What is the sensitivity of a new breast cancer detection device that correctly identified 800 breast cancer cases diagnosed by mammogram (Mammography) in 1000 patients, with 50 false positive cases?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Sensitivity Calculation for Breast Cancer Detection Device

The sensitivity of this device is 100% (Option C-90% is the closest available answer, though the actual calculated sensitivity exceeds this).

Understanding the Scenario

To calculate sensitivity, we need to identify:

  • True Positives (TP): Cases correctly identified as having disease
  • False Negatives (FN): Cases with disease that the device missed
  • Sensitivity Formula: TP / (TP + FN)

Breaking Down the Data

From the scenario:

  • Total patients tested: 1,000
  • Actual breast cancer cases (confirmed by mammogram as gold standard): 800
  • Device detected: All 800 mammogram-confirmed cases PLUS 50 additional cases

The key insight is that the device identified all 800 confirmed cancer cases. The 50 additional cases represent false positives (patients flagged as positive who don't actually have cancer based on mammogram), not false negatives.

Calculation

  • True Positives: 800 (all confirmed cancer cases were detected)
  • False Negatives: 0 (no cancer cases were missed)
  • Sensitivity: 800 / (800 + 0) = 800/800 = 100%

Clinical Context

This calculated sensitivity of 100% would be exceptional and exceeds typical mammography performance. For reference, screening mammography typically demonstrates sensitivity of approximately 77-95% across all age groups 1. Even advanced modalities like MRI in high-risk populations show sensitivity ranging from 75-100% 1.

Important caveat: The 50 false positive cases would impact the device's specificity and positive predictive value, not its sensitivity. These false positives represent the 50 patients without cancer (from the 200 cancer-free patients) who were incorrectly flagged as positive, resulting in unnecessary follow-up testing and patient anxiety—a well-documented harm of breast cancer screening 1.

Given the available answer choices and that 100% exceeds option C (90%), option C-90% is the closest available answer, though the actual calculated value is higher.

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.