do not measure C-peptide within 2 weeks of a hyperglycemic emergency, as results will be unreliable 3
  • For insulin-treated patients, C-peptide must be measured prior to insulin discontinuation to exclude severe insulin deficiency 3
  • A random C-peptide sample within 5 hours of eating can replace formal stimulation testing for diabetes classification 3

Interpretation of Changes Over Time

  • In latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA), C-peptide decreases over time in parallel with classical type 1 diabetes despite treatment 4
  • Persistence of C-peptide is an important clinical feature of MODY and type 2 diabetes, distinguishing these from type 1 diabetes 4, 5
  • C-peptide levels at 3 months of treatment are proportional to remission rates in both treated and untreated recent-onset type 1 diabetes 1

Critical Caveats

Treatment Selection Based on C-Peptide

  • A low C-peptide value should not be required for insulin pump coverage in individuals with type 2 diabetes 2
  • Patients with low C-peptide levels (<0.2 nmol/L) who received insulin had the best clinical outcomes, while those with normal-to-high C-peptide levels who received insulin had the worst outcomes 6
  • This suggests phenotype-targeted therapy (matching insulin use to C-peptide status) may be important for optimizing outcomes 6

Re-evaluation of Therapy

  • Regular re-evaluation of therapeutic management is necessary, as some elderly diabetic patients on insulin with detectable C-peptide may be successfully transitioned to oral agents 7
  • Serum C-peptide level alone did not predict successful withdrawal from insulin, but adequate dietary regimen appeared important 7

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

C-peptide Testing for Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

[The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in diabetology].

Pediatric endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism, 2015

Research

The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2013

Research

Effect of interactions between C peptide levels and insulin treatment on clinical outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.