What is the diagnosis and treatment approach for a patient with suspected acute intermittent porphyria (AIP)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Acute Intermittent Porphyria: Comprehensive Overview

Definition and Pathophysiology

Acute intermittent porphyria (AIP) is an autosomal dominant inherited disorder caused by approximately 50% deficiency of hydroxymethylbilane synthase (HMBS), the third enzyme in heme biosynthesis, leading to toxic accumulation of porphyrin precursors δ-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) and porphobilinogen (PBG) that cause acute neurovisceral symptoms. 1

  • The enzyme deficiency predisposes patients to triggering factors (certain drugs, stress, fasting, alcohol, smoking, hormones) that increase hepatic heme demand, inducing ALAS1 (the rate-limiting enzyme) and causing marked accumulation of ALA and PBG 1
  • The genetic prevalence is much higher than previously recognized: pathogenic variants occur in 1 in 1,300 to 1 in 1,785 individuals, though symptomatic disease affects only approximately 1 in 100,000 1
  • Clinical penetrance is extremely low—over 90% of mutation carriers remain asymptomatic for life 1

Clinical Presentation

Demographics and Attack Patterns

  • Approximately 90% of symptomatic patients are women, with attacks rare before menarche or after menopause 1
  • Among symptomatic patients, more than 90% experience only 1 or a few acute attacks in their lifetime 1
  • An estimated 3-5% develop recurrent attacks (defined as 4 or more per year), often triggered by progesterone during the luteal phase 1

Acute Attack Symptoms

The key clinical triad indicating possible AIP includes: (1) severe abdominal pain without peritoneal signs, (2) acute peripheral neuropathy, and (3) encephalopathy with seizures or psychosis. 2

  • Abdominal symptoms: Severe paroxysmal abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, constipation 1
  • Autonomic dysfunction: Tachycardia, hypertension 1, 2
  • Neurological manifestations: Motor and/or sensory polyneuropathy, muscle weakness, cranial nerve abnormalities 1, 2
  • Psychiatric symptoms: Mental status changes, psychosis 2, 3
  • Metabolic abnormalities: Hyponatremia 2, 4

Chronic Manifestations

  • Over 50% of patients with recurrent attacks report chronic neurologic symptoms, and 35% have diagnosed neuropathy 1
  • These patients experience markedly impaired quality of life and elevated risk for long-term complications 1

Diagnosis

When to Screen

Women aged 15-50 years with unexplained, recurrent severe abdominal pain without clear etiology after initial workup should be screened for AHP. 1

  • Diagnosis is frequently delayed by an average of 15 years from symptom onset to diagnosis in the United States and Europe 1
  • AIP should be considered in any patient (especially women of reproductive age) with the characteristic symptom triad 1, 2

Biochemical Testing

Initial diagnosis requires measurement of urinary PBG and ALA in a random urine sample corrected for creatinine. 1

  • During an acute attack: PBG/creatinine ratio is typically increased more than 10 times the upper limit of normal 1
  • Diagnostic threshold: More than fivefold elevation of urinary PBG with typical acute attack symptoms is sufficient to initiate treatment 2
  • The PBG/ALA ratio in urine is approximately 2:1 in AIP patients with normal renal function 1
  • If urinary PBG is normal during current symptoms, acute porphyria is excluded as the cause (assuming proper sample handling) 1

Common pitfall: Screening tests to detect PBG in urine have low specificity and sensitivity and are generally not recommended; if used in emergency settings, results must be confirmed by quantitative assay 1

Genetic Testing

  • Following biochemical confirmation, genetic testing should determine the specific AHP type and identify the pathogenic HMBS variant 1
  • Mutation screening should be offered to family members of confirmed cases 2

Differential Diagnosis

  • ALAD deficiency porphyria (extremely rare, autosomal recessive) presents with elevated ALA but normal or near-normal PBG 5
  • Lead poisoning and hereditary tyrosinemia should be excluded when elevated ALA is found 5

Patient Classification and Management Intensity

Patients should be classified into four subgroups that determine management intensity: 1

  1. Latent genetic carriers: Asymptomatic with normal ALA and PBG levels
  2. Asymptomatic high excretors (ASHE): No acute attacks but biochemically active (urinary ALA and PBG ≥4 times upper limit of normal), representing about 10% of AHP patients 1
  3. Sporadic attack patients: Infrequent acute attacks (<4 per year), representing the majority of symptomatic patients 1
  4. Recurrent attack patients: ≥4 attacks per year, representing 3-5% of symptomatic patients 1

