CT Abdomen/Pelvis With and Without Contrast for Post-Sigmoid Colectomy RLQ Pain
In a patient with prior sigmoid colectomy for diverticulitis presenting with RLQ pain, CT abdomen/pelvis with IV contrast is the optimal imaging modality because it provides comprehensive evaluation for both recurrent diverticulitis (which can occur in remaining colon segments at 4.2% rate) and alternative diagnoses including right-sided diverticulitis, abscess formation, anastomotic complications, and other causes of RLQ pain with 95% sensitivity. 1, 2
Why CT With Contrast is the Gold Standard
Diagnostic Accuracy and Comprehensive Evaluation
- CT has 95% sensitivity and 94% specificity for detecting acute inflammatory conditions in the abdomen, making it superior to all other imaging modalities for evaluating RLQ pain 1
- The modality excels at identifying both appendiceal and non-appendiceal pathology, with studies showing CT diagnosis concordant with clinical diagnosis in 94.3% of cases for non-appendicitis conditions 1
- IV contrast enhancement is critical because it improves detection of bowel wall abnormalities, solid organ injuries, vascular pathology, and intraabdominal fluid collections 3
Specific Relevance to Post-Colectomy Patients
Recurrent Diverticulitis Risk
- Recurrent diverticulitis occurs in 4.2% of patients after sigmoid colectomy, with mean time to recurrence of 55 months (range 6-109 months), and all recurrences are confirmed by CT scan 2
- The remaining colon (including right colon, transverse colon, and descending colon) remains at risk for new diverticular disease 4, 5
Right-Sided Diverticulitis Detection
- Right-sided diverticulitis presents identically to appendicitis and is increasingly recognized as a cause of RLQ pain, particularly in older patients 6, 7
- CT findings of right colon diverticulitis include thickening of the intestinal wall and pericolonic inflammation, present in 100% of cases, with associated diverticular abscess identified correctly preoperatively in all cases 7
- Right colonic diverticulitis and obstruction account for 8% and 3% respectively of RLQ pain presentations 1
Complication Detection
- CT accurately identifies abscess formation (present in 16% of diverticulitis cases), free air (10%), and fistula formation (1%) 4
- The modality has 96-98% accuracy for detecting complications of diverticulitis including abscess extent, which directly determines whether medical versus surgical management is appropriate 1
- CT detects unsuspected carcinoma in 7% of patients presenting with presumed diverticulitis, a critical finding that changes management entirely 4
The "With and Without" Protocol Advantage
Enhanced Lesion Characterization
- Oral and/or colonic contrast may be helpful for bowel luminal visualization when combined with IV contrast, allowing differentiation between bowel wall thickening and intraluminal contents 1
- The dual-phase protocol (without and with IV contrast) provides superior characterization of abscesses versus phlegmon, which determines need for percutaneous drainage versus medical management 1
Anastomotic Assessment
- Non-contrast images establish baseline attenuation of tissues, while post-contrast images reveal enhancement patterns that identify anastomotic leaks, strictures, or inflammatory changes at the surgical site 1
Alternative Diagnoses Effectively Evaluated
High-Yield Differential for RLQ Pain Post-Colectomy
- Infectious enterocolitis (typhlitis, inflammatory terminal ileitis): 41% of patients with non-appendiceal CT diagnoses require hospitalization and 22% need surgical or image-guided intervention 1
- Ureteral stone disease: CT without contrast component is optimal for stone detection 1
- Inflammatory bowel disease: CT enterography characteristics visible on standard CT 1
- Benign adnexal masses, pelvic congestion syndrome, constipation, colitis: most common CT diagnoses in patients with RLQ pain when appendicitis is excluded 1
Clinical Impact on Management
Triage and Treatment Planning
- CT findings directly determine hospitalization need: 41% hospitalization rate when CT identifies pathology versus only 14% when CT is negative 1, 8
- Surgical or interventional procedures required in 22% when CT positive versus only 4% when CT negative, demonstrating the modality's critical role in resource allocation 1, 8
- CT facilitates selection of patients for medical rather than surgical therapy by revealing presence and extent of abscess formation 1
Avoiding Pitfalls
- Plain radiographs are extremely limited in evaluating diverticulitis complications, significantly less sensitive than CT for detecting small amounts of free air or abscess 1
- Ultrasound misdiagnoses 17% of uncomplicated diverticulitis and 79% of complicated diverticulitis, with inability to penetrate extensive soft tissue or air-filled structures 1
- Contrast enema is less sensitive for extracolonic complications including abscesses when compared to CT 1
Key Clinical Considerations
When Imaging May Not Be Necessary
- Patients with classic presentation and no suspected complications may not require imaging if they have typical symptoms of uncomplicated recurrent diverticulitis 1
- However, in a post-surgical patient with RLQ pain (atypical location), imaging is essential because the differential is broad and includes surgical complications 1
Radiation Exposure Context
- While CT involves radiation exposure (☢☢☢☢), the diagnostic yield justifies the risk when surgical history and atypical pain location create diagnostic uncertainty 1
- The high negative predictive value prevents unnecessary surgery: among patients with negative CT showing only stool, only 14% require hospitalization 8