How should an electrocardiogram (ECG) be interpreted and what are the subsequent management steps for a patient with a potential acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or other cardiovascular conditions?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 5, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

ECG Interpretation in the Emergency Setting

Immediate Acquisition and Initial Assessment

Obtain a 12-lead ECG within minutes of first medical contact for any patient with suspected acute coronary syndrome, and interpret it immediately to guide triage and treatment decisions. 1, 2

Timing and Technical Requirements

  • Acquire the ECG as soon as possible after patient contact, particularly for chest pain, syncope, or symptoms suggesting myocardial infarction 2
  • Verify proper electrode placement and adequate filtering settings (minimum 150 Hz high-frequency response for adults) before interpretation, as misplaced leads can cause false diagnoses 2
  • Repeat the ECG on arrival if obtained prehospitally, as serial recordings improve diagnostic accuracy 2
  • If the initial ECG is equivocal or non-diagnostic, repeat recordings every 15-30 minutes or continuously monitor for dynamic ST-segment changes 1

Systematic Interpretation Framework

Step 1: Rate and Rhythm Analysis

  • Calculate heart rate by counting QRS complexes in a 6-second strip and multiplying by 10, or use 300 divided by the number of large boxes between R waves 2, 3
  • Normal sinus rhythm: 60-100 bpm with P wave before each QRS and consistent PR interval 2
  • Bradycardia <60 bpm; tachycardia >100 bpm 2
  • Assess rhythm regularity by examining R-R intervals for consistency 3

Step 2: Interval Measurements

  • PR interval: Normal 120-200 ms (3-5 small squares); prolongation suggests AV conduction delay 2, 3
  • QRS duration: Normal <120 ms (<3 small squares); widening indicates ventricular conduction abnormality or bundle branch block 2, 3
  • QT interval: Calculate corrected QT (QTc) using Bazett's formula; normal <450 ms for men, <460 ms for women 2, 3

Step 3: Axis Determination

  • Use leads I and aVF for rapid quadrant assessment 2, 3
  • Normal axis: both leads positive (+90° to -30°) 2
  • Left axis deviation: lead I positive, aVF negative (-30° to -90°) 2, 3
  • Right axis deviation: lead I negative, aVF positive (+90° to +180°) 2

Step 4: Critical Pattern Recognition for Acute MI

ST-segment elevation meeting STEMI criteria mandates immediate reperfusion therapy without waiting for biomarker results. 1

STEMI Diagnostic Criteria

  • ST-elevation at J-point in at least two contiguous leads: 1
    • ≥2.5 mm in men <40 years in V2-V3
    • ≥2.0 mm in men ≥40 years in V2-V3
    • ≥1.5 mm in women in V2-V3
    • ≥1.0 mm in all other leads
  • These criteria apply only in the absence of left ventricular hypertrophy or left bundle branch block 1

Territory-Specific ECG Findings

  • Inferior MI: Record right precordial leads (V3R, V4R) to identify concomitant right ventricular infarction 1
  • Posterior MI: ST-depression in V1-V3 with positive terminal T-wave (ST-elevation equivalent); confirm with ST-elevation ≥0.5 mm in V7-V9 1
  • Circumflex occlusion: May present without ST-elevation; extend to V7-V9 leads if suspicion remains high despite non-diagnostic standard ECG 1

Additional Acute Ischemia Patterns

  • Look for hyperacute T-waves, which may precede ST-elevation in very early presentation 1
  • Pathological Q waves (>0.04 seconds or >25% of R wave amplitude) suggest prior or evolving infarction 2
  • Dynamic T-wave changes including inversion, hyperacute morphology, or flattening 2

Step 5: Special Circumstances

Left Bundle Branch Block (LBBB)

  • LBBB obscures standard ST-segment analysis 1
  • Apply modified Sgarbossa criteria to identify acute MI in the presence of LBBB 4
  • In hemodynamically stable patients with LBBB and chest pain, integrate high-sensitivity troponin results before deciding on immediate angiography 1
  • Critical pitfall: More than 50% of patients with chest pain and LBBB will have a non-MI diagnosis 1

Ventricular Pacing

  • Pacemaker rhythm prevents interpretation of ST-segment changes and may require urgent angiography if clinical suspicion is high 1
  • Consider reprogramming the pacemaker to allow evaluation during intrinsic rhythm in non-pacemaker-dependent patients, but do not delay invasive investigation 1

Right Bundle Branch Block (RBBB)

  • ST-elevation remains indicative of STEMI 1
  • ST-depression in leads I, aVL, and V5-V6 indicates NSTE-ACS 1