Treatment of Acute Attacks

Immediate Management

The cornerstone of acute attack treatment is suppression of ALA and PBG production through: 3

  1. Discontinuation of all porphyrinogenic drugs and precipitating factors 1, 2
  2. Intravenous hemin administration (most effective treatment) 6, 2, 7
  3. Adequate caloric support 2, 3
  4. Symptomatic treatment 2

Hemin Therapy

Hemin (Panhematin) should be administered at 3-4 mg/kg/day intravenously for severe or moderate acute attacks. 6

  • Hemin inhibits δ-aminolevulinic acid synthetase, limiting porphyrin/heme biosynthesis 6
  • In clinical studies of 99 patients with acute porphyrias, hemin produced clinical response in 85.5% (141/165) of treatment courses, defined by symptom improvement and pain reduction 6
  • All patients demonstrated chemical response with normalization of urinary ALA and PBG 6
  • Clinical response is often rapid after hemin infusion 6
  • Hemin therapy is not curative; symptoms generally return after discontinuation, though some patients experience prolonged remission 6

Important caveat: If sampling occurs during or shortly after hemin treatment, PBG excretion may be lower or normalized 1

Alternative Acute Treatment

  • Carbohydrate loading (intravenous dextrose) should be used when hemin is unavailable or for mild attacks 5, 7
  • High carbohydrate intake (300 g minimum for 72 hours) was used in clinical studies before hemin administration 6

Symptomatic Management

  • Analgesics for severe abdominal pain 5
  • Antiemetics for nausea and vomiting 5
  • Treatment of autonomic dysfunction (tachycardia, hypertension) 2
  • Management of peripheral neuropathy 2
  • Treatment of encephalopathy and seizures 2
  • Correction of hyponatremia 2

Prevention and Long-Term Management

For All Patients

  • Education about avoiding precipitating factors (porphyrinogenic drugs, fasting, alcohol, smoking) 1, 2
  • Access to online drug safety lists for porphyria 2
  • Adequate nutrition and avoidance of fasting 2

For Recurrent Attack Patients (≥4 attacks/year)

Prophylactic treatment with intravenous hemin or subcutaneous givosiran should be considered for patients with 4 or more acute attacks per year. 8

  • Lifestyle evaluation to identify and eliminate triggers 2
  • Hormonal therapy evaluation in women (attacks often correlate with luteal phase) 2, 1
  • Prophylactic heme therapy for prevention 2, 7
  • Liver transplantation should be considered for patients with severe recurrent attacks refractory to other treatments 2, 7

Emerging Therapies

  • Givosiran (siRNA therapy) down-regulates ALAS1 and represents a novel molecular approach 7
  • Enzyme replacement therapy and liver gene therapy are under investigation 3

Long-Term Monitoring and Complications

All AIP patients require regular monitoring for chronic complications: 5

Monitoring Parameters

  • Liver enzymes for hepatic function 5
  • Creatinine and eGFR for renal function 5
  • Blood pressure monitoring 5
  • Neurological assessment for symptoms of neuropathy 5
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening in appropriate cases 5

Long-Term Complications

Patients with recurrent attacks face elevated risk for: 1, 5, 2

  • Hepatocellular carcinoma 1, 2
  • Chronic kidney disease and renal failure 1, 5, 2
  • Chronic hypertension 1, 2
  • Permanent peripheral neuropathy 1, 2
  • Chronic pain syndrome 2

Asymptomatic High Excretors

  • Individuals with elevated ALA and PBG who have never experienced acute attacks may be at increased risk for induced acute attacks, chronic renal or hepatic injury, and/or HCC compared to mutation carriers with normal ALA 1

Prognosis

  • Currently, the prognosis for AIP patients is good, but physicians must remain aware of potentially fatal outcomes 2
  • Neurological symptoms may improve weeks to months after therapy, even when little response was noted during treatment 6
  • Some patients experience prolonged remission after hemin treatment 6
  • The majority of symptomatic patients (>90%) experience only one or a few attacks in their lifetime and maintain good quality of life 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

An update of clinical management of acute intermittent porphyria.

The application of clinical genetics, 2015

Research

Acute intermittent porphyria: clinical analysis of nine cases.

Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed, 1994

Guideline

ALAD Deficiency Diagnosis and Management

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Therapeutic strategies for acute intermittent porphyria.

Intractable & rare diseases research, 2020

Guideline

Porfiria Aguda

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.