Does ceftriaxone (a cephalosporin antibiotic) cover Enterococcus (a type of bacteria)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 2, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Does Ceftriaxone Cover Enterococcus?

No, ceftriaxone does not provide adequate coverage for Enterococcus species when used as monotherapy and should not be relied upon for treating enterococcal infections. 1, 2

Intrinsic Resistance Pattern

  • Enterococci, including E. faecalis and E. faecium, are intrinsically resistant to all cephalosporins, including ceftriaxone, when used alone. 1, 2
  • This resistance applies to both third-generation cephalosporins like ceftriaxone and other cephalosporin classes. 1
  • Using ceftriaxone monotherapy for enterococcal infections will likely result in treatment failure and potentially worsen patient outcomes. 2

Clinical Context Where This Matters

The lack of enterococcal coverage by ceftriaxone is particularly important in:

  • Intra-abdominal infections: Guidelines acknowledge that cephalosporin-based regimens have limited Enterococcus coverage, though the clinical significance of empirically covering enterococci in peripartum infections remains debated. 1
  • Urinary tract infections: Assuming all gram-positive cocci will respond to cephalosporins is a critical clinical pitfall, as enterococci are a notable exception. 2
  • Endocarditis: Ceftriaxone alone is explicitly not recommended for enterococcal endocarditis. 1

The Exception: Combination Therapy

The combination of ampicillin PLUS ceftriaxone demonstrates synergistic activity against E. faecalis (but not reliably against E. faecium) in serious infections like endocarditis. 1, 3, 4

  • This synergy likely occurs through saturation of different penicillin-binding proteins. 1
  • The American Heart Association recommends ampicillin-ceftriaxone as an alternative to ampicillin-gentamicin for E. faecalis endocarditis, particularly when aminoglycoside use is contraindicated due to nephrotoxicity or high-level aminoglycoside resistance. 1
  • This combination showed synergy in 100% of E. faecalis isolates in time-kill studies but only 33% of E. faecium isolates, making it unreliable for E. faecium. 3

However, this combination is primarily recommended for endocarditis, NOT for urinary tract infections or other common enterococcal infections. 2

Appropriate Treatment for Enterococcal Infections

When enterococci are identified or suspected:

  • For E. faecalis UTI requiring IV therapy: Use IV ampicillin or ampicillin-sulbactam as first choice; IV vancomycin for beta-lactam allergic patients. 2
  • For enterococcal endocarditis: Ampicillin or penicillin G plus gentamicin (for relatively resistant strains including enterococci) for the full course. 1
  • For intra-abdominal infections: If using ceftriaxone-metronidazole, ampicillin should be added to provide enterococcal coverage when clinically indicated. 1

Critical Clinical Pitfall

Never continue ceftriaxone monotherapy after culture results identify Enterococcus as the causative pathogen. 2 Switch to appropriate anti-enterococcal therapy immediately to prevent treatment failure.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Ceftriaxone Inappropriateness for Enterococcus faecalis UTI

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

A Review of Combination Antimicrobial Therapy for Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream Infections and Infective Endocarditis.

Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2018

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.