BiPAP vs. CPAP: Key Differences and Clinical Applications
CPAP delivers a single, fixed pressure throughout the respiratory cycle, while BiPAP delivers a higher pressure during inspiration (IPAP) and a lower pressure during expiration (EPAP), making exhalation more comfortable against high pressures. 1
Mechanism of Action
CPAP (Continuous Positive Airway Pressure):
- Delivers one constant pressure level throughout the entire breathing cycle 1
- Maintains upper airway patency by acting as a pneumatic splint 1
- Standard starting pressure is 4 cm H₂O, with titration upward as needed 1
BiPAP (Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure):
- Delivers two distinct pressure levels: higher inspiratory pressure (IPAP) and lower expiratory pressure (EPAP) 1
- Reduces the work of exhalation by lowering pressure when the patient breathes out 1
- Standard starting pressures are IPAP 8 cm H₂O and EPAP 4 cm H₂O 1, 2
- Can provide ventilatory support through pressure differential (pressure support) 3
First-Line Therapy for OSA
For patients with uncomplicated OSA, CPAP or auto-adjusting CPAP (APAP) should be used as first-line therapy, NOT BiPAP. 1, 4
- The American Academy of Sleep Medicine recommends CPAP or APAP over BiPAP for routine OSA treatment (conditional recommendation) 1
- Meta-analyses demonstrate no clinically significant differences between BiPAP and CPAP in adherence, sleepiness reduction, quality of life, or residual apnea-hypopnea index 1
- BiPAP is more expensive than CPAP without providing superior outcomes in uncomplicated OSA 1, 4
- Modern CPAP devices with pressure relief technology (C-Flex, EPR) have reduced the historical comfort advantages of BiPAP 1
Specific Indications for BiPAP in OSA Patients
BiPAP should be reserved for specific clinical scenarios where CPAP is inadequate or not tolerated: 1, 2, 4
High Pressure Intolerance
- Switch to BiPAP when CPAP pressures exceed 15 cm H₂O and the patient cannot tolerate the pressure 1, 2
- BiPAP allows lower mean airway pressure while maintaining upper airway patency 3
- One study showed 23% of CPAP failures were due to intolerant pressures, and these patients achieved better adherence with BiPAP (7.0 vs 2.5 hours/night) 5
Pressure Requirements Exceeding Device Capacity
- BiPAP devices can deliver pressures higher than 20 cm H₂O, which standard CPAP units typically cannot provide 1, 4
- This applies to a small subset of patients requiring very high therapeutic pressures 1
Critical Indication: OSA with Obesity Hypoventilation Syndrome
For patients with OSA AND obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), the treatment algorithm differs significantly based on OSA severity:
OHS with Severe OSA (AHI ≥30 events/hour)
- Start with CPAP rather than BiPAP as first-line therapy 2, 6
- The American Thoracic Society recommends CPAP for stable ambulatory patients with OHS and concurrent severe OSA 2
- CPAP and BiPAP show similar effectiveness in improving gas exchange, daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, and adherence in this population 6
- CPAP is less costly and requires fewer resources than BiPAP 6
OHS without Severe OSA (AHI <30 events/hour)
- BiPAP may be preferred over CPAP 2
- BiPAP offers greater benefits in patients with OHS who have sleep hypoventilation without severe OSA 2
- The guideline panel acknowledged less certainty about CPAP effectiveness in this subgroup 2
OHS with Acute-on-Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure
- Start BiPAP (NIV) before hospital discharge 2
- Mortality at 3 months was significantly lower in patients discharged on PAP therapy (2.3%) versus without PAP (16.8%, P<0.0001) 2
Additional BiPAP Indications Beyond OSA
BiPAP has established roles in conditions requiring ventilatory support: 2
- COPD with chronic type 2 respiratory failure and elevated baseline PaCO₂ 2
- Neuromuscular disorders affecting respiratory function, particularly those requiring backup rate support 2
- Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure with elevated PaCO₂ and respiratory acidosis 2
- Historical data shows higher BIPAP prescription rates in OSAS patients with COPD (9 of 16 patients) or OHS (11 of 17 patients) 7
Clinical Decision Algorithm for Your Patient
For a patient with OSA and OHS, follow this approach:
Determine OSA severity from diagnostic sleep study 2
Assess for acute hypercapnic respiratory failure 2
If starting with CPAP, monitor for treatment failure indicators: 1
Important Clinical Caveats
Avoid common pitfalls when considering BiPAP:
- Do not use BiPAP routinely for uncomplicated OSA – it provides no outcome benefit over CPAP and increases cost 1, 4
- Ensure adequate PAP education, mask fitting, and acclimatization before assuming CPAP failure 1
- BiPAP with inadequate expiratory pressure (EPAP) can fail to prevent obstructive events 1
- In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, adaptive servo-ventilation (ASV) is absolutely contraindicated due to increased cardiovascular mortality 8
- BiPAP may increase myocardial infarction risk in acute heart failure compared to CPAP 2
- Monitor for aerophagia (air swallowing) with BiPAP, which can cause gastric distention 2
- Proper mask fitting is essential regardless of device type to prevent air leaks that worsen outcomes 2
Pressure Titration Guidelines
When titrating BiPAP for your patient with OSA and OHS:
- Start with IPAP 8 cm H₂O and EPAP 4 cm H₂O 1, 2
- Maintain a pressure differential of 4-6 cm H₂O typically 2
- Increase IPAP until obstructive events (apneas, hypopneas, RERAs, snoring) are eliminated 1
- Manual titration during attended polysomnography remains the gold standard for determining optimal settings 1, 2
- Target SpO₂ 90-96% during titration, with some guidelines recommending ≥92% 2