What are the dose volume constraints for organs at risk (OARs), including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord, in a patient undergoing breast cancer radiation therapy?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 6, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Dose Volume Constraints for Organs at Risk in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

For breast cancer radiotherapy, the most critical OAR constraints are: lung exposure limited to 3-3.5 cm maximum on radiograph with V20 <40%, heart dose minimized with mean dose <2.5 Gy for left-sided lesions, and spinal cord maximum dose <50 Gy for conventional fractionation. 1

Lung Dose Constraints

The lung constraints are well-established across multiple NCCN guidelines and should be strictly adhered to:

  • Maximum lung tissue in treatment field: 3-3.5 cm as projected on radiograph at isocenter 2, 1
  • Minimum lung tissue required: 1-1.5 cm 2, 1
  • V20 (volume receiving ≥20 Gy): <40% for both lungs combined 1
  • Mean lung dose: ≤20 Gy 1
  • Preferred mean lung dose with advanced techniques: <8.5 Gy 1

These constraints are designed to minimize the risk of radiation pneumonitis, which can be a serious complication. 2 When using regional nodal irradiation, the ipsilateral lung V20 should be kept below 35% when possible. 3

Heart Dose Constraints

For left-sided breast lesions, cardiac sparing is paramount given the long-term survival of most breast cancer patients:

  • Minimize heart volume in tangential fields to the greatest extent possible 2, 1
  • Volume-based constraints: 60 Gy to <1/3 of heart volume, 45 Gy to <2/3 of heart volume, 40 Gy to <100% of heart volume 1
  • Mean heart dose: <2.5 Gy (strongly preferred for left-sided lesions) 4
  • For younger long-term survivors: total heart dose limited to 30 Gy 1
  • When using adaptive treatment planning algorithms: mean heart dose ≤500 cGy (5 Gy) 3

The emphasis on cardiac constraints reflects the recognition that even modest cardiac doses can increase late cardiac mortality in long-term survivors. 4 Modern techniques including IMRT, deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH), and prone positioning can significantly reduce cardiac exposure compared to conventional techniques. 2

Spinal Cord Dose Constraints

Spinal cord tolerance is critical when treating regional nodes:

  • Maximum spinal cord dose: 50 Gy for once-daily conventional fractionation (including scatter) 1
  • Maximum spinal cord dose: 41 Gy for twice-daily accelerated hyperfractionation 1

These constraints apply primarily when treating supraclavicular and axillary nodal regions. 2

CT-Based Treatment Planning Requirements

CT-based treatment planning is strongly encouraged (essentially mandatory in modern practice) to accurately identify and minimize exposure to OARs. 2, 1, 4

This allows for:

  • Precise delineation of lung and heart volumes 2, 4
  • Evaluation of dose distribution to critical structures 2
  • Optimization of treatment techniques to meet dose constraints 2

Treatment Delivery Specifications

Standard delivery parameters that impact OAR exposure:

  • Bolus should NOT be used for standard whole breast treatment 1, 4
  • High-energy photons (≥10 MV) indicated for large-breasted women to improve dose homogeneity 1
  • Weekly imaging for setup verification 4
  • Daily imaging NOT routinely recommended 4

Common Pitfalls and Caveats

Critical considerations to avoid OAR complications:

  • Avoid field overlap between adjacent treatment areas to prevent hot spots 4
  • For left-sided lesions, cardiac irradiation techniques must be minimized due to known increases in late cardiac mortality 4
  • When treating internal mammary nodes, CT planning is mandatory to evaluate heart and lung dose 2
  • Respiratory control techniques (DIBH, prone positioning) should be considered to further reduce OAR doses, particularly for cardiac structures 2

When 3D conformal techniques cannot meet OAR constraints, transition to IMRT is clinically indicated without compromising locoregional control. 3 This adaptive approach maintains the therapeutic ratio by preserving cancer control outcomes while meeting critical OAR constraints. 3

References

Guideline

Dose Constraints for 2D Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Breast Radiotherapy Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.