Management of Right Lower Quadrant Pain with Negative McBurney Sign
Obtain CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast immediately as the first-line diagnostic study, as this achieves 95% sensitivity and 94% specificity for appendicitis while identifying alternative diagnoses in 94.3% of cases. 1
Why CT is Essential Despite Negative Clinical Findings
The absence of McBurney sign does not exclude appendicitis—this is a critical pitfall that leads to delayed diagnosis and increased perforation rates. 1
- Classic symptoms (fever, leukocytosis, typical tenderness) are present in only 50% of appendicitis cases, making clinical examination alone unreliable 1
- Clinical determination of appendicitis has negative appendectomy rates as high as 25% when relying on examination alone 2
- Normal laboratory values and absence of fever do not exclude serious pathology, particularly in early appendicitis 1
Imaging Protocol
CT abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast without oral contrast is the optimal study to avoid delays while maintaining diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 90-100%, specificity 94.8-100%). 1
Why Not Ultrasound First?
While ultrasound can be considered in specific populations, it has significant limitations in this scenario:
- The appendix is not visualized in 20-81% of cases, creating diagnostic uncertainty 3
- Sensitivity ranges widely from 21% to 95.7% depending on operator experience and patient body habitus 3
- Equivocal ultrasound results require CT anyway, resulting in diagnostic delay without avoiding radiation 3
- CT identifies alternative diagnoses in 23-45% of cases presenting with suspected appendicitis, including right-sided colonic diverticulitis, bowel obstruction, colorectal malignancy, and mesenteric pathology 3
Broad Differential Diagnosis Beyond Appendicitis
The "slicing" pain quality and right lower quadrant location warrant consideration of multiple etiologies that CT can differentiate:
- Right colonic diverticulitis can precisely mimic appendicitis and is readily identified by CT 1
- Bowel obstruction, particularly if there is prior abdominal surgery history 3
- Colorectal malignancy, especially with history of rectal bleeding or unexplained weight loss 3
- Chronic appendicitis presents with atypical symptoms and milder tenderness, often diagnosed late due to lack of well-developed diagnostic criteria 4
- Ileocecal inflammatory conditions, epiploic appendagitis, omental pathology, and mesenteric conditions 5
Management Algorithm Based on CT Results
If CT Shows Acute Surgical Pathology (Appendicitis, Diverticulitis, Obstruction):
- Immediate surgical consultation 1
- NPO status, IV fluid resuscitation 3
- Broad-spectrum antibiotics 3
- 41% of patients with RLQ pain require hospitalization and 22% need surgical or image-guided intervention 1
If CT Shows Only Constipation or No Acute Findings:
- Initiate bowel regimen with stool softeners and/or osmotic laxatives 1
- Symptomatic pain relief with analgesics 1
- Reassessment within 24-48 hours 1
If CT is Negative but Symptoms Persist:
- Consider chronic appendicitis, which requires histopathologic confirmation after appendectomy 4
- Persistent pain failing to improve after 24-48 hours of conservative management warrants consideration of alternative diagnoses or delayed presentation 1
Critical Red Flags Requiring Reimaging
Do not assume initial negative imaging excludes pathology if clinical deterioration occurs:
- Fever development 1
- Persistent vomiting 1
- Worsening or peritoneal pain 1
- Inability to tolerate oral intake 1
- Development of local peritonitis during observation period 6
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Never discharge based solely on negative McBurney sign and normal labs—this risks missing early appendicitis or other serious pathology 2, 1
- Atypical presentations are common, including appendicitis with left lower quadrant pain due to long appendix projecting across midline or situs inversus 6
- Avoid relying on clinical scoring systems alone (like Alvarado score), as they have not improved diagnostic accuracy sufficiently 2
- Do not delay imaging in favor of prolonged observation when clinical suspicion exists, as this increases perforation risk 6