What are the treatment options for a rectocele?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: December 31, 2025View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Treatment of Rectocele

Conservative management with pelvic floor biofeedback therapy should be the first-line treatment for symptomatic rectocele, with surgical intervention reserved for patients who fail conservative measures and have significant quality of life impairment. 1

Initial Conservative Management

  • Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is the primary conservative treatment to correct underlying pelvic floor dysfunction in patients with rectocele 1
  • Medical management includes fiber supplementation, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation, and suppositories/enemas when biofeedback fails 1, 2
  • Conservative measures are effective in approximately 80% of patients, with only 20% requiring surgical intervention 2
  • Treatment should address the "iceberg syndrome" concept—visible anatomical defects (rectocele) plus underlying functional disorders (anismus, rectal hyposensation, anxiety/depression) that require conservative rather than surgical management 2

Indications for Surgical Intervention

Surgery should be considered only after failure of conservative management and when symptoms significantly impair quality of life 1, 3

Key surgical indications include:

  • Symptomatic rectoceles (typically >3 cm) causing obstructed defecation requiring digital disimpaction maneuvers 3, 4
  • Grade 3-4 rectal prolapse associated with rectocele 1
  • Persistent symptoms of pelvic heaviness, anal incontinence, or dyspareunia despite conservative therapy 3

Surgical Approach Selection Algorithm

The surgical approach should be determined by rectocele location and associated pelvic floor disorders 1, 3:

For Low or Mid Rectocele (Isolated)

  • Transanal approach including Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) is appropriate 1, 3
  • STARR effectively reduces rectocele size from average 3.8 cm to 1.9 cm 1
  • 82% of patients report >50% reduction in obstructed defecation scores at one year 1
  • STARR shows superior symptom improvement compared to posterior colporrhaphy for obstructed defecation syndrome 4

For High Rectocele or Multiple Pelvic Floor Disorders

  • Ventral rectopexy (laparoscopic or open) is the recommended approach 1, 2
  • Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy is an effective surgical option for complex cases 2
  • The choice between open or laparoscopic technique should be based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise 1

Alternative Approaches

  • Transvaginal posterior colporrhaphy can be considered, particularly for larger rectoceles (>5 cm) 4
  • Transperineal approach is an option for isolated low rectoceles 3

Critical Pitfalls and Caveats

The correlation between anatomical correction and symptom improvement is often weak—this is the most important consideration when counseling patients 1:

  • Anatomical abnormalities may be caused by underlying functional disorders that surgery does not correct 1
  • Long-term outcomes of STARR are somewhat disappointing despite initial improvement 1
  • Successful anatomic repair rates are high, but functional outcomes are more variable 5
  • Recurrent rectocele occurs in approximately 17% of patients 2 years after surgery 6

Complications to Monitor

STARR carries rare but serious complications that require careful patient counseling 1:

  • Fistula formation, peritonitis, and bowel perforation (rare but serious) 1
  • More common complications include infection, pain, incontinence, and bleeding 1
  • Post-operative pain is common after rectocele repair 1

Transtar procedure appears safer than STARR when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception 2

Patient Selection Considerations

  • Age, comorbidities, and associated pelvic floor disorders must guide surgical approach selection 1
  • Patients should undergo dynamic imaging (defecography) and anorectal manometry before surgical decision-making 3
  • A multidisciplinary approach involving colorectal and urogynecologic surgeons provides optimal results 2, 6
  • Careful patient selection and realistic counseling about the weak correlation between anatomical correction and symptom relief is essential 1

References

Guideline

Management of Rectocele

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Management of obstructed defecation.

World journal of gastroenterology, 2015

Research

Surgical management of the rectocele - An update.

Journal of visceral surgery, 2021

Research

Rectocele.

Clinics in colon and rectal surgery, 2010

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.