How to improve left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 1, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Improving Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)

For patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF, LVEF ≤40%), initiate the four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT): an ACE inhibitor or ARNI (sacubitril/valsartan), a beta-blocker (bisoprolol, carvedilol, or metoprolol succinate), a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, and an SGLT2 inhibitor—all of which have been proven to improve LVEF, reduce mortality, and decrease hospitalizations. 1, 2

Core Pharmacological Strategy

First-Line Therapy: The Four Pillars

ACE Inhibitors or ARNI:

  • Start an ACE inhibitor (such as enalapril 2.5-5 mg twice daily) and uptitrate to target dose (10-20 mg twice daily) over 2-4 weeks unless contraindicated 1, 2
  • Sacubitril/valsartan (ARNI) is superior to ACE inhibitors alone for improving LVEF and reducing mortality in HFrEF patients 1, 3
  • In the PRIME trial, ARNI produced significantly larger reductions in mitral regurgitation and better LV reverse remodeling compared to valsartan alone 1
  • Starting dose for sacubitril/valsartan is 49/51 mg twice daily, with uptitration to target dose of 97/103 mg twice daily after 2-4 weeks 3
  • Critical: Allow a 36-hour washout period when switching from an ACE inhibitor to sacubitril/valsartan to avoid angioedema 3

Beta-Blockers:

  • Use one of the three proven beta-blockers: bisoprolol, carvedilol, or sustained-release metoprolol succinate 1, 2
  • These agents improve LVEF by an average of 5.7-7.4 ejection fraction units across multiple studies 4
  • Titrate to at least 50% of maximum guideline-recommended dose to achieve optimal medical therapy score 1
  • Beta-blockers reduce mortality and hospitalization when added to ACE inhibitors 2

Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists:

  • Add spironolactone 12.5-25 mg once daily (maximum 50 mg) or eplerenone in patients with symptomatic HFrEF 1, 2
  • Monitor serum creatinine (should be ≤2.5 mg/dL in men, ≤2.0 mg/dL in women) and potassium (should be <5.0 mEq/L) closely 5

SGLT2 Inhibitors:

  • Provide mortality benefit in both HFrEF and HFpEF 2
  • Improve adverse LV remodeling and should be initiated in all eligible patients 1

Optimal Medical Therapy Scoring

To achieve "optimal" therapy status (score ≥5), patients must receive: 1

  • A heart failure-specific beta-blocker at ≥50% maximum dose (2 points)
  • An ACE inhibitor, ARB, or ARNI at ≥50% maximum dose (2 points) OR sacubitril/valsartan at any dose (2 points)
  • A mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist at any dose (1 point)

Device Therapy for LVEF Improvement

Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT):

  • Indicated for patients with LVEF ≤35%, NYHA Class II-IV symptoms on optimal medical therapy, and QRS ≥150 ms with left bundle branch block morphology 2
  • CRT improves LVEF even in patients with very low baseline ejection fraction (5-15%) 6
  • Response rate to CRT is approximately 71% overall, with similar response rates across all baseline LVEF subgroups 6
  • There is no lower limit for baseline LVEF to predict non-response to CRT in eligible patients 6

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD):

  • Recommended for primary prevention in patients with LVEF ≤30-35%, NYHA Class II-III symptoms on optimal medical therapy for ≥3 months, and life expectancy >1 year 2
  • Also indicated for secondary prevention in patients with history of cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, or hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia 1, 2

Management of Specific Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation with HFrEF:

  • Catheter ablation for AF in HFrEF patients significantly improves LVEF (average increase of 8-18% depending on baseline characteristics) 1
  • In the CASTLE-AF trial, 63% of ablation patients maintained sinus rhythm at 5 years versus 22% in the medical therapy group 1
  • AF ablation led to significant improvements in LVEF (+8% vs. 0%), all-cause mortality (13% vs. 25%), and HF hospitalization (21% vs. 36%) 1
  • Patients without late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac MRI have the best LVEF improvement after ablation 1

Rapid Supraventricular Arrhythmias:

  • Pay particular attention to patients with cardiomyopathy associated with rapid atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation, as these rhythm disorders may lead to or exacerbate ventricular dysfunction 1
  • Rate control to <80 beats/min is recommended 1

Critical Medications to Avoid

The following drugs adversely affect clinical status and should be avoided or withdrawn: 1, 7

  • NSAIDs (cause sodium and water retention, counteract diuretic effects, can precipitate acute decompensation even with single-dose exposure)
  • Most antiarrhythmic drugs
  • Calcium channel blockers with negative inotropic effects (especially in patients with EF <40% post-MI)

Adjunctive Therapies

Diuretics:

  • Use loop diuretics (furosemide 20-40 mg once or twice daily, bumetanide 0.5-1.0 mg once or twice, or torsemide 10-20 mg once daily) for patients with current or prior symptoms and evidence of fluid retention 1, 2
  • Combine with salt restriction to <2-3 g/day 2

Exercise Training:

  • Beneficial as an adjunctive approach to improve clinical status in ambulatory patients with current or prior symptoms of HFrEF 1, 2
  • Improves functional capacity and quality of life 2

Monitoring Parameters

Essential monitoring includes: 7, 2

  • Renal function (creatinine, GFR) and electrolytes (potassium) at baseline, 1-2 weeks after dose changes, and every 3-6 months
  • Signs of fluid retention: weight gain, peripheral edema, worsening dyspnea, or orthopnea
  • Symptoms and functional capacity regularly to guide diuretic dosing
  • Natriuretic peptides (BNP or NT-proBNP) at baseline and serially to guide therapy and assess prognosis 2

Expected Outcomes and LVEF Recovery

Patients who improve their LVEF from ≤40% to >40% are classified as having "heart failure with improved ejection fraction" (HFimpEF): 1

  • These patients should continue HFrEF treatment, as EF can decrease after withdrawal of pharmacological therapy 1
  • Nearly 60% of patients with HFrEF may have significant improvement in MR and LVEF after treatment with GDMT 1
  • Improvement in LVEF does not mean full myocardial recovery; cardiac structural abnormalities often persist 1

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not discontinue GDMT in patients whose LVEF improves to >40%, as many will experience a decrease in EF after medication withdrawal 1
  • Do not use adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) in CHF patients with LVEF ≤45%, as it increases cardiac death risk (relative risk 1.25) 1
  • Do not undertitrate medications—aim for at least 50% of maximum guideline-recommended doses to achieve optimal therapy 1
  • Do not delay device therapy in eligible patients while waiting for maximal medical therapy response 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Comprehensive Management of Congestive Heart Failure

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

What is the lowest value of left ventricular baseline ejection fraction that predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy?

Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2014

Guideline

Treatment Approach for Grade 1 Diastolic Dysfunction with Moderate Concentric LVH

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.