What are the signs of appendicitis?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 8, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Signs of Appendicitis

The classic presentation of appendicitis includes periumbilical pain migrating to the right lower quadrant, right lower quadrant tenderness with guarding, anorexia/nausea/vomiting, and fever, though this complete triad is present in only a minority of patients. 1, 2

Classic Clinical Signs

Pain Characteristics

  • Periumbilical pain that migrates to the right lower quadrant is one of the strongest discriminators for appendicitis in adults 1, 2
  • Right lower quadrant pain is the most reliable sign for ruling in acute appendicitis in adults 3
  • Pain typically begins as vague periumbilical discomfort before localizing to the right lower quadrant over hours 2
  • The pain location can vary with anatomical position of the appendix—atypical locations may present with epigastric or other non-classic pain patterns 4

Physical Examination Findings

  • Right lower quadrant tenderness (at McBurney's point, located one-third the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the umbilicus) is a key finding 5, 3
  • Abdominal rigidity and guarding are among the best signs for ruling in acute appendicitis in adults 3
  • Rebound tenderness indicates peritoneal irritation and is commonly present 4
  • Rovsing sign (pain in the right lower quadrant when palpating the left lower quadrant) occurs when pressure displaces gas and fluid, causing peritoneal irritation at the inflamed appendix 5, 3
  • Psoas sign (pain with hip extension) suggests retrocecal appendix location 3
  • Obturator sign (pain with internal rotation of the flexed hip) suggests pelvic appendix location 5, 3

Associated Symptoms

  • Anorexia, nausea, and intermittent vomiting are classic associated symptoms 1, 2
  • Low-grade fever is present, though reported rates vary from 30% to 80% in different populations 1, 2
  • Decreased or absent bowel sounds are reliable findings, particularly in children 3

Age-Related Variations

Elderly Patients (≥65 years)

  • The typical triad of migrating right lower quadrant pain, fever, and leukocytosis is infrequently observed in elderly patients 1
  • Signs of peritonitis are more common, including abdominal distension, generalized tenderness and guarding, rebound tenderness, and palpable abdominal mass 1
  • Symptoms may mimic ileus or bowel obstruction 1
  • Elderly patients have significantly higher rates of complicated/perforated appendicitis (18-70%) compared to younger patients (3-29%) 6
  • Comorbidities and concurrent medications may mask or complicate the clinical presentation 1

Laboratory Findings

  • Leukocytosis (elevated white blood cell count) is common but not diagnostic on its own 1, 7
  • Elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) is frequently present; when two or more inflammatory variables are increased, appendicitis is likely 1
  • Normal inflammatory markers have high negative predictive value (100% in some studies) for excluding appendicitis 1
  • In elderly patients, elevated CRP >101.9 mg/L may indicate perforation (AUC 0.811) 1
  • Procalcitonin has diagnostic value for identifying complicated appendicitis (AUC 0.94) 1

Imaging Signs

CT Findings

  • Appendiceal diameter ≥7 mm (some studies use 8.2-8.5 mm cutoff) 1, 2
  • Presence of appendicoliths/fecaliths predicts perforation with odds ratio of 2.47-2.67 1, 8, 2
  • Periappendiceal fat stranding 1
  • Absence of intraluminal gas 1
  • Focal wall defect has highest specificity (98.8%) for perforation 1
  • CT has sensitivity of 90-100% and specificity of 94.8-100% for diagnosing appendicitis 1, 5, 7

Ultrasound Findings

  • Non-compressible appendix >6 mm diameter 7
  • Ultrasound has average sensitivity of 87.1% and specificity of 89.2%, though visualization rates vary (35-65%) 1, 7
  • Bedside ultrasound shows mean sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 95% 1

MRI Findings

  • MRI demonstrates 96% sensitivity and 96% specificity for appendicitis diagnosis 1, 5
  • Particularly useful in pregnant patients 5

Plain Radiography

  • Fecal loading sign (cecum distended with stool containing innumerable punctate lucencies) has sensitivity of 97.05% and specificity of 85.33% 1
  • This sign disappears after appendectomy 1

Critical Clinical Pitfalls

  • Do not rely on clinical signs and symptoms alone for diagnosis, especially in elderly patients—imaging is essential 1
  • Scoring systems (Alvarado score) are useful for excluding appendicitis (low scores) but should not be used alone for diagnosis 1
  • Atypical presentations occur in approximately 50% of patients, requiring lower threshold for imaging 1
  • Female patients of childbearing age have more atypical presentations and lower diagnostic accuracy on ultrasound (false-positive rate 35.5% vs 6.2% in men) 1
  • Obesity significantly reduces diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound, with false diagnosis rates of 34.4% in obese men vs 6.2% in non-obese men 1
  • Delayed presentation increases perforation risk—elderly patients typically present later with higher perforation rates 1, 6

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Research

Acute Appendicitis: Efficient Diagnosis and Management.

American family physician, 2018

Guideline

Appendicitis Diagnosis Using Rovsing Sign

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Causes and Risk Factors of Appendicitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2026

Guideline

Fecalith-Associated Risk for Acute Appendicitis

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.