Can a non-cardiologist provider read an electrocardiogram (EKG) tracing, especially for patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Non-Cardiologist Providers Read EKG Tracings?

Yes, non-cardiologist providers can and should read EKG tracings, but the interpretation must be performed by a physician qualified to interpret ECGs—computer interpretation alone is not sufficient for clinical decision-making. 1

Qualification Requirements for EKG Interpretation

  • A properly interpreted ECG requires interpretation by a physician qualified to interpret ECGs, not just computer-generated readings 1
  • Computer-interpreted ECGs show significant discrepancies with cardiologist interpretations in 6.1% of cases for potentially clinically significant findings and 12.5% for non-clinically significant changes 2
  • Primary care physicians can achieve good agreement with cardiologists in ECG interpretation when following systematic approaches 3
  • The responsibility for correctly interpreting an ECG lies with the physician, who must recognize patient-dependent errors, operator-dependent errors, and artifact 4

When Non-Cardiologist Providers Should Interpret EKGs

Patients with Known Cardiovascular Disease

  • All patients with known cardiovascular disease require baseline ECG interpretation for initial evaluation, response to therapy, and follow-up 1
  • Serial ECGs are indicated when symptoms change, signs evolve, or relevant laboratory findings emerge 1
  • Preoperative ECG interpretation is recommended for all patients with known cardiovascular disease undergoing cardiac or noncardiac surgery 1

Patients with Suspected Cardiovascular Disease

  • ECG interpretation is indicated for patients presenting with cardiac symptoms including chest pain, dyspnea, palpitations, and syncope 5, 6
  • Patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome require timely ECG interpretation to guide emergent reperfusion therapy 5
  • ECG evaluation is valuable when cardiac abnormality is suspected based on symptoms, abnormal physical findings, previous abnormal ECGs, or other laboratory abnormalities 1

High-Risk Patients

  • Patients at increased risk for developing cardiac disease warrant periodic ECG interpretation (every 1-5 years) 1
  • Risk factors include hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, smoking, and family history of premature coronary artery disease 7

Clinical Utility in Primary Care Settings

  • ECG interpretation in primary care changes management in 30.6% of patients with suspected cardiovascular symptoms 3
  • The most common management changes include avoiding unnecessary cardiology referrals (34%), initiating appropriate referrals (20%), and modifying cardiovascular therapy (40%) 3
  • In patients with chest pain, a normal ECG (likelihood ratio 0.06) and abnormal ECG (likelihood ratio 13.3) are highly useful for distinguishing patients likely or unlikely to experience cardiac events 3
  • ECG interpretation can reduce unnecessary referrals considerably when combined with history and physical examination 3

Systematic Approach to Interpretation

  • Following a specific routine and methodical analysis ensures accurate interpretation 4
  • Current ECG tracings should always be compared with previous tracings 4
  • A stepwise approach helps primary care physicians systematically interpret ECG tracings 6
  • When uncertain, ECGs can be transmitted for inter-consultation with a more experienced reader 4

Important Limitations and Caveats

  • Computer algorithms exist ubiquitously but can be sources of erroneous information 6
  • ECG interpretation should always be performed in the clinical context of the patient 5
  • For patients with acute symptoms suggesting life-threatening conditions, in-person evaluation in an emergency setting is preferable to remote ECG evaluation 5
  • ECG alone may not be sufficient for definitive diagnosis in complex cases, and additional cardiac testing may be necessary 5
  • Even with computer-interpreted normal ECGs, rare patients will have important cardiac outcomes, though immediate physician review would not have changed their emergency department course in most cases 2

Special Considerations for Non-Physician Providers

  • Triage nurses can accurately identify ECG patterns indicative of time-dependent conditions correlated with major acute cardiovascular events, with 84.6% sensitivity for detecting abnormalities in patients who develop acute cardiovascular events 8
  • However, formal physician interpretation remains the standard of care for clinical decision-making 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Electrocardiography in primary care; is it useful?

International journal of cardiology, 2000

Guideline

Evaluation of ECG Images for Clinical Assessment

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

The Electrocardiogram: Still a Useful Tool in the Primary Care Office.

The Medical clinics of North America, 2019

Guideline

Medical Clearance Algorithm for Cardiac Conditions

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.