What is the incidence of pleural injuries in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) with supracostal versus subcostal access?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 7, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Incidence of Pleural Injuries in PCNL: Supracostal vs Subcostal Access

Pleural complications occur in approximately 15% of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) procedures overall, with supracostal access carrying significantly higher risk than subcostal approaches. 1

Overall Pleural Injury Rates

The Society of Interventional Radiology quality improvement guidelines establish a threshold of 15% for pleural complications (pneumothorax, empyema, or hemothorax) from percutaneous nephrolithotomy, which is substantially higher than the 1% threshold for simple percutaneous nephrostomy procedures. 1

Supracostal Access-Specific Rates

Above the 12th Rib

  • Pleural injury incidence: 4.2% when supracostal puncture is performed above the 12th rib 2
  • This represents a relatively safe approach when supracostal access is necessary 2

Above the 11th Rib

  • Significantly higher complication rates occur with 11th rib access compared to 12th rib access 2
  • Should be limited to cases of absolute necessity due to elevated pleural injury risk 2

Combined Supracostal Data

  • Prospective studies report 5% chest complication rate requiring chest tube insertion with supracostal access 3
  • Another series found 3% overall pleural complication rate in patients undergoing PCNL, with 4.2% in those receiving supracostal punctures 4

Subcostal/Infracostal Access Rates

  • 2% pleural injury rate in patients with only infracostal punctures 4
  • Subcostal upper calyx access shows 1.9% complication rate, comparable to non-upper pole access (2.9%) 5
  • Subcostal approaches carry minimal pleural risk and are preferred when anatomically feasible 2

Risk Factors for Higher Pleural Injury Rates

Patient Factors

  • Low BMI is independently associated with higher pleural injury risk on multivariate analysis 4
  • Age <27 years significantly increases risk of pleural complications 4
  • Right-sided procedures have significantly higher pleural injury incidence (4.0%) compared to left-sided (1.8%) 4
  • Non-obese patients (BMI <30) undergoing supracostal access have 25% risk of chest tube insertion versus 6.9% in obese patients 5

Laterality Considerations

  • Left supracostal PCNL carries lower risk (7.0%) compared to right supracostal (24.2%) for chest tube requirement 5

Clinical Implications and Monitoring

Immediate postoperative chest radiography is mandatory after any supracostal access to detect pneumothorax or hydrothorax early. 2, 3 Pneumothorax is more common when upper-pole calyceal puncture is used, particularly with intercostal approaches. 1

Delayed Complications

While most pleural injuries present immediately postoperatively or during hospitalization, delayed nephropleural fistulas can occur up to 8 days after the procedure, even after uneventful initial recovery. 6 This underscores the importance of patient education regarding warning signs.

Common Pitfalls

  • Failure to obtain postoperative chest X-ray after supracostal access can miss significant but asymptomatic pleural injuries 2, 3
  • Assuming subcostal access eliminates pleural risk entirely—while much lower (2%), pleural injury can still occur with infracostal punctures 4
  • Underestimating risk in thin, young patients who have anatomically less protective tissue between kidney and pleura 4

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.