What are the implications of a shear wave velocity (SWV) value of 1.03 in a patient with potential liver disease?

Medical Advisory BoardAll articles are reviewed for accuracy by our Medical Advisory Board
Educational purpose only • Exercise caution as content is pending human review
Article Review Status
Submitted
Under Review
Approved

Last updated: January 10, 2026View editorial policy

Personalize

Help us tailor your experience

Which best describes you? Your choice helps us use language that's most understandable for you.

Shear Wave Velocity of 1.03 m/s: Clinical Interpretation

A shear wave velocity (SWV) of 1.03 m/s indicates minimal to no liver fibrosis and effectively rules out compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) in patients with suspected liver disease. 1

Understanding the Value

  • SWV of 1.03 m/s falls well below established thresholds for significant fibrosis, which typically begin at 1.22-1.37 m/s depending on the underlying etiology 1
  • This value is within the normal range (0.5-4.4 m/s measurement range for point SWE), indicating minimal liver stiffness 1
  • The Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL) 2024 guidelines emphasize that SWE provides quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis while allowing visualization of liver anatomy 1

Fibrosis Stage Interpretation

Based on established cutoff values from multiple guidelines:

  • For significant fibrosis (≥F2): Cutoffs range from 1.22-1.37 m/s 1
  • For cirrhosis (F4): Cutoffs range from 1.73-2.11 m/s 1
  • Your value of 1.03 m/s is substantially below these thresholds, making significant fibrosis or cirrhosis highly unlikely 1

Clinical Implications by Disease Etiology

Chronic Hepatitis C

  • Meta-analyses show sensitivity of 69% and specificity of 80% for significant fibrosis at cutoffs of 1.34-1.35 m/s 1
  • A value of 1.03 m/s has high negative predictive value for excluding significant disease 1

Chronic Hepatitis B

  • 2D-SWE studies demonstrate cutoffs of 7.1 kPa (approximately 1.54 m/s) for significant fibrosis 1
  • Your value suggests minimal fibrosis risk 1

NAFLD

  • Studies show cutoffs ranging from 1.24 m/s for significant fibrosis 1
  • SWV of 1.03 m/s indicates low probability of advanced steatohepatitis with fibrosis 1

Quality Control Considerations

Ensure measurement reliability by verifying:

  • IQR/M (interquartile range/median) should be <15% when reported in m/s to ensure valid staging 1
  • Measurements should be taken at 1.5-2 cm depth below liver capsule to avoid reverberation artifacts 1
  • Patient should have fasted at least 4 hours before testing, as postprandial blood flow can falsely elevate values 1
  • Repeat measurements 5-10 times and use the median value for reliability 1

Factors That Could Falsely Elevate SWE Values

Be aware that SWE results may be overestimated in:

  • Intrahepatic inflammation (acute hepatitis flares) 1
  • Cholestasis (biliary obstruction) 1
  • Right heart failure leading to hepatic congestion 1
  • Amyloidosis 1
  • Recent food intake (within 4 hours) 1

Since your value is low (1.03 m/s), these confounding factors are not relevant in this case, but they become critical when interpreting elevated values 1

Recommended Clinical Action

For a patient with SWV of 1.03 m/s:

  • No immediate need for liver biopsy based on elastography findings alone 1
  • Continue monitoring underlying liver disease with appropriate disease-specific management 1
  • Repeat elastography annually or as clinically indicated to monitor for progression 1
  • Investigate and treat the underlying cause of liver disease (viral hepatitis, metabolic syndrome, alcohol use) rather than focusing on fibrosis staging 1

Comparison to Other Non-Invasive Tests

The EASL 2021 guidelines note that:

  • Point SWE and 2D-SWE have AUROCs >0.90 for diagnosing cACLD (typically defined as LSM >10-15 kPa or approximately 1.8-2.2 m/s) 1
  • Your value of 1.03 m/s provides strong evidence against cACLD 1
  • Transient elastography cutoffs of <10 kPa (approximately 1.8 m/s) combined with platelet count >150 G/L effectively rule out high-risk varices (Baveno VI criteria) 1

Important Caveats

Remember that:

  • Optimal cutoff values vary by disease etiology and have not been universally standardized 1
  • The range of SWE measurements for each fibrosis stage is relatively wide, and differences between successive stages can be small 1
  • Inter-system variability exists between different elastography devices, so values and cutoffs are not directly comparable across platforms 1
  • Clinical context, laboratory values, and imaging findings should always be integrated with elastography results 1

References

Guideline

Guideline Directed Topic Overview

Dr.Oracle Medical Advisory Board & Editors, 2025

Related Questions

What is the most likely cause of ascites in a patient with chronic viral hepatitis and a high serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) (>1.1)?
What is the most likely cause of ascites in a patient with a history of tuberculosis, presenting with progressive abdominal distension, ascitic fluid analysis showing low white blood cell count and a serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) suggestive of portal hypertension?
What is the most likely diagnosis for a patient with diabetes who presents with progressive ascites, fever, and weight loss, and has a low serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG)?
What is the initial management for a patient with ascites and low protein level (hypoalbuminemia)?
What serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) is indicative of cirrhosis?
What are the signs and treatment options for congestion in patients with and without a history of cardiovascular disease?
What is the clinical significance of a spleen volume weight (SVW) of 1.02 in an adult patient at risk for liver disease?
Is septoplasty medically indicated for a patient with right ear pulsatile tinnitus, nasal congestion, GERD, heart disease, and a deviated nasal septum, who has not responded to conservative treatments?
What parameters should be used to hold clonidine (clonidine) 0.3 mg nightly in a patient with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and anxiety?
What is the class recommendation for a coronary angiogram (coronary artery imaging test) in patients with an ascending aneurysm, particularly those with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD)?
What is the management approach for a patient with periodic epileptiform discharges (PEDs) at risk of evolving into status epilepticus?

Professional Medical Disclaimer

This information is intended for healthcare professionals. Any medical decision-making should rely on clinical judgment and independently verified information. The content provided herein does not replace professional discretion and should be considered supplementary to established clinical guidelines. Healthcare providers should verify all information against primary literature and current practice standards before application in patient care. Dr.Oracle assumes no liability for clinical decisions based on this content.

Have a follow-up question?

Our Medical A.I. is used by practicing medical doctors at top research institutions around the world. Ask any follow up question and get world-class guideline-backed answers instantly.