Integration with Clinical Context

Never interpret the ECG in isolation—clinical presentation, ECG findings, and cardiac biomarkers must be integrated for accurate diagnosis and triage. 2

  • Clinical signs and symptoms alone have insufficient sensitivity (35-38%) and specificity (28-91%) to rule in or rule out ACS 2
  • The ECG has 76% sensitivity and 88% specificity for acute cardiac ischemia, with 68% sensitivity and 97% specificity for acute MI 2
  • A skilled physician must provide differential diagnosis and compare with previous tracings, as the same ECG pattern may occur in different pathophysiologic states 2, 3

When Clinical Suspicion Remains High Despite Non-Diagnostic ECG

  • Suspicion of ongoing myocardial ischemia is an indication for primary PCI strategy even without diagnostic ST-elevation 1
  • Serial ECG monitoring and repeat troponin measurements are mandatory 1
  • Consider extending to V7-V9 leads for posterior involvement 1
  • Echocardiography can identify regional wall motion abnormalities occurring within seconds of coronary occlusion 1

Computer-Assisted Interpretation

  • Computer interpretations must always be verified by a qualified physician—they are adjuncts, not substitutes 2, 3
  • Computer programs accurately calculate heart rate, intervals, and axes, but interpretations of rhythm disturbances, ischemia, or infarction require physician over-reading 2
  • Critical pitfall: Erroneous computer interpretations affect clinical decision-making even when physicians correctly interpret the ECG, leading to inappropriate management 5
  • Field-transmitted ECG for expert interpretation is reasonable if on-site interpretation is unavailable 1, 2

Nonphysician Interpretation in Emergency Settings

  • Paramedics and nurses can independently identify STEMI with mandatory initial training and ongoing concurrent medical oversight of all interpretations 1, 2
  • This allows earlier catheterization lab activation and reduced door-to-balloon times 2

Subsequent Management Based on ECG Findings

STEMI (ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction)

Initiate reperfusion therapy immediately—do not wait for biomarker results. 1

  • Activate the cardiac catheterization laboratory immediately upon STEMI diagnosis 1
  • Begin ECG monitoring to detect life-threatening arrhythmias and allow prompt defibrillation 1
  • Administer aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor unless contraindicated 1
  • Provide pain relief with titrated intravenous opioids (morphine 4-8 mg with additional 2 mg doses every 5 minutes until pain relieved) 1
  • Administer oxygen only if dyspnea, hypoxemia (monitor with pulse oximetry), or signs of heart failure or shock are present 1
  • Avoid empirical high-flow oxygen in uncomplicated AMI without hypoxemia 1

NSTE-ACS (Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome)

  • Measurement of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin is mandatory in all patients with suspected NSTE-ACS 1
  • Dynamic elevation of cardiac troponin above the 99th percentile with compatible clinical presentation indicates MI 1
  • For patients presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset with initially negative troponin, remeasure between 6-12 hours after symptom onset 1
  • Risk stratify for timing of invasive approach based on troponin levels, ECG changes, and clinical features 1
  • Serial ECGs are warranted until the condition stabilizes 1

Non-Diagnostic or Equivocal ECG

  • Repeat ECG recordings and compare with previous records when available 1
  • Continue serial cardiac biomarker testing 1
  • Consider noninvasive imaging (CT angiography, cardiac MRI, myocardial perfusion imaging, or echocardiography) in hemodynamically stable patients with negative biomarkers 1
  • Proceed to stress testing if history, ECG, and serum markers are not diagnostic of acute infarction 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on computer interpretation without physician verification—errors remain common and affect clinical decisions 2, 5
  • Do not fail to compare with previous ECGs when available—this can miss important dynamic changes 2
  • Do not interpret findings without clinical context—this leads to inappropriate management and adverse outcomes 2
  • Do not wait for biomarker results to initiate reperfusion therapy in STEMI—time is myocardium 1
  • Do not assume LBBB or ventricular pacing rules out acute MI—use modified criteria and maintain high clinical suspicion 1, 4
  • Do not dismiss patients with high clinical suspicion despite non-diagnostic ECG—occluded circumflex, vein graft occlusion, or left main disease may not show ST-elevation 1
  • Do not administer empirical high-flow oxygen to all MI patients—reserve for those with hypoxemia, dyspnea, heart failure, or shock 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Approach to Emergency Room ECG Interpretation

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

ECG Interpretation Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The effect of erroneous computer interpretation of ECGs on resident decision making.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 2009

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.