Evaluation and Management of Persistent Pain After Trochanteric Nailing
Obtain immediate radiographs to assess for hardware complications (cut-out, malposition, or fracture nonunion), as these are the most common causes of persistent pain at 5 months and may require conversion to total hip arthroplasty. 1
Initial Diagnostic Workup
Imaging Assessment:
Order AP and lateral hip radiographs to evaluate for:
Consider advanced imaging if radiographs are inconclusive:
Clinical Examination:
- Assess for point tenderness over the greater trochanter (suggests hardware irritation or greater trochanteric pain syndrome) 2
- Evaluate gait pattern and weight-bearing tolerance 3
- Pain with weight-bearing suggests hardware failure or nonunion 1
- Test hip range of motion and strength, particularly abductor function 2
Management Based on Findings
If Hardware Complications Identified:
Lag Screw Cut-Out (Most Common):
- Convert to total hip arthroplasty - this is the definitive treatment for cut-out with 16 of 19 patients requiring this conversion 1
- Be aware that conversion surgery has higher complication rates than primary arthroplasty:
Fracture Nonunion:
- Convert to total hip arthroplasty if nonunion is established (5 patients required this in one series) 1
- Alternative: Re-osteosynthesis with long cephalomedullary nail if bone stock adequate 1
Distal Femoral Fracture at Bolt Site:
- Requires plate osteosynthesis or conversion to long cephalomedullary nail 1
If No Hardware Complications:
Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome:
This is a common cause of lateral hip pain that can occur after hardware placement 2
Initial conservative management:
- Physical therapy focusing on hip abductor strengthening 2
- Regular acetaminophen (paracetamol) every 6 hours 3
- Avoid NSAIDs in elderly patients due to acute kidney injury and gastrointestinal complications; if used, co-prescribe proton pump inhibitor 4
- Corticosteroid injection into trochanteric bursa (provides 2.7-fold chance of recovery) 5
Opioid use should be cautious:
Hardware Irritation Without Failure:
- Trochanteric pain necessitating hardware removal occurred in 30 patients in one series 1
- Critical warning: 4 patients sustained femoral neck fractures after nail removal, so removal should be performed cautiously and only when absolutely necessary 1
- Consider removal only after fracture is fully healed (typically >12 months) 1
Osteoporosis Evaluation and Treatment
Mandatory Assessment:
- Every patient over 50 with a fragility fracture requires systematic evaluation for subsequent fracture risk 4
- Order outpatient DEXA scan 3
- Refer to bone health clinic or endocrinology for osteoporosis management 3
Pharmacologic Treatment:
- Initiate bisphosphonates or denosumab as first-line therapy to prevent subsequent fractures 6
- Ensure adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation 4
- Denosumab should never be interrupted without switching to another therapy, as rapid bone loss occurs 6
Red Flags Requiring Urgent Intervention
- Progressive pain with weight-bearing suggests impending hardware failure 1
- New onset of groin pain may indicate lag screw cut-out 1
- Inability to bear weight suggests nonunion or hardware failure 1
Prognosis
- Trochanteric pain can be chronic: 36% of patients still have symptoms at 1 year, and 29% at 5 years 5
- Patients with osteoarthritis in lower limbs have 4.8-fold risk of persistent symptoms 5
- Most complications after cephalomedullary nailing can be prevented with proper surgical technique, but some are inevitable and require conversion surgery 1