What is the best X-ray view for a patient with a history of gouty arthritis, obesity, and hypertension, who has developed an oozing wound on the ankle after 1 week of treatment with coamoxiclav (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Recommended X-ray Views for Ankle with Oozing Wound Post-Antibiotic Treatment

For this patient with an oozing ankle wound after one week of coamoxiclav treatment, order standard three-view ankle radiographs (anteroposterior, lateral, and mortise views) as the initial imaging study to evaluate for underlying osteomyelitis, and consider adding an axial Harris-Beath view if calcaneal involvement is suspected. 1, 2

Standard Radiographic Protocol

The three standard views are essential and should include:

  • Anteroposterior (AP) view - evaluates the tibiotalar joint and distal tibia/fibula 1
  • Lateral view - assesses anterior and posterior ankle structures and alignment 1
  • Mortise view - critical for evaluating the ankle mortise and detecting subtle fractures or joint space abnormalities 1

These three views should extend to include the base of the fifth metatarsal bone distal to the tuberosity 1. This standard protocol has 92-99% sensitivity for detecting ankle pathology 1.

Weight-Bearing vs Non-Weight-Bearing Considerations

  • Weight-bearing radiographs are preferred when clinically feasible, as they provide important information about joint stability and alignment that may not be apparent on non-weight-bearing films 1, 2, 3
  • However, given this patient has an oozing wound with likely pain and possible infection, non-weight-bearing views are acceptable and appropriate for initial evaluation 1
  • A medial clear space of <4 mm on weight-bearing films confirms ankle stability if this becomes relevant 1

Special Considerations for This Clinical Scenario

Suspected Osteomyelitis Evaluation

Given the oozing wound and history of gouty arthritis (which can mimic infection), radiographs serve as the essential first-line imaging:

  • Plain radiographs can demonstrate bone destruction, periosteal reaction, trabecular coarsening, cortical erosions, and soft-tissue swelling associated with osteomyelitis 1
  • Radiographs are neither sensitive nor specific for early infection - they may appear normal in acute osteomyelitis or show only subtle changes 1
  • Classic radiographic changes of osteomyelitis include cortical erosion, periosteal reaction, and mixed lucency and sclerosis 1

Additional View for Heel/Calcaneal Pathology

If the oozing wound involves the heel region or if gouty tophi are suspected in the calcaneus:

  • Add an axial Harris-Beath view, which is optimal for evaluating calcifications and pathology in the heel 2
  • This view is particularly valuable for determining intra-articular extent of calcaneal abnormalities 2

Bilateral Imaging Consideration

For patients with diabetes or suspected Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy (relevant given obesity and hypertension history):

  • Obtain bilateral weight-bearing plain X-rays if the patient can tolerate this, as temperature and structural differences between feet aid diagnosis 3
  • Look for joint malalignment, subluxation, and fracture displacement that suggest Charcot arthropathy 3

Algorithm for Next Steps Based on Initial Radiograph Results

If Radiographs Show Classic Osteomyelitis Changes:

  • Treat for presumptive osteomyelitis after obtaining appropriate specimens for culture 1
  • Consider bone biopsy if the etiologic agent or antibiotic susceptibilities are unpredictable 1

If Radiographs Are Normal or Equivocal:

  • Treat the soft-tissue infection for 2 weeks, then repeat plain radiographs 2-4 weeks later to look for interval development of bony changes 1
  • If clinical suspicion for osteomyelitis remains high despite normal radiographs, MRI is the preferred next imaging study 1, 2
  • MRI has high sensitivity and specificity for acute osteomyelitis, and a negative MRI effectively excludes the diagnosis 1

If Radiographs Show Findings Consistent But Not Characteristic of Osteomyelitis:

Three options exist 1:

  1. Obtain MRI (preferred) or nuclear medicine scan with leukocyte/immunoglobulin techniques 1
  2. Provide empirical antibiotic therapy for 2-4 weeks then repeat radiographs to assess for progression 1
  3. Perform bone biopsy (percutaneous under fluoroscopic or CT guidance) if diagnosis remains in doubt or for mid/hind-foot lesions 1

Critical Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not rely solely on radiographs to exclude osteomyelitis - they have low sensitivity for early infection and may remain normal for 10-14 days after onset 1
  • Do not order CT or MRI as the initial study - plain radiographs must come first per established protocols 1
  • Do not assume gouty tophi exclude infection - these patients are at risk for both conditions simultaneously, and tophi can become secondarily infected 4, 5
  • Avoid manipulating the ankle prior to radiographs unless there is neurovascular deficit or critical skin injury, as this may complicate management 1

Context-Specific Considerations for This Patient

Given the history of gouty arthritis:

  • Radiographs may show chronic changes from gout including joint space narrowing, erosions with overhanging edges, and soft-tissue masses (tophi) 4, 6
  • These chronic gouty changes can be difficult to distinguish from osteomyelitis on plain films alone 1
  • The oozing wound could represent an ulcerated tophus rather than primary infection 5, 7

The failure to improve after one week of coamoxiclav suggests:

  • Possible underlying osteomyelitis requiring longer treatment duration 1
  • Inadequate antibiotic coverage (consider culture-directed therapy) 1
  • Non-infectious process such as gouty flare with ulcerated tophus 5

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Radiographic Evaluation of Suspected Heel Calcification

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Diagnosis of Charcot Neuro-Osteoarthropathy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

An Unusual Presentation of Gout: Tophi in the Middle Ear.

The journal of international advanced otology, 2016

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.