Treatment of Rectocele
Conservative management with pelvic floor biofeedback therapy should be the first-line treatment for symptomatic rectocele, with surgical intervention reserved for patients who fail conservative measures and have significant quality of life impairment. 1
Initial Conservative Management
- Pelvic floor biofeedback therapy is the primary conservative treatment to correct underlying pelvic floor dysfunction in patients with rectocele 1
- Medical management includes fiber supplementation, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation, and suppositories/enemas when biofeedback fails 1, 2
- Conservative measures are effective in approximately 80% of patients, with only 20% requiring surgical intervention 2
- Treatment should address the "iceberg syndrome" concept—visible anatomical defects (rectocele) plus underlying functional disorders (anismus, rectal hyposensation, anxiety/depression) that require conservative rather than surgical management 2
Indications for Surgical Intervention
Surgery should be considered only after failure of conservative management and when symptoms significantly impair quality of life 1, 3
Key surgical indications include:
- Symptomatic rectoceles (typically >3 cm) causing obstructed defecation requiring digital disimpaction maneuvers 3, 4
- Grade 3-4 rectal prolapse associated with rectocele 1
- Persistent symptoms of pelvic heaviness, anal incontinence, or dyspareunia despite conservative therapy 3
Surgical Approach Selection Algorithm
The surgical approach should be determined by rectocele location and associated pelvic floor disorders 1, 3:
For Low or Mid Rectocele (Isolated)
- Transanal approach including Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (STARR) is appropriate 1, 3
- STARR effectively reduces rectocele size from average 3.8 cm to 1.9 cm 1
- 82% of patients report >50% reduction in obstructed defecation scores at one year 1
- STARR shows superior symptom improvement compared to posterior colporrhaphy for obstructed defecation syndrome 4
For High Rectocele or Multiple Pelvic Floor Disorders
- Ventral rectopexy (laparoscopic or open) is the recommended approach 1, 2
- Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy is an effective surgical option for complex cases 2
- The choice between open or laparoscopic technique should be based on patient characteristics and surgeon expertise 1
Alternative Approaches
- Transvaginal posterior colporrhaphy can be considered, particularly for larger rectoceles (>5 cm) 4
- Transperineal approach is an option for isolated low rectoceles 3
Critical Pitfalls and Caveats
The correlation between anatomical correction and symptom improvement is often weak—this is the most important consideration when counseling patients 1:
- Anatomical abnormalities may be caused by underlying functional disorders that surgery does not correct 1
- Long-term outcomes of STARR are somewhat disappointing despite initial improvement 1
- Successful anatomic repair rates are high, but functional outcomes are more variable 5
- Recurrent rectocele occurs in approximately 17% of patients 2 years after surgery 6
Complications to Monitor
STARR carries rare but serious complications that require careful patient counseling 1:
- Fistula formation, peritonitis, and bowel perforation (rare but serious) 1
- More common complications include infection, pain, incontinence, and bleeding 1
- Post-operative pain is common after rectocele repair 1
Transtar procedure appears safer than STARR when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception 2
Patient Selection Considerations
- Age, comorbidities, and associated pelvic floor disorders must guide surgical approach selection 1
- Patients should undergo dynamic imaging (defecography) and anorectal manometry before surgical decision-making 3
- A multidisciplinary approach involving colorectal and urogynecologic surgeons provides optimal results 2, 6
- Careful patient selection and realistic counseling about the weak correlation between anatomical correction and symptom relief is essential 1