Can Non-Cardiologist Providers Read EKG Tracings?
Yes, non-cardiologist providers can and should read EKG tracings, but the interpretation must be performed by a physician qualified to interpret ECGs—computer interpretation alone is not sufficient for clinical decision-making. 1
Qualification Requirements for EKG Interpretation
- A properly interpreted ECG requires interpretation by a physician qualified to interpret ECGs, not just computer-generated readings 1
- Computer-interpreted ECGs show significant discrepancies with cardiologist interpretations in 6.1% of cases for potentially clinically significant findings and 12.5% for non-clinically significant changes 2
- Primary care physicians can achieve good agreement with cardiologists in ECG interpretation when following systematic approaches 3
- The responsibility for correctly interpreting an ECG lies with the physician, who must recognize patient-dependent errors, operator-dependent errors, and artifact 4
When Non-Cardiologist Providers Should Interpret EKGs
Patients with Known Cardiovascular Disease
- All patients with known cardiovascular disease require baseline ECG interpretation for initial evaluation, response to therapy, and follow-up 1
- Serial ECGs are indicated when symptoms change, signs evolve, or relevant laboratory findings emerge 1
- Preoperative ECG interpretation is recommended for all patients with known cardiovascular disease undergoing cardiac or noncardiac surgery 1
Patients with Suspected Cardiovascular Disease
- ECG interpretation is indicated for patients presenting with cardiac symptoms including chest pain, dyspnea, palpitations, and syncope 5, 6
- Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome require timely ECG interpretation to guide emergent reperfusion therapy 5
- ECG evaluation is valuable when cardiac abnormality is suspected based on symptoms, abnormal physical findings, previous abnormal ECGs, or other laboratory abnormalities 1
High-Risk Patients
- Patients at increased risk for developing cardiac disease warrant periodic ECG interpretation (every 1-5 years) 1
- Risk factors include hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and family history of premature coronary artery disease 7
Clinical Utility in Primary Care Settings
- ECG interpretation in primary care changes management in 30.6% of patients with suspected cardiovascular symptoms 3
- The most common management changes include avoiding unnecessary cardiology referrals (34%), initiating appropriate referrals (20%), and modifying cardiovascular therapy (40%) 3
- In patients with chest pain, a normal ECG (likelihood ratio 0.06) and abnormal ECG (likelihood ratio 13.3) are highly useful for distinguishing patients likely or unlikely to experience cardiac events 3
- ECG interpretation can reduce unnecessary referrals considerably when combined with history and physical examination 3
Systematic Approach to Interpretation
- Following a specific routine and methodical analysis ensures accurate interpretation 4
- Current ECG tracings should always be compared with previous tracings 4
- A stepwise approach helps primary care physicians systematically interpret ECG tracings 6
- When uncertain, ECGs can be transmitted for inter-consultation with a more experienced reader 4
Important Limitations and Caveats
- Computer algorithms exist ubiquitously but can be sources of erroneous information 6
- ECG interpretation should always be performed in the clinical context of the patient 5
- For patients with acute symptoms suggesting life-threatening conditions, in-person evaluation in an emergency setting is preferable to remote ECG evaluation 5
- ECG alone may not be sufficient for definitive diagnosis in complex cases, and additional cardiac testing may be necessary 5
- Even with computer-interpreted normal ECGs, rare patients will have important cardiac outcomes, though immediate physician review would not have changed their emergency department course in most cases 2
Special Considerations for Non-Physician Providers
- Triage nurses can accurately identify ECG patterns indicative of time-dependent conditions correlated with major acute cardiovascular events, with 84.6% sensitivity for detecting abnormalities in patients who develop acute cardiovascular events 8
- However, formal physician interpretation remains the standard of care for clinical decision-making 1