What is the life expectancy of a 74-year-old individual with multiple myeloma and a history of diabetes?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Life Expectancy for a 74-Year-Old with Multiple Myeloma

A 74-year-old with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma can expect a median survival of approximately 3-4 years (31-40 months) with standard treatment regimens, though this varies significantly based on disease stage, cytogenetics, treatment response, and the presence of diabetes as a comorbidity. 1, 2

Current Survival Data for This Age Group

The most relevant survival data for elderly patients comes from clinical trials specifically evaluating this population:

  • Patients aged 65 or older treated with melphalan/prednisone/bortezomib (MPB) demonstrated a 3-year overall survival rate of 68.5%, meaning approximately two-thirds of patients in this age group survive at least 3 years. 1

  • Patients treated with melphalan/prednisone/thalidomide (MPT) showed median overall survival of 40 months (approximately 3.3 years), compared to 31 months with older melphalan/prednisone regimens. 1

  • The 5-year relative survival rate for multiple myeloma has improved to 58% during 2011-2017, representing substantial progress, though this includes all age groups and younger patients typically fare better. 2

Impact of Age 74 Specifically

At age 74, this patient falls into the "elderly" category but not the "very elderly" (≥75 years) group:

  • Patients aged 65-74 years comprise approximately 35-41% of multiple myeloma patients in clinical trials, and outcomes in this age range are generally better than those ≥75 years. 1

  • Advanced age increases the odds of receiving no treatment by 7% per year of age, which can significantly impact survival if treatment is delayed or withheld. 1

Critical Impact of Diabetes

The presence of diabetes substantially affects prognosis:

  • Pre-existing diabetes is associated with a significantly higher all-cause mortality risk (hazard ratio 1.509,95% CI: 1.023-2.225, P=0.037) compared to patients without diabetes. 3

  • Patients with diabetes have higher rates of renal impairment at diagnosis (serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL) and lower rates of renal impairment reversal, which independently worsens prognosis. 3

  • During treatment, 67.6% of diabetic patients experience hyperglycemia and 17.6% experience hypoglycemia, requiring antidiabetic therapy changes in approximately 29% of cases. 3

Factors That Determine Where This Patient Falls in the Survival Range

Disease stage and biology are the strongest predictors:

  • International Staging System (ISS) Stage I patients have significantly better survival than Stage III patients, with β2-microglobulin and serum albumin levels being the key determinants. 1

  • High-risk cytogenetics [del(13), t(4;14), del(17p)] are associated with poorer outcomes, and these features should be assessed via FISH analysis or conventional karyotyping. 1

  • Renal function at diagnosis is critical: creatinine clearance <30 mL/min indicates worse prognosis, though modern bortezomib-based regimens show efficacy regardless of renal impairment. 1

Treatment Approach That Maximizes Survival

For a 74-year-old, bortezomib-based combinations are preferred over thalidomide-based regimens:

  • Melphalan/prednisone/bortezomib (MPB) is a Category 1 recommendation and shows superior outcomes with median survival from start of subsequent therapy of 30.2 months after MPB versus 21.9 months after other regimens. 1

  • MPB demonstrates efficacy unaffected by advanced age, renal impairment, and adverse cytogenetics, making it particularly suitable for elderly patients with comorbidities. 1

  • Complete response (CR) rates are higher with MPB (11%) compared to MPT (2%), and CR is associated with improved survival in the non-transplant setting. 1

Important Caveats for This Patient

Diabetes management during myeloma treatment is critical:

  • Dexamethasone, a cornerstone of most myeloma regimens, causes significant hyperglycemia in diabetic patients, requiring close glucose monitoring and frequent antidiabetic therapy adjustments. 3

  • The combination of diabetes and myeloma increases infection risk, particularly pneumonia, which is already elevated with novel agents like daratumumab (31.3% grade ≥3 infections). 1

Comorbidity burden matters significantly:

  • Patients with one comorbidity have 19% increased mortality risk (HR 1.19), with two comorbidities 38% increased risk (HR 1.38), and three or more comorbidities 72% increased risk (HR 1.72). 4

  • Specific comorbidities that worsen prognosis include chronic kidney disease, heart failure, arrhythmia, and cerebrovascular disease, all of which are more common in diabetic patients. 4

Realistic Prognosis Summary

For a 74-year-old with diabetes and newly diagnosed multiple myeloma:

  • Best-case scenario (standard-risk disease, good performance status, optimal treatment): 5-7 years median survival is achievable. 2

  • Most likely scenario (typical presentation, diabetes well-controlled): 3-4 years median survival with modern therapy. 1

  • Worst-case scenario (high-risk cytogenetics, poor renal function, multiple comorbidities): 2-3 years or less. 1, 3, 4

The disease remains incurable, and nearly all patients eventually experience relapse, typically requiring four or more different lines of therapy throughout their disease course. 2

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Current Outlook for Multiple Myeloma Life Expectancy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Pre-existing diabetes mellitus in patients with multiple myeloma.

European journal of haematology, 2012

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.