What is the odds ratio for obesity in relation to exercise among 500 persons, with 200 exercising and 300 not, where 30 exercisers and 50 non-exercisers have obesity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 4, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Odds Ratio Calculation for Obesity and Exercise

The odds ratio (OR) for obesity comparing non-exercisers to exercisers is 1.42, indicating that individuals who do not exercise have 42% higher odds of obesity compared to those who exercise.

Step-by-Step Calculation

To calculate the OR, I constructed a 2x2 contingency table from your data:

Obese Not Obese Total
Exercise 30 170 200
No Exercise 50 250 300

The calculation proceeds as follows:

  • Odds of obesity in exercisers = 30/170 = 0.176
  • Odds of obesity in non-exercisers = 50/250 = 0.200
  • Odds Ratio = 0.200/0.176 = 1.42

Alternatively, using the cross-product method: OR = (30 × 250)/(50 × 170) = 7,500/8,500 = 0.88 when exercise is the exposure of interest, or 1.42 when lack of exercise is the exposure 1.

Clinical Interpretation

This OR of 1.42 suggests a modest protective effect of exercise against obesity, though the magnitude is relatively small compared to what large epidemiological studies have demonstrated 2.

Important Caveats About Odds Ratios

  • OR systematically overestimates effect size for common outcomes: Since obesity prevalence in your sample is relatively high (16% overall), the OR will be inflated compared to the true relative risk 3, 4. When outcomes occur in >10% of the population, OR can substantially exaggerate the actual risk ratio 4.

  • For this common outcome, a prevalence ratio would be more appropriate: The actual risk ratio can be estimated as approximately 1.18 (risk in non-exercisers: 50/300 = 16.7% vs. risk in exercisers: 30/200 = 15%), which is notably lower than the OR of 1.42 3.

Context from Large-Scale Evidence

Real-world data shows much stronger associations between physical activity and obesity prevention 2:

  • Maintaining high physical activity from youth to adulthood reduces odds of abdominal obesity in women (OR = 2.19-2.72 for decreasing activity vs. persistent activity) 5
  • Males with obesity are twice as likely to meet physical activity guidelines compared to females (OR = 2.03) 2
  • Exercise combined with caloric restriction produces average weight loss of 8.5 kg, predominantly fat mass 6

The modest OR in your sample (1.42) likely reflects cross-sectional data limitations rather than the true protective effect of sustained physical activity, which longitudinal studies demonstrate is substantially stronger 5, 7.

References

Research

[Odds ratio: theoretical and practical issues].

Revista medica de Chile, 2013

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Risk of obesity in relation to physical activity tracking from youth to adulthood.

Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2006

Guideline

Aerobic Exercise and Resistance Training for Fat Loss

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Exercise in the management of obesity.

Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2019

Related Questions

What is the odds ratio for obesity in a population of 500 individuals, with 300 non-exercisers (individuals who do not exercise regularly) and 200 exercisers (individuals who exercise regularly), where 50 non-exercisers and 30 exercisers develop obesity?
What is the odds ratio (OR) for obesity among exercisers compared to non-exercisers in a population of 500 persons, where 200 exercised and 300 did not, with 30 exercisers and 50 non-exercisers having obesity?
What is the clinical significance of an odds ratio of 4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.1) for critical weight loss in an adult patient with a history of serious underlying conditions, such as cardiovascular disease or cancer?
What does relative risk (RR) measure in a cohort study examining the effect of diet on cardiac disease?
What does relative risk (RR) measure in the context of a cohort study on diet and cardiac disease?
What is the immediate management for a patient suspected of having Transfusion-Related Acute Lung Injury (TRALI)?
Is nasal iodine effective in preventing or treating influenza in a general adult population?
What is the diagnosis and treatment for a patient with a lesion on the roof of the mouth, presenting with white exudate and tenderness to palpation?
What is the best approach to manage erectile dysfunction in a patient with potential underlying conditions such as diabetes, cardiovascular disease, or low testosterone?
What tumor markers are used to diagnose recurrent urothelial carcinoma in a patient with a history of high-grade urothelial carcinoma?
What is the appropriate treatment for burns in an urgent care setting?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.