Subfascial Breast Augmentation Surgical Technique
Subfascial breast augmentation places the implant above the pectoralis muscle but below the pectoralis fascia, offering superior lower pole coverage, reduced capsular contracture rates (approximately 1%), elimination of animation deformity, and faster recovery compared to submuscular placement. 1, 2
Patient Selection and Preoperative Planning
- Ideal candidates include patients with adequate soft tissue coverage who desire natural breast shape without implant animation during muscle contraction 1, 3
- Relative contraindications include extremely thin patients where implant edge visibility may still occur despite fascial coverage 1
- Smoking and obesity increase complication rates and should be addressed preoperatively 4
- Implant selection: Both smooth and textured implants can be used, though anatomical high-cohesivity gel textured implants have been extensively studied in this plane 3, 5
Surgical Technique: Step-by-Step Approach
Incision Options
Three approaches are well-documented for subfascial augmentation:
- Inframammary approach: Most direct access to the subfascial plane 1, 3
- Periareolar approach: Allows radial dissection perpendicular to skin incision 1, 3
- Endoscopic transaxillary approach: Provides inconspicuous scarring with endoscopic visualization 5
Dissection Technique
Initial dissection phase:
- After skin incision, dissect parallel to the skin (similar to skin-sparing mastectomy technique) for approximately 4 cm 3
- For periareolar approach, incise breast parenchyma radially (perpendicular to skin incision) and vertically until the fascial layer is reached 3
- Critical landmark: Identify the well-defined pectoralis major fascia as the dissection plane 3, 5
Pocket creation:
- Open the pectoralis major fascia and continue dissection craniocaudally underneath the fasciae of the pectoralis, serratus, and rectus abdominis muscles 5
- The subfascial plane provides a clear, relatively avascular dissection plane that is easier to develop than submuscular dissection 1, 3
- For endoscopic transaxillary approach, use endoscopic assistance to visualize and dissect the fascial plane safely 5
Modified dual-plane option:
- For patients with ptosis or tubular breast deformity, consider the subfascial mini-muscle release dual-plane technique 6
- Split the pectoralis major muscle 3 cm above the lateral margin, then proceed with submuscular dissection superiorly 6
- Divide a small portion of the costal origin inferomedially to create the dual plane 6
Critical Intraoperative Measurements
Achieve optimal aesthetic proportions by ensuring:
- Distance from inferior areolar border to inframammary fold: 6-7 cm 3
- Distance from superior areolar border to uppermost breast point: 9-10.5 cm (1.5X the inferior measurement) 3
- Distance between implants: 2-3 cm 3
- Distance from medial areolar border to midsternal line: 9-10 cm 3
Implant Insertion and Closure
- Insert the implant into the subfascial pocket with careful attention to positioning 1, 3
- Verify symmetric placement and appropriate implant position before closure 3
- Close the fascial layer if it was opened during dissection 3
- Close breast parenchyma and skin in layers 3
Expected Outcomes and Complications
Advantages of subfascial placement:
- Extremely low capsular contracture rate: Meta-analysis shows 1.01% across 3,743 patients 2
- No animation deformity: Implant remains stable with pectoralis muscle contraction 1, 2
- Excellent lower pole coverage: Superior to subglandular placement in preventing implant edge visibility 1
- Natural breast shape: Smooth transition between soft tissues and implant in upper pole 3
- Faster recovery: Less postoperative pain compared to submuscular placement 2
Reported complications:
- Infection rate: 0.1% 2
- Capsular contracture (Baker grade II): 16% in one series, though meta-analysis shows 1.01% overall 2, 5
- Occasional rippling, malrotation, axillary banding, sensory deficit, and asymmetry have been reported 2
- Hematoma, wound-healing issues, and implant malposition occur rarely 6
Common Pitfalls and How to Avoid Them
- Inadequate fascial dissection: Ensure complete fascial coverage by identifying and staying in the correct plane throughout dissection 3, 5
- Implant malposition: Verify measurements intraoperatively and ensure symmetric pocket creation 3
- Thin patients: Consider alternative planes (submuscular or dual-plane) in extremely thin patients where fascial coverage may be insufficient 1
- Inadequate hemostasis: The subfascial plane can have bleeding points; achieve meticulous hemostasis before implant insertion 3
Postoperative Monitoring
- Breast implants require regular monitoring for rupture starting at 5-6 years post-surgery, with imaging every 2-3 years thereafter 7, 8
- Implants do not require routine replacement at predetermined intervals; replacement is indicated only when complications occur 7, 8
- Patients should follow the same breast cancer screening protocols as those without implants, with additional implant-displaced views during mammography 8