What abdominal pathologies can a CT scan with intravenous (IV) contrast detect?

CT Abdomen with IV Contrast: Diagnostic Capabilities in Hospitalized Patients

CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast is the primary imaging modality for evaluating acute abdominal pathology in hospitalized patients, providing comprehensive assessment of inflammatory, infectious, vascular, and neoplastic conditions across all abdominal organs. 1

Inflammatory and Infectious Pathologies

Gastrointestinal Tract:

• Appendicitis is detected with 93-100% sensitivity when IV contrast is used, compared to 91% sensitivity without contrast 2
• Diverticulitis is identified with 81% sensitivity, showing bowel wall thickening, pericolonic fat stranding, and abscess formation 1
• Inflammatory bowel disease (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis) demonstrates mural enhancement associated with active inflammation that requires IV contrast for optimal assessment 1, 3
• Pseudomembranous (C. difficile) colitis shows CT findings in 88% of cases, displaying colonic wall thickening and pericolonic inflammation 1
• Neutropenic enterocolitis is detected in 28% of neutropenic patients with abdominal pain, showing bowel wall thickening and mucosal enhancement 1

Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic:

• Cholecystitis and cholangitis are visualized with gallbladder wall thickening, pericholecystic fluid, and biliary ductal dilatation 1
• Pancreatitis demonstrates pancreatic enlargement, peripancreatic fat stranding, and fluid collections 1
• Liver abscesses appear as hypodense lesions with rim enhancement 1

Genitourinary:

• Pyelonephritis shows focal or multifocal decreased parenchymal enhancement in 62.5% of cases on contrast-enhanced CT versus only 1.4% on unenhanced CT 1
• Renal and perirenal abscesses are detected with 100% sensitivity on contrast-enhanced CT, while unenhanced CT misses 4.6% of cases 1
• Pelvic inflammatory disease detection increases by 280% following CT with contrast 1

Vascular Pathologies

Mesenteric Ischemia:

• Arterial occlusion (embolism, thrombosis, dissection) is identified with 93-100% sensitivity on CT angiography 1
• Mesenteric vein thrombosis appears as filling defects in portal or mesenteric veins 1
• Bowel infarction demonstrates reduced segmental bowel-wall enhancement with 100% specificity, along with pneumatosis intestinalis and portal venous gas 1

Obstructive Pathologies

Small Bowel Obstruction (SBO):

• SBO accounts for 12% of acute abdominal pathology in certain populations, showing dilated bowel loops proximal to transition point 1
• CT identifies the obstruction site, degree, and complications including closed-loop obstruction and bowel ischemia 1

Biliary Obstruction:

• Malignant biliary strictures are identified with 95% sensitivity and 93.35% specificity 1
• CT demonstrates the obstruction level and potential etiologies including stones, strictures, and masses 1

Neoplastic Pathologies

Primary and Metastatic Malignancies:

• Pancreaticobiliary malignancies are diagnosed and staged with high accuracy, including assessment of vascular involvement and resectability 1
• Colorectal cancer is detected with 74% pooled sensitivity on routine CT with IV contrast, though this is suboptimal compared to dedicated CT colonography 1
• Lymphomas and diffuse metastases presenting with abdominal pain are depicted across all abdominal organs and lymph node chains 1
• Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease is evaluated in transplant recipients 1

Abscess and Fluid Collections

Intra-abdominal Abscesses:

• CT demonstrates 88% sensitivity and 93% specificity for abscess detection, superior to ultrasound (75% sensitivity, 91% specificity) 1
• Tubo-ovarian abscesses are detected with 100% sensitivity 1
• CT guidance enables percutaneous drainage, which is feasible and effective for abdominopelvic abscess treatment 1

Sepsis Source Identification:

• Among ICU patients with sepsis of unknown origin, CT reveals the source in 16% of cases (7 of 45 patients) 1

Perforation and Peritonitis

Bowel Perforation:

• Free intraperitoneal air is identified on CT, with distant air >5 cm from pathological bowel loop indicating complicated diverticulitis stage 2B 4
• Diffuse fluid in multiple abdominal quadrants with or without free air indicates advanced peritonitis 4

Critical Advantages of IV Contrast

Enhanced Detection Rates:

• IV contrast administration increases detection of urgent pathology compared to non-contrast CT (p = 0.004) 5
• Urgent findings are better characterized with contrast (p = 0.002), and non-urgent findings are also better delineated (p < 0.001) 5
• Adherence to ACR appropriateness criteria for IV contrast is associated with increased detection of urgent pathology (p = 0.02) 5

Diagnostic Accuracy:

• CT with IV contrast alone correctly diagnoses acute abdominal processes in 92.5% of cases 6
• No significant difference exists between various contrast combinations (IV alone, IV + oral, oral alone) in overall diagnostic accuracy for acute abdominal processes 6

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

Contrast Administration Considerations:

• IV contrast is contraindicated in severe renal impairment (GFR <30) and contrast allergy, though benefits may outweigh risks in suspected acute mesenteric ischemia 1, 3
• Oral contrast delays scan acquisition and departmental throughput without clear diagnostic advantage in most acute settings 1, 3
• The ACR recommends avoiding oral contrast for acute nonlocalized abdominal pain, as IV contrast alone is sufficient 3

Limitations:

• Unenhanced CT has relatively low negative predictive value (64%) for upper abdominal pain, commonly missing pancreaticobiliary inflammatory processes and gastritis/duodenitis 1
• Repeat CT within 72 hours after initially negative CT has low diagnostic yield (dropping from 22% on initial presentation to 5.9% on fourth CT or greater) 1
• CT in patients with concomitant diarrhea changes management in only 11% versus 53% in patients with abdominal pain alone 1