What is the clinical significance of the Lillie score in assessing disease severity, particularly in conditions like cancer, and how should it guide treatment planning for a patient with impaired health status and potential comorbidities?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Lille Score: Clinical Significance and Application in Alcoholic Hepatitis

The Lille score is a validated prognostic tool specifically designed for alcoholic hepatitis that must be calculated on day 7 of corticosteroid therapy to identify treatment non-responders and guide decisions about continuing or stopping corticosteroids. 1

What the Lille Score Measures

The Lille score is not a general cancer severity assessment tool. It is a disease-specific calculator for alcoholic hepatitis that predicts response to corticosteroid therapy and short-term mortality. 1

The score incorporates six variables measured at baseline (day 0) and day 7 of treatment:

  • Age in years 1
  • Albumin at day 0 (g/L) 1
  • Total bilirubin at day 0 and day 7 (μmol/L) 1
  • Prothrombin time (seconds) 1
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine ≥1.3 mg/dL) 1

Score Interpretation and Mortality Risk

The Lille score stratifies patients into three response categories with distinct survival outcomes:

  • Complete responders (score ≤0.16): 91.1% 28-day survival 1
  • Partial responders (score 0.16-0.56): 79.4% 28-day survival 1
  • Null responders (score ≥0.56): 53.3% 28-day survival 1

Using the alternative threshold of 0.45, patients with scores ≥0.45 have only 20-30% six-month survival compared to 70-80% for responders with scores <0.45. 1

Treatment Decision Algorithm

For patients with Lille score ≥0.56 (null responders): Corticosteroid therapy must be stopped immediately. 1 These patients derive no benefit from continued steroid exposure and face significant mortality risk.

For patients with scores 0.45-0.56 (borderline zone): The decision to continue corticosteroids should be individualized based on:

  • Presence of infection or other contraindications 1
  • Trajectory of clinical deterioration
  • Availability of liver transplantation 1

For patients with scores <0.45 (responders): Continue corticosteroid therapy as these patients demonstrate treatment benefit. 1

Timing Considerations

  • Standard assessment: Day 7 of corticosteroid treatment is the validated timepoint for Lille score calculation 1
  • Early assessment: Day 4 calculation shows similar prognostic performance but requires further validation before routine clinical use 1

Integration with Other Prognostic Tools

Combining the Lille score with the MELD score provides optimal risk stratification for both short-term (Lille) and medium-term (MELD) mortality prediction in alcoholic hepatitis. 1 This dual approach allows:

  • Immediate treatment decisions based on Lille score at day 7
  • Longer-term prognostication and transplant evaluation using MELD

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Do not use the Lille score at baseline - it requires day 7 bilirubin to calculate the critical "evolution in bilirubin" component 1
  • Do not apply this score to cancer patients - despite the question's context about cancer, the Lille score has no validated role in oncology assessment
  • Do not continue corticosteroids in null responders hoping for delayed response - the data clearly show futility and potential harm 1

Relevance to Cancer Patients

The Lille score has no established role in cancer severity assessment or treatment planning. For cancer patients requiring comprehensive assessment, validated tools include:

  • Comorbidity assessment: ACE-27, Charlson Comorbidity Index, CIRS, or OARS questionnaire 2
  • Geriatric assessment: G-8 screening tool, Mini-Cog for cognition, functional status measures 2
  • Cancer-specific tools: CARG toxicity calculator for chemotherapy risk, disease-specific staging systems 2

If the question intended to ask about severity scoring in cancer patients with comorbidities, the appropriate approach involves comprehensive geriatric assessment when ≥3 comorbidities are present, with particular attention to how comorbidities affect treatment tolerance and life expectancy. 2

References

Guideline

Lille Score Calculation and Clinical Application

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.