Can Ativan (lorazepam) be administered intramuscularly (IM)?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Can Ativan (Lorazepam) Be Given Intramuscularly?

Yes, Ativan (lorazepam) can be administered intramuscularly and is explicitly approved by the FDA for IM use, though it is not the preferred route for status epilepticus when IV access is available. 1

FDA-Approved IM Administration

  • Lorazepam IM is FDA-approved for preanesthetic use at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg up to a maximum of 4 mg, administered at least 2 hours before the anticipated procedure for optimum effect. 1
  • For status epilepticus, IM lorazepam is not preferred because therapeutic levels are not reached as quickly as with IV administration; however, when an intravenous port is unavailable, the IM route may prove useful. 1
  • Equipment to maintain a patent airway must be immediately available prior to administration regardless of route. 1

Clinical Practice Guidelines Support IM Use

  • The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends IM lorazepam at 0.2 mg/kg (maximum 6 mg per dose) for seizure management when IV access is unavailable, which can be repeated every 10-15 minutes. 2
  • Lorazepam is strongly preferred over diazepam for IM administration because it has fast onset, rapid and complete absorption, and no active metabolites, whereas diazepam has erratic absorption when given IM and should NOT be used via this route. 2
  • ESMO guidelines for delirium management list lorazepam 1 mg subcutaneous or IV as an option (noting it can also be given IM), though lower doses (0.25-0.5 mg) should be used in older or frail patients or those with COPD. 3

Key Advantages Over Diazepam IM

  • Lorazepam has superior IM absorption compared to diazepam, which has erratic and unreliable absorption and carries a risk of tissue necrosis when given intramuscularly. 4, 2
  • Historical pharmacokinetic data confirms that lorazepam is better absorbed after IM administration than diazepam, making it the benzodiazepine of choice for this route. 5

Critical Safety Considerations

  • Respiratory depression is a significant risk, particularly when combined with other sedatives, antipsychotics, or opioids—continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation is mandatory. 2
  • Common adverse effects include delirium, drowsiness, paradoxical agitation, and subcutaneous injection may cause local irritation. 3
  • Dose reduction is essential in elderly or frail patients and those with COPD, especially when co-administered with antipsychotics (use 0.25-0.5 mg instead of standard doses). 3
  • Increased risk of falls necessitates careful patient monitoring and environmental safety measures. 3

Clinical Context for IM Use

  • IM lorazepam combined with an antipsychotic is frequently recommended by experts for managing acute agitation in children and adolescents. 2
  • For acute agitation in adults, IM lorazepam may have a role as crisis medication in managing delirious patients with severe agitation and distress. 3
  • The IM route is particularly valuable when oral administration is refused or impractical and IV access cannot be rapidly established. 1

References

Guideline

Intramuscular Lorazepam Administration Guidelines

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Guideline

Administration of Diazepam

Praxis Medical Insights: Practical Summaries of Clinical Guidelines, 2025

Research

Comparison of the actions of diazepam and lorazepam.

British journal of anaesthesia, 1979

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.