What medications should be avoided in patients with 2nd degree heart block?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Medications to Avoid in Second-Degree Heart Block

Patients with second-degree heart block should avoid or use with extreme caution beta-blockers, non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem), digoxin, Class I antiarrhythmics, and amiodarone, as these agents can worsen AV conduction and precipitate complete heart block. 1

Critical Medications to Avoid

Beta-Blockers

  • Beta-blockers have negative dromotropic effects on the AV node and prolong AV nodal conduction time, making them particularly dangerous in pre-existing AV conduction abnormalities 1
  • Concomitant therapy with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers may result in additive negative effects on heart rate and AV conduction, with reports of excessive bradycardia and complete heart block 2
  • The combination of verapamil and beta-blockers should be used only with extreme caution and close monitoring, as risks may outweigh benefits 2
  • Metoprolol-induced AV block frequently persists or recurs (24 of 36 cases) even after drug discontinuation, whereas carvedilol-induced block typically resolves (21 of 24 cases) 3

Non-Dihydropyridine Calcium Channel Blockers

  • Verapamil and diltiazem are contraindicated as they significantly impair AV nodal conduction 1, 2, 4
  • Verapamil should be administered cautiously to patients with impaired hepatic function, with dose reductions to approximately 30% of normal dosing, and careful monitoring for abnormal PR interval prolongation 2
  • Diltiazem increases exposure to ivabradine and may exacerbate bradycardia and conduction disturbances; concurrent use should be avoided 4
  • The combination of calcium channel blockers with multiple AV nodal blocking agents carries particularly high risk of worsening AV block 1

Digoxin

  • Digoxin should be avoided as it can further slow AV conduction and potentially worsen the block 1
  • Digoxin-induced AV block usually improves (28 of 39 cases) after withdrawal of the drug 3
  • When digoxin is coadministered with verapamil, serum digoxin levels may increase by 50-75% during the first week of therapy, potentially resulting in digitalis toxicity 2
  • Patients with second-degree AV block at high risk of complete heart block (including those with digitalis intoxication) should use quinidine only with extreme caution 5

Antiarrhythmic Agents

  • Class I antiarrhythmic agents (flecainide, propafenone) should be avoided as they may worsen conduction disorders 1
  • Amiodarone should be used with extreme caution due to its potential to cause bradycardia and worsen AV block 1
  • Quinidine should be used only with caution in patients at high risk of complete AV block, including those with second-degree AV block 5
  • Disopyramide should not be administered within 48 hours before or 24 hours after verapamil administration 2
  • Flecainide and verapamil may have additive effects on AV conduction, resulting in additive negative inotropic effect and prolongation of AV conduction 2

Other Medications

  • Ivabradine is contraindicated in patients with second-degree AV block 1
  • Tricyclic antidepressants should be used with caution as they can cause PR and QRS prolongation 1
  • Certain antipsychotic medications (thioridazine, haloperidol) that prolong QT interval should be avoided 1

Clinical Context: Mobitz Type I vs Type II

Mobitz Type I (Wenckebach)

  • Mobitz type I is characterized by progressive PR interval prolongation until a beat is not conducted, with block usually at the AV node level 1
  • It is commonly associated with inferior wall myocardial infarction and usually resolves spontaneously or after reperfusion 1
  • Despite its traditional "benign" reputation, chronic Mobitz type I block has similar prognosis to Mobitz type II block, with five-year survival of only 41% in unpaced patients versus 78% in paced patients 6

Mobitz Type II

  • Mobitz type II block occurs almost always below the AV node (infranodal) and is more likely to progress to complete heart block and Stokes-Adams arrest 7
  • Type II AV block must be distinguished from nonconducted premature atrial contractions and atrial tachycardia with block 7

Management Approach

Drug Discontinuation

  • When medication-induced AV block occurs, the offending agent should be discontinued immediately 1
  • Drug discontinuation leads to resolution of AV block in only 41% of cases initially, but 56% of these patients experience recurrence of AV block even in the absence of therapy 8
  • AV block is commonly "related to drugs" but rarely "caused by drugs" - only 15% of patients with II or III degree AV block during therapy with beta-blockers, verapamil, or diltiazem have truly drug-induced block 8
  • Roughly half of patients with drug-induced AV block ultimately require permanent pacemaker implantation 3

Acute Symptomatic Management

  • If Mobitz type I AV block is symptomatic with hemodynamic compromise, atropine (0.5 mg IV every 3-5 minutes to maximum 2.5 mg) can be considered as first-line treatment 9, 1
  • Atropine doses less than 0.5 mg may paradoxically result in further slowing of heart rate due to central reflex stimulation of the vagus or peripheral parasympathomimetic effects 9
  • Atropine is the drug of choice for type I second-degree AV block, especially when complicating inferior myocardial infarction with symptoms of hypotension, ischemic discomfort, or ventricular arrhythmias 9
  • Atropine is rarely useful for type II second-degree AV block and may increase the sinus rate while actually enhancing the block 9

Pacing Indications

  • Temporary pacing may be indicated for medically refractory symptomatic or hemodynamically significant bradycardia 1
  • Permanent pacing is generally not indicated for Mobitz type I AV block unless it is symptomatic and does not respond to medication discontinuation 1
  • Pacemaker insertion is the treatment of choice for symptomatic bradycardia not responding promptly to atropine administration 9

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not assume that drug discontinuation will permanently resolve AV block - 27% of patients with improved AV conduction after drug withdrawal experience recurrence despite continued absence of the culprit medication 3
  • Do not combine multiple AV nodal blocking agents (e.g., beta-blocker plus calcium channel blocker) as this carries particularly high risk 1
  • Do not use atropine doses less than 0.5 mg as this may paradoxically worsen bradycardia 9, 1
  • Do not assume Mobitz type I block is benign - unpaced patients with chronic Mobitz type I have poor prognosis similar to Mobitz type II, with only 57% five-year survival 6
  • Careful monitoring for abnormal PR interval prolongation is essential when any AV nodal blocking agent must be continued 2

References

Guideline

Medications to Avoid in Mobitz Type I Second-Degree Heart Block

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Management of patients with drug-induced atrioventricular block.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE, 2012

Research

Survival in second degree atrioventricular block.

British heart journal, 1985

Research

Second-degree atrioventricular block: Mobitz type II.

The Journal of emergency medicine, 1993

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.