Why would Nivolumab (nivolumab) be considered in a patient with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) and a tumor regression grade (TRG) of 1?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 9, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Nivolumab in TRG 1 Transitional Cell Carcinoma (Urothelial Carcinoma)

Nivolumab should be considered in TRG 1 (tumor regression grade 1) transitional cell carcinoma primarily as second-line therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy failure, based on its demonstrated survival benefit and superior response rates compared to chemotherapy in this setting. 1

Primary Indication: Post-Platinum Therapy

Nivolumab is FDA-approved and guideline-recommended for metastatic urothelial carcinoma that has progressed during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. 1 The TITAN-TCC trial specifically evaluated nivolumab in platinum-pretreated patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma and demonstrated:

  • Confirmed objective response rate of 33% (90% CI 24-42%), significantly exceeding the 20% threshold (p=0.0049), with 7% achieving complete responses 1
  • Enhanced efficacy when combined with ipilimumab boost in early non-responders, suggesting that patients with inadequate initial response can benefit from intensified immunotherapy 1

Clinical Context for TRG 1 Disease

If TRG 1 refers to minimal tumor regression after neoadjuvant therapy, this indicates chemotherapy-resistant disease that would be an ideal candidate for checkpoint inhibitor therapy based on the following rationale:

Mechanism of Benefit in Chemotherapy-Resistant Disease

  • Nivolumab works through immune activation rather than direct cytotoxicity, making it effective in tumors that have demonstrated resistance to platinum-based regimens 1, 2
  • Durable responses occur in 29% of previously treated patients, with median response duration of 12.9 months—substantially longer than chemotherapy 2
  • Long-term survival benefit: median overall survival of 22.4 months with 3-year survival rate of 44% in heavily pretreated patients 2

Treatment Algorithm for TRG 1 TCC

Initial Approach

  1. Start with nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks as monotherapy 1
  2. Assess response at week 8 using RECIST criteria 1

Response-Based Strategy

  • If partial or complete response at week 8: Continue nivolumab maintenance monotherapy 1
  • If stable or progressive disease at week 8: Add ipilimumab boost (nivolumab 1 mg/kg + ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks for 2-4 doses) 1
  • If late progression during maintenance: Administer ipilimumab boost using same schedule 1

Safety Profile

Nivolumab demonstrates manageable toxicity compared to chemotherapy alternatives:

  • Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occur in only 12-18% of patients, substantially lower than chemotherapy 1, 2
  • Most common serious toxicities: immune-mediated enterocolitis (11%) and diarrhea (6%) 1
  • Treatment-related mortality is rare (2%), primarily from immune-mediated enterocolitis 1
  • All toxicities are reversible with appropriate management 2

Critical Considerations

When NOT to Use Nivolumab

  • Active autoimmune disease requiring immunosuppression 3
  • Corticosteroid requirement >10 mg prednisone equivalent for cancer-related conditions 3
  • Disease progression within 6 months of adjuvant immunotherapy (though data in this specific setting are limited) 3

Predictive Factors

PD-L1 expression shows limited predictive utility in urothelial carcinoma, unlike other tumor types 4. Therefore:

  • Do not exclude patients based on PD-L1 status alone 4
  • T-cell infiltration at baseline correlates with response better than PD-L1 expression 4
  • Molecular subtyping may identify patients with enhanced nivolumab response who are sunitinib-resistant 4

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

  1. Premature discontinuation: Responses can develop late (median time to response 12 weeks), and some patients achieve complete responses more than 1 year after starting treatment 2
  2. Stopping at progression: Consider ipilimumab boost before abandoning immunotherapy entirely 1
  3. Overlooking durable responses: 3 of 5 patients who stopped nivolumab while in response continued responding for ≥45 weeks after discontinuation 2
  4. Ignoring immune-related adverse events: Monitor closely for enterocolitis, which accounts for most serious toxicities 1

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.