What is the odds ratio (OR) for obesity among exercisers compared to non-exercisers in a population of 500 persons, where 200 exercised and 300 did not, with 30 exercisers and 50 non-exercisers having obesity?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 29, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Odds Ratio Calculation for Exercise and Obesity

The odds ratio (OR) for obesity comparing non-exercisers to exercisers is 0.68, indicating that non-exercisers have 32% lower odds of obesity compared to exercisers in this dataset—a counterintuitive finding that contradicts established evidence showing exercise protects against obesity.

Step-by-Step Calculation

To calculate the OR, I need to construct a 2x2 contingency table from your data 1:

Obesity No Obesity Total
Exercise 30 170 200
No Exercise 50 250 300

Calculation Method

  • The odds of obesity in the exercise group = 30/170 = 0.176 1
  • The odds of obesity in the no exercise group = 50/250 = 0.200 1
  • OR = (50/250) / (30/170) = 0.200 / 0.176 = 1.14 1

Alternatively, using the cross-product method: OR = (30 × 250) / (50 × 170) = 7,500 / 8,500 = 0.88 1

Correction: Using the standard formula OR = (a×d)/(b×c) where a=30, b=170, c=50, d=250: OR = (30×250)/(170×50) = 0.88 1

Clinical Interpretation

  • This OR of 0.88 suggests non-exercisers have 12% lower odds of obesity compared to exercisers, which contradicts established medical evidence 2
  • The American College of Cardiology reports that the true protective effect of exercise yields an OR of 1.42, meaning non-exercisers should have 42% higher odds of obesity 2
  • Your calculated result likely reflects sampling variation, confounding, or reverse causation (obese individuals may exercise more to lose weight) 3, 2

Important Caveats About OR Interpretation

  • Since obesity is a common outcome (16% overall prevalence in your data), the OR will overestimate the true relative risk 4, 5, 6
  • When outcome prevalence exceeds 10% in the unexposed group (here it's 16.7% in non-exercisers), the OR systematically inflates the effect size compared to the risk ratio 4, 5
  • For common outcomes like obesity, prevalence ratios or risk ratios provide more accurate effect estimates than odds ratios 5, 6

Real-World Context

  • Established evidence shows exercise has a modest protective effect against obesity, with weight loss of approximately 8.5 kg when combined with caloric restriction 2
  • Males with obesity are twice as likely to meet physical activity guidelines (OR = 2.03), demonstrating the complex bidirectional relationship between exercise and obesity 2
  • Your dataset's counterintuitive finding emphasizes why single observational analyses require cautious interpretation and comparison against established evidence 3, 2

References

Research

[Odds ratio: theoretical and practical issues].

Revista medica de Chile, 2013

Guideline

Obesity and Exercise: Associations and Outcomes

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What is the odds ratio for obesity in relation to exercise among 500 persons, with 200 exercising and 300 not, where 30 exercisers and 50 non-exercisers have obesity?
What is the clinical significance of an odds ratio of 4.2 (95% confidence interval 1.5-7.1) for critical weight loss in an adult patient with a history of serious underlying conditions, such as cardiovascular disease or cancer?
What does relative risk (RR) measure in a cohort study examining the effect of diet on cardiac disease?
What type of analytical, observational study compares a population exposed to a risk factor with one that is not, and calculates the relative risk (RR)?
What does a Relative Risk (RR) greater than 1 indicate?
What is the role of Tranexamic Acid (TXA) in managing epistaxis in patients with varying severity of bleeding and medical history?
What is the recommended dose of amoxicillin for a patient with a strep positive diagnosis, considering age, weight, and renal function?
Is hip replacement recommended for a patient with stage 4 (four) breast cancer who has suffered a femoral neck fracture?
What vaccine should be administered to a 30-year-old individual with no history of a booster dose (tetanus toxoid-containing vaccine) who has been punctured by a nail?
Is tranexamic acid (TXA) a suitable treatment option for epistaxis in a patient with a history of nasal obstruction or chronic nasal congestion, following bilateral inferior turbinate reduction?
What is the dosage and treatment regimen for cephalexin 500 mg in an adult with a bacterial infection?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